LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Dye-Sub printer. Which one?

FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing
Thread started 08 Mar 2005 (Tuesday) 10:27   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Wendy ­ Lilygreen
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2003
127 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm thinking about buying a dye-sub printer to use at equestrian events. I've started to do a bit of research on the web but then thought of you guys!
Anyone got any recommendations? Thoughts on the subject?

Cheers
Wendy

Post #1, Mar 08, 2005 10:27:24


Lilers

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
kb244
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2003
766 posts
Grand Rapids, Michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

Hrm, why Dye-Sub? Three Problems I normally see.

1) Colors arnt always as vibrant as say other portible 4x6 printers ( Epson Picturemate, Hp 375 )
2) Dyesub printers are more subseptible to dust/hair/etc , because the dye subs go back and forth covering one color layer over the next, any dust gets on there they show up as rainbow specks, any hair gets on there they get traped in the layer, or possibly causing a big color streak.
3) From what I understand Dye Sub prints only last 7 years or so.

Post #2, Mar 08, 2005 10:52:09


-Karl Blessing
PHP/MySQL Webdeveloper & Photographer.
My Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Wendy ­ Lilygreen
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2003
127 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hi KB,
I was thinking about a dye-sub so I could actually produce prints on the day rather than just contact sheets and taking orders which is how we work at the mo. I then come home and process them on an Epson 4000.
We use a HP Photosmart to produce the contact sheets but obviously I couldn't sell the prints from that because of longevity etc.
Also a dye sub would reduce my workload then throughout the week.

I really apprecite what you say tho. I was thinking about the new Kodak one or a mitsubishi CP8000.
I want to offer 7 x 5 and 8 x 6 prints.

Thanks for your input.

Wendy

Post #3, Mar 08, 2005 13:33:45


Lilers

LOG IN TO REPLY
kb244
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2003
766 posts
Grand Rapids, Michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

Well if thats your main reason look at the Epson Picturemate, if you have a power invertor, its small, it'll print them out right there for ya, and the images are rated for 100 years ( under glass ) And 200 years in an albumn. However this is 4x6 only. I dont know much about the much more expensive 5x7, 8x6 dye sub printers.

Post #4, Mar 08, 2005 14:01:40


-Karl Blessing
PHP/MySQL Webdeveloper & Photographer.
My Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Wendy ­ Lilygreen
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2003
127 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hmmm, 50 years will do me! After that I expect to be pushing up the daisies!

Post #5, Mar 08, 2005 14:13:34


Lilers

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mobilestudio1
Member
Joined Feb 2005
55 posts
Long Island, NY
[MORE/SHARE]

I personally only use dye-sub printers and think the print quality is outstanding.
We have a Kodak 8600, the new Kodak 1400 and a HiTi 730PS for 4x6, 5x7 and 6x8's. We also use them at outdoor events where dust and dirt can be an issue but, knock on wood, we've never had a problem. We're usually in a large tent and we keep the side panels down on the two walls along the computer & printer table. If the computer or printers are going to be idle for any period of time, I usually drape each one with a large, cotton piece of fabric to protect the equipment in general from dust and dirt & I will sometimes shut them down so the fan doesn't pull in dirt. The only other added measure I take with the equipment we use outside is, I throw one of those dehumidifiers that you bake to "reactivate." They're supper cheap but a great investment. At the end of the day, i put one in the computer box, one in each of the printer boxes and pack up and go home. It just helps to pull out any moisture that humid days may have left behind and keeps your equipment good as new. :D

Post #6, Mar 08, 2005 14:34:28 as a reply to kb244's post 32 minutes earlier.


http://www.nocturnalli​ght.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Vegas ­ Poboy
Senior Member
Vegas Poboy's Avatar
Joined Aug 2003
950 posts
Las Vegas, NV
[MORE/SHARE]

I currently have two Olympus 440's & 1 P400 and they do great for event work but I just received info that Olympus is going to stop making them but keep the ink & paper in stock, so you may want to look hard @ the kodaks.

