Canon Digital Photography Forums  

P.O.T.N. SUPPORT SHOP IS OPEN, check it out now!

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Equipment Talk' section > Small Compact Digitals by Canon
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16th of November 2008 (Sun)   #1
crash331
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 191
Default What technically happens when you shoot at a lower MP rating?

I am looking at getting a camera that is 10MP. I really don't need 10MP, in fact I think it would produce files that are too large. If I switch the mode to 6 or 8MP in camera, what happens? Does it just turn off the edges of the sensor, or does it do a software crop? Both seems it would upset the FOV.

Is image quality reduce (aside from the obvious reduction on MP)?
__________________
7D | 30D | 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 | 17-55 f/2.8 IS | 50mm f/1.8
Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 EX | 24-70L | 70-200L f/4 IS
crash331 is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 16th of November 2008 (Sun)   #2
Jon
Moderator

Cocker Spaniel Mod

 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kensington, MD USA
Posts: 65,130
Default Re: What technically happens when you shoot at a lower MP rating?

It merges actual pixels into "virtual pixels". You'll still get exactly the same picture, but it'll be as if you "downsized" or "resized" it in post-processing. So, taking an extreme case (for ease in math), a 10 MP camera shooting at 2.5 MP resolution will combine 4 pixels from the sensor for every output pixel.
__________________
Jon
----------
EOS, Powershot and Domke - it doesn't get any better than this!
T90 and stuff | F-1n, New F-1, FTb and more stuff out on loan
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
DC Cherry Blossoms

Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
Jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2008 (Tue)   #3
alan_potter
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
Posts: 834
Default Re: What technically happens when you shoot at a lower MP rating?

This presumably improves noise at high ISOs, yes?

regards,
/alan
__________________
Falkirk, Scotland. 350D and some lenses. Building a collection of lights to match.
Mad keen amateur musical performer, but no show currently planned.
Past shows here (updated Jan-2009 with over 1000 show photographs), show photos here.
alan_potter is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 18th of November 2008 (Tue)   #4
watchtherocks
Member
 
watchtherocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 579
Default Re: What technically happens when you shoot at a lower MP rating?

No it does not, unfortunately. Well, in SLRs at least. The sRAW modes don't offer increased noise performance.
watchtherocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2008 (Tue)   #5
Jon
Moderator

Cocker Spaniel Mod

 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kensington, MD USA
Posts: 65,130
Default Re: What technically happens when you shoot at a lower MP rating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by alan_potter View Post
This presumably improves noise at high ISOs, yes?

regards,
/alan
At least theoretically it will.
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchtherocks View Post
No it does not, unfortunately. Well, in SLRs at least. The sRAW modes don't offer increased noise performance.
sRAW, at least in the initial implementations, probably doesn't work the same way. Every JPEG pixel value is derived from the values of multiple adjacent sensor sites. Except in the case of Small JPEG, the JPEG image dimensions don't reflect a straight n:1 mapping of sensor sites to pixels, and even in that case deriving the colour for a pixel is best served by sampling the "real" adjacent sensor sites rather than by choosing every nth sensor site as a contributor, or by computing the entire image at native size and resampling it. An sRAW image (excluding the sRAW1 of the 5D II and 50D) can be simply picked up by collecting 1 in 4 sensor sites for each colour. As sRAW1 on the newer cameras contains 1/2.25 the pixels of a full RAW image, you'd need to compute intermediate values for "pseudo-pixels" to minimize problems with blocking and "jaggies" due to pixel misalignment from sampling 4 of every 9 sensor sites. Given that need, it'll be interesting to compare noise levels of sRAW 1 and sRAW 2 on these with those of sRAW in the earlier cameras.
__________________
Jon
----------
EOS, Powershot and Domke - it doesn't get any better than this!
T90 and stuff | F-1n, New F-1, FTb and more stuff out on loan
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
DC Cherry Blossoms

Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
Jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If I set the XTi to a lower resolution, will IQ improve due to a lower pixel density? bad karma Canon EOS Digital Cameras 8 4th of November 2008 (Tue) 22:18
What is technically meant by 'point and shoot'? ssd Small Compact Digitals by Canon 15 23rd of November 2006 (Thu) 13:41
Technically he isn't, I guess mikegoat People 7 25th of June 2006 (Sun) 15:54
Technically very bad, but I like it aam1234 People 4 3rd of June 2005 (Fri) 22:03
Technically it's bad, but I like it aam1234 Wildlife 2 24th of January 2005 (Mon) 08:36


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.