LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


IS on 17-55 f/2.8 vs. 24-105 f/4L

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 05 Jan 2009 (Monday) 19:41   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
enrixan
Member
Joined May 2008
97 posts
LA
[MORE/SHARE]

Hi,

I've been around the forum for some time and just got my first dslr
for a few months now. I currently have the 17-55 f/2.8 IS (got it at
a very good price) and am considering swapping with a 24-105 f/4
because I feel like I like more reach.. I kinda like to take candid
shots of my friends. Anyway, I also have a tokina 12-24 so I got the
wide angle covered.

My question is, how's the IS on 24-105 compared to 17-55..
I haven't seen anyone ask this question yet so.. hopefully someone
can answer me for those that have experience with both
lenses.

Thank you for any response!
I appreciate your time.

Post #1, Jan 05, 2009 19:41:27


Canon 40D
Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS
Sigma 30mm f/1.4
Canon 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
jwcdds's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
12,176 posts
Santa Monica, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm pretty sure the IS is decent on the 24-105L. The only thing you need to factor in is you're starting at f/4 instead of f/2.8. However, the 17-55 stops short at 55, so if it's longer you want, you're option is simply going w/ the 24-105L.

Post #2, Jan 05, 2009 19:59:10


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMugexternal link | Blogexternal link
My Review | "The Mighty One"external link
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

LOG IN TO REPLY
braidkid
Senior Member
braidkid's Avatar
Joined Oct 2008
366 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I asked a similar queston here...

http://photography-on-the.net ...php?p=6993276#post6​993276

Sounds like the older IS system (24-105) is less prone to failure than the newer IS system (17-55). Doesn't make much sense to me. You would think the new IS would be just as reliable as the old version but I digress.

Post #3, Jan 05, 2009 20:07:46 as a reply to jwcdds's post 8 minutes earlier.


5Dii, 17-40L, 50f1.4, 580ex II, 430ex II
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/braidkid/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeff81
Goldmember
Jeff81's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
1,629 posts
SoCal
[MORE/SHARE]

It works great. As mentioned previously, it is f/4, so shooting indoors/low light situations is a little more difficult compared to the 17-55. I actually made the opposite change from what you're considering because I wanted a wider walk-around lens. I decided to keep the 17-55 instead of selling it though. The 24-105 works great for candid shots of family/friends. Its a great lens, I think you'll be happy with it.

Post #4, Jan 05, 2009 20:16:03


6D | Canon 35 f/2 IS (coming soon), Sigma 50 f/1.4, Canon 135L f/2 (coming soon), Canon 70-200L f/4 IS
Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
enrixan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined May 2008
97 posts
LA
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks for the advices guys.. I do find it weird that the old IS is better than the new one though.. I think i have much more skill to learn before I change my equipment, so probably I'm going to stick to m current setup until I really learn my style of shooting..

Before DSLR, I had a panasonic FZ50 and a canon S1IS, both super zoom P&S.. so as you can see, It's hard for me to live with mere 17-55!! lol..

Post #5, Jan 06, 2009 01:47:02


Canon 40D
Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS
Sigma 30mm f/1.4
Canon 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
jwcdds's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
12,176 posts
Santa Monica, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

If it's super zoom that you're used to, you can look at picking up:
- canon 18-200
- tamron 18-270
- sigma 18-200

Post #6, Jan 06, 2009 09:18:29


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMugexternal link | Blogexternal link
My Review | "The Mighty One"external link
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
picturecrazy's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
8,504 posts
Alberta, CANADA
[MORE/SHARE]

17-55 is very hard to beat. I find the image quality from the 17-55 is consistently better than the 24-105. The focus speed and accuracy is also better. The IS works well on both lenses, though the 17-55 IS motor is less reliable. Turn it on ONLY when you truly need it, and it should last forever. I would _NEVER_ trade in a 17-55 for a 24-105 if I only owned a 40D. I'd much rather buy a telephoto instead to go WITH the 17-55. 85 1.8, 100 F/2, 70-200.

Post #7, Jan 06, 2009 10:05:45


-Lloyd
BOUDOIR WEBSITE: The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photographyexternal link
Lifestyle Website: Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographersexternal link
Facebookexternal link | Twitterexternal link | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
nicksan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
24,585 posts
NYC
[MORE/SHARE]

Both have up to 3 stops of I.S. so they FUNCTION the same.
As for reliability, you