Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Nature & Landscapes Talk 
Thread started 02 Jan 2009 (Friday) 15:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Vignette Questions - Canon 17-40mm [Cokin]

 
CanonTx88
Junior Member
Avatar
28 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Flower Mound, Texas
     
Jan 02, 2009 15:13 |  #1

I'm looking to purchase a Canon 17-40mm here in the near future. I currently own the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, but in many landscape photographs found in my photography magazines, flickr and elsewhere, I continually see the 17-40 being used.

I've read that this lens has vignetting problems, so here's my question:

What will cause this wide-angle lens to vignette less when using filters?

1) Should the Cokin BPW700 Wide Angle Filter Holder for P Series filters do the job?

OR

2) Go with the Cokin Z Pro Filter Holder?
---------------

I know I am limited to the use of only 1 filter if I chose the former option, the Cokin BPW700 Wide Angle Filter Holder, but I am okay with this, because I plan to use other [Singh-Ray] filters before adding on the filter-holder.

My set-up will probably end up looking similar to this:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Jan 10, 2009 09:20 |  #2

Never mind...post and pictures removed.

Sorry, just had to comment...that has got to be the hokiest setup I've ever seen. Holding GND's and a holder with rubber bands? Wow. If that's yours, I'd seriously look into a different arrangement. If its not yours, don't emulate it.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregpphoto
Goldmember
1,123 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: NJ
     
Jan 14, 2009 13:40 |  #3

Yo if it works it works. I rig my flashes up with bungee cords and A clamps or whatever the hell I can find.


gregpphoto.com (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SwingBopper
Goldmember
Avatar
2,664 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Japan
     
Jan 15, 2009 00:23 |  #4

I use a Cokin setup and never have to use rubber bands. What's with that?


EOS 5D II, 40D, Sony R1, Olympus 1030, Canon S5-IS.
"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." A. Hamilton

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackcap
Senior Member
415 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
     
Jan 15, 2009 03:57 |  #5

The only reason I could think of re the rubber bands is that the screw-in filter doesn't have any threads for the filter holder? I couldn't imagine shooting with a setup like this - I can just imagine the rubber bands breaking or slipping off - bye bye filters!


_______________
www.chrisgin.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Agnu
Senior Member
Avatar
779 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
     
Jan 18, 2009 00:17 |  #6

I don't even have a filter holder that fits, I literally hold the filter infront of my camera haha. Dodgy as all hell I know but I can't afford a filter holder so I just make do with what I have :). At the age of 17 it does the job just fine.


Angus Scott Photography
Gripped 5DmkII | 17-40L | 35L | Sigma 50/1.4 | 135L
Bronica SQAi | 80/2.8 150/4
Website (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregpphoto
Goldmember
1,123 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: NJ
     
Jan 18, 2009 05:51 |  #7

Agnu wrote in post #7100846 (external link)
I don't even have a filter holder that fits, I literally hold the filter infront of my camera haha. Dodgy as all hell I know but I can't afford a filter holder so I just make do with what I have :). At the age of 17 it does the job just fine.

I've used my CP in front a fisheye in the same manner!


gregpphoto.com (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NinetyEight
"Banned for life"
Avatar
3,186 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 22
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Dorset - England
     
Jan 20, 2009 13:39 |  #8

I'm always amazed that people are prepared to spend thousands of pounds/dollars/beans etc. on top class DSLR's and 'L' lenses, and then spend next to sweet ***k-all on a decent filter and holder and resort to using some cr*ppy rubber bands.... ??? ??? ???

Maybe it's me....:rolleyes:


Kev

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregpphoto
Goldmember
1,123 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: NJ
     
Jan 21, 2009 12:19 |  #9

NinetyEight wrote in post #7118216 (external link)
I'm always amazed that people are prepared to spend thousands of pounds/dollars/beans etc. on top class DSLR's and 'L' lenses, and then spend next to sweet ***k-all on a decent filter and holder and resort to using some cr*ppy rubber bands.... ??? ??? ???

Maybe it's me....:rolleyes:

And how does ghetto rigging a filter affect image quality? Yea...


gregpphoto.com (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NinetyEight
"Banned for life"
Avatar
3,186 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 22
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Dorset - England
     
Jan 21, 2009 12:53 |  #10

gregpphoto wrote in post #7125633 (external link)
And how does ghetto rigging a filter affect image quality? Yea...

I never said it would or could affect image quality - I simply stated that I am amazed that people do this sort of thing, I liken it to fitting a dodgy old ill-fitting roof-rack onto an expensive car with a piece of duct tape and a bungee strap - Just a personal observation/opinion ;)


Kev

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bretedge
Member
86 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Jan 27, 2009 17:27 |  #11

I own the 17-40mm lens and shoot with it quite frequently. I've used my Singh-Ray warming polarizer (thin mount) and 2 GND's with it with no or minimal vignetting. The secret: hand hold the GND's. It's easier than it seems.

FWIW, I used the Cokin holder for years and got rid of it after learning how to hand hold the filters. I've also used duct tape to hold them in place but again, hand holding works much better. Give it a shot...


Bret Edge
Moab, Utah
Private and Group Photography Workshops (external link)
The Essential Guide to Photographing Arches National Park (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

6,205 views & 0 likes for this thread
Vignette Questions - Canon 17-40mm [Cokin]
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Nature & Landscapes Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Nidge
712 guests, 391 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.