![]() |
|
|||||||
| sponsored links |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
I am looking at getting a camera that is 10MP. I really don't need 10MP, in fact I think it would produce files that are too large. If I switch the mode to 6 or 8MP in camera, what happens? Does it just turn off the edges of the sensor, or does it do a software crop? Both seems it would upset the FOV.
Is image quality reduce (aside from the obvious reduction on MP)?
__________________
7D | 30D | 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 | 17-55 f/2.8 IS | 50mm f/1.8 Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 EX | 24-70L | 70-200L f/4 IS |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Cocker Spaniel Mod Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kensington, MD USA
Posts: 65,130
|
It merges actual pixels into "virtual pixels". You'll still get exactly the same picture, but it'll be as if you "downsized" or "resized" it in post-processing. So, taking an extreme case (for ease in math), a 10 MP camera shooting at 2.5 MP resolution will combine 4 pixels from the sensor for every output pixel.
__________________
Jon ---------- EOS, Powershot and Domke - it doesn't get any better than this!
T90 and stuff | F-1n, New F-1, FTb and more stuff out on loan Cocker Spaniels Maryland and Virginia activities DC Cherry Blossoms Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link) PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
This presumably improves noise at high ISOs, yes?
regards, /alan |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 579
|
No it does not, unfortunately. Well, in SLRs at least. The sRAW modes don't offer increased noise performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Moderator
Cocker Spaniel Mod Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kensington, MD USA
Posts: 65,130
|
Quote:
sRAW, at least in the initial implementations, probably doesn't work the same way. Every JPEG pixel value is derived from the values of multiple adjacent sensor sites. Except in the case of Small JPEG, the JPEG image dimensions don't reflect a straight n:1 mapping of sensor sites to pixels, and even in that case deriving the colour for a pixel is best served by sampling the "real" adjacent sensor sites rather than by choosing every nth sensor site as a contributor, or by computing the entire image at native size and resampling it. An sRAW image (excluding the sRAW1 of the 5D II and 50D) can be simply picked up by collecting 1 in 4 sensor sites for each colour. As sRAW1 on the newer cameras contains 1/2.25 the pixels of a full RAW image, you'd need to compute intermediate values for "pseudo-pixels" to minimize problems with blocking and "jaggies" due to pixel misalignment from sampling 4 of every 9 sensor sites. Given that need, it'll be interesting to compare noise levels of sRAW 1 and sRAW 2 on these with those of sRAW in the earlier cameras.
__________________
Jon ---------- EOS, Powershot and Domke - it doesn't get any better than this!
T90 and stuff | F-1n, New F-1, FTb and more stuff out on loan Cocker Spaniels Maryland and Virginia activities DC Cherry Blossoms Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link) PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| If I set the XTi to a lower resolution, will IQ improve due to a lower pixel density? | bad karma | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 8 | 4th of November 2008 (Tue) 22:18 |
| What is technically meant by 'point and shoot'? | ssd | Small Compact Digitals by Canon | 15 | 23rd of November 2006 (Thu) 13:41 |
| Technically he isn't, I guess | mikegoat | People | 7 | 25th of June 2006 (Sun) 15:54 |
| Technically very bad, but I like it | aam1234 | People | 4 | 3rd of June 2005 (Fri) 22:03 |
| Technically it's bad, but I like it | aam1234 | Wildlife | 2 | 24th of January 2005 (Mon) 08:36 |