Post #7, Mar 08, 2005 19:47:45 as a reply to mobilestudio1's post 5 hours earlier.


$$$ in Canon Gear & Lighting Equipment

LOG IN TO REPLY
kb244
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2003
766 posts
Grand Rapids, Michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

I hope the kodak dye subs are alot better than what they are using for the cheaper Kodak PrinterDocks ( which are horrible in color quality )

Post #8, Mar 08, 2005 21:20:29


-Karl Blessing
PHP/MySQL Webdeveloper & Photographer.
My Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Wendy ­ Lilygreen
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2003
127 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hi All,
Thanks all for your feedback, it's really useful.

Wendy

Post #9, Mar 09, 2005 01:37:47


Lilers

LOG IN TO REPLY
rufis6
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2004
125 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I have a Kodak 8500 Dye Sub printer and could not be happier. Those who believe the archival life of the prints are way off base. Check with Kodak and get the real skinny, which is much more than 7 years. As for print quality, it couldn't be better. Additionally, you will never have a problem with ink clogging your lines because it is Dye Sub and uses no messy ink cartridges. Speaking of clogging, you will also never have a problem with one ink running out in the middle of printing; Dye Subs don't work like that. An additional benefit is that the print costs are set in cement, for the Kodak 8500 which I use, the cost is $1.78 per 8 10 print. And you can use one 8 X 10 sheep of paper to accomodate several smaller size prints. An 8 X 10 prints takes 75 seconds to print; the new Kodak 1400 takes 90 seconds to print. Additionally, the 1400 will print at a larger dimension than the 8500. I previously owned a Canon Dye Sub but got rid of the thing because it only uses a bastard-size paper, not a full 8 X 10.

Post #10, Mar 09, 2005 17:46:36 as a reply to Wendy Lilygreen's post 16 hours earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
etaf
Goldmember
etaf's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
1,221 posts
Surrey, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

i'm also looking into dye-sub {HiTi 730PS} and I'm a little concerned now about the life of sye-sub prints. Still trying to find the facts :(

Post #11, Mar 10, 2005 02:10:34


60D | EF-S 18-200 | 50mm 2.5 macro | 550EX | Pro1 | Elements

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mbze430
Goldmember
mbze430's Avatar
Joined Feb 2005
2,454 posts
Chino Hills
[MORE/SHARE]

Kodak is coming out with the 1400 for the "desktop" users.

Post #12, Mar 10, 2005 02:19:13


Gear List

My Hub to my personal workexternal link (just click on the banners)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Wendy ­ Lilygreen
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2003
127 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

There is another on the Mitsubishi CP8000 I haven't been able to find out much about it but for event photographers it comes in a blue case, see www.totallydigital.bizexternal link I just want the printer but haven't been able to find out much about the specifications as yet.

Wendy

Post #13, Mar 10, 2005 02:29:59


Lilers

LOG IN TO REPLY
Craig ­ Schwartz
Hatchling
Joined Jan 2005
9 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

Wendy Lilygreen wrote:
I'm thinking about buying a dye-sub printer to use at equestrian events. I've started to do a bit of research on the web but then thought of you guys!
Anyone got any recommendations? Thoughts on the subject?

Cheers
Wendy

Hi Wendy and all!

I use a Fuji Pictrography printer, but not on location. It prints on honest to goodness silver based color paper. It uses distilled water to process and the maintenance is low. The printer runs around $4000.00 US. Supplies will run about $350.00 for about 130 prints. Print time is roughly 70 seconds for the first print and that's an 8 1/2 x 11 @ 400 dpi print.The results are stunning! And if the print should accidently get wet (because your clients are drooling over your work) just let it dry-No smearing like ink-based printers!

Craig :)

Post #14, Mar 10, 2005 13:20:29




LOG IN TO REPLY
Wendy ­ Lilygreen
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2003
127 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hi All,
I think the Kodak maybe a bit big it's 30" across and it only seems to take A4 size pics and while you can put two smaller ones on the sheet there is then the problem of cutting it in half. A bit of a bother in a small caravan(trailer) if its full of people.
the mitsubishi while a nice printer comes in at £1400 which is more than I want to spend.
The HiTi 730 Gala would seem to fit the bill, it has different size paper trays which appear easy to change over plus it has a small footprint. I'm gonna do some more reasearch and will let you know.
wendy

Post #15, Mar 11, 2005 01:53:51


Lilers

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
3,060 views & 0 likes for this thread
Dye-Sub printer. Which one?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.001 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
790 guests, 624 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Blueme

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.