Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Nature & Landscapes Talk
Thread started 02 Jan 2009 (Friday) 15:13
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Vignette Questions - Canon 17-40mm [Cokin]

 
CanonTx88
Junior Member
CanonTx88's Avatar
28 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Flower Mound, Texas
Jan 02, 2009 15:13 |  #1

I'm looking to purchase a Canon 17-40mm here in the near future. I currently own the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, but in many landscape photographs found in my photography magazines, flickr and elsewhere, I continually see the 17-40 being used.

I've read that this lens has vignetting problems, so here's my question:

What will cause this wide-angle lens to vignette less when using filters?

1) Should the Cokin BPW700 Wide Angle Filter Holder for P Series filters do the job?

OR

2) Go with the Cokin Z Pro Filter Holder?
---------------

I know I am limited to the use of only 1 filter if I chose the former option, the Cokin BPW700 Wide Angle Filter Holder, but I am okay with this, because I plan to use other [Singh-Ray] filters before adding on the filter-holder.

My set-up will probably end up looking similar to this:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img140.imagesha​ck.us ...0/6277/filtersetupm​s3.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img140.imagesha​ck.us ...rsetupms3.jpg/1/w10​24.png (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
argyle
Cream of the Crop
argyle's Avatar
8,186 posts
Joined Apr 2007
DFW, Texas
Jan 10, 2009 09:20 |  #2

Never mind...post and pictures removed.

Sorry, just had to comment...that has got to be the hokiest setup I've ever seen. Holding GND's and a holder with rubber bands? Wow. If that's yours, I'd seriously look into a different arrangement. If its not yours, don't emulate it.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

LOG IN TO REPLY
gregpphoto
Goldmember
1,122 posts
Joined Jun 2008
NJ
Jan 14, 2009 13:40 |  #3

Yo if it works it works. I rig my flashes up with bungee cords and A clamps or whatever the hell I can find.


gregpphoto.comexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
SwingBopper
Goldmember
SwingBopper's Avatar
2,664 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Japan
Jan 15, 2009 00:23 |  #4

I use a Cokin setup and never have to use rubber bands. What's with that?


EOS 5D II, 40D, Sony R1, Olympus 1030, Canon S5-IS.
"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." A. Hamilton

LOG IN TO REPLY
blackcap
Senior Member
415 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Jan 15, 2009 03:57 |  #5

The only reason I could think of re the rubber bands is that the screw-in filter doesn't have any threads for the filter holder? I couldn't imagine shooting with a setup like this - I can just imagine the rubber bands breaking or slipping off - bye bye filters!


_______________
www.chrisgin.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Agnu
Senior Member
Agnu's Avatar
779 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Blue Mountains, Australia
Jan 18, 2009 00:17 |  #6

I don't even have a filter holder that fits, I literally hold the filter infront of my camera haha. Dodgy as all hell I know but I can't afford a filter holder so I just make do with what I have :). At the age of 17 it does the job just fine.


Angus Scott Photography
Gripped 5DmkII | 17-40L | 35L | Sigma 50/1.4 | 135L
Bronica SQAi | 80/2.8 150/4
Websiteexternal link | Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
gregpphoto
Goldmember
1,122 posts
Joined Jun 2008
NJ
Jan 18, 2009 05:51 |  #7

Agnu wrote in post #7100846external link
I don't even have a filter holder that fits, I literally hold the filter infront of my camera haha. Dodgy as all hell I know but I can't afford a filter holder so I just make do with what I have :). At the age of 17 it does the job just fine.

I've used my CP in front a fisheye in the same manner!


gregpphoto.comexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
NinetyEight
"Banned for life"
NinetyEight's Avatar
3,138 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Dorset - England
Jan 20, 2009 13:39 |  #8

I'm always amazed that people are prepared to spend thousands of pounds/dollars/beans etc. on top class DSLR's and 'L' lenses, and then spend next to sweet ***k-all on a decent filter and holder and resort to using some cr*ppy rubber bands.... ??? ??? ???

Maybe it's me....:rolleyes:


Kev

LOG IN TO REPLY
gregpphoto
Goldmember
1,122 posts
Joined Jun 2008
NJ
Jan 21, 2009 12:19 |  #9

NinetyEight wrote in post #7118216external link
I'm always amazed that people are prepared to spend thousands of pounds/dollars/beans etc. on top class DSLR's and 'L' lenses, and then spend next to sweet ***k-all on a decent filter and holder and resort to using some cr*ppy rubber bands.... ??? ??? ???

Maybe it's me....:rolleyes:

And how does ghetto rigging a filter affect image quality? Yea...


gregpphoto.comexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
NinetyEight
"Banned for life"
NinetyEight's Avatar
3,138 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Dorset - England
Jan 21, 2009 12:53 |  #10

gregpphoto wrote in post #7125633external link
And how does ghetto rigging a filter affect image quality? Yea...

I never said it would or could affect image quality - I simply stated that I am amazed that people do this sort of thing, I liken it to fitting a dodgy old ill-fitting roof-rack onto an expensive car with a piece of duct tape and a bungee strap - Just a personal observation/opinion ;)


Kev

LOG IN TO REPLY
bretedge
Member
86 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Jan 27, 2009 17:27 |  #11

I own the 17-40mm lens and shoot with it quite frequently. I've used my Singh-Ray warming polarizer (thin mount) and 2 GND's with it with no or minimal vignetting. The secret: hand hold the GND's. It's easier than it seems.

FWIW, I used the Cokin holder for years and got rid of it after learning how to hand hold the filters. I've also used duct tape to hold them in place but again, hand holding works much better. Give it a shot...


Bret Edge
Moab, Utah
Private and Group Photography Workshopsexternal link
The Essential Guide to Photographing Arches National Parkexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

5,391 views & 0 likes for this thread
Vignette Questions - Canon 17-40mm [Cokin]
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Nature & Landscapes Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00138 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is ERDUNN
901 guests, 615 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016