I'd like some feedback/recommendations between the 24L vs. 35L.
I enjoy low-light photography using ambient light (though I do have the 580ex2 when needed).
I don't see myself moving FF for probably another 3 years. (Maybe the 5d3 :lol And I'll most likely keep the 40D around because it won't be worth anything in terms of resale value by then. But either way, I'm guessing either lens would be great when I do adopt FF. I'm more interested in real-world experience: AF speed, accuracy, etc...
For those who have owned or tinkered with both, how would you describe the AF performance (speed/accuracy)? The only lenses I can compare them to would be the 17-55 (which IMO is blazing fast), the 50/1.4 which is so-so, or my 100 macro which can take awhile because it's hunting from my nose to moon. Where would the AF speed on the 24L & 35L fall? It's not abysmally slow as the 50/1.2L is it?
It seems the price diff is only $10, but I see both FL being close so I couldn't imagine buying both.
Thanks in advance to those taking their time to help me decide on my next prime.
I know there's also the Sigma 30/1.4, but being for crop-only and a lot gentler on the pocket books. Although I'll move to FF someday (while retaining the 40D), I think it'd be wiser on my part to get something that works well, and works for both FF and crop, even if it's still quite a few years away.