![]() |
|
|||||||
| sponsored links |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Goldmember
|
__________________
EOS 7d, 50d, Tokina 11-16, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, 580EX Speedlites When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away http://www.tawilsonphotography.com |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 6,124
|
I wonder how soon it will be before one of the camera manufacturers buys this work up?
__________________
Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams Keep calm and carry a camera! My Gear |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Goldmember
|
I wonder what it will do for lenses..since they won't have to compsenate for the difference between a curved lense and a flat chip..will they get lighter, smaller etc..?
__________________
EOS 7d, 50d, Tokina 11-16, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, 580EX Speedlites When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away http://www.tawilsonphotography.com |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
"your nose is too big"
|
It won't do anything for lenses, at least in the SLR world. The manufacturers have to worry about compatibility. No point introducing a new sensor if it means (a) none of your existing lenses work with it, and (b) the new lenses which you make for it don't work with any previous cameras. It would be a much bigger change than Canon's FD-to-EF switch in the 1980s, because at least then all they were redesigning was the mount and the electronics, not the entire optical configuration.
__________________
www.LensesForHire.co.uk - complete with matching POTN discussion thread Photos: Cats | London by day | London by night I My POTN photo sharing threads | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
|
The idea of a curved sensor is old, and not revolutionary. Film cameras have been produced this way for managing distortion in panoramic images. Not a winning technology.
More interesting is the nano size of the photo sensors, but... I guess that, because technology for sensors is already close to the limits of the resolving capabilities of lenses, the vantages will be limited, until there is a breakthrough in opticts. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Happy Accident | PhotoJourno | People | 14 | 12th of May 2008 (Mon) 02:23 |
| One of the time that higher resolution is a must! | vdhieu84 | The POTN Lounge | 5 | 16th of April 2008 (Wed) 09:49 |
| Printing photos at higher resolution | CookieMonster | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 1 | 13th of July 2005 (Wed) 09:35 |
| A happy accident. | cgesteland | Critique Corner | 3 | 7th of August 2002 (Wed) 21:08 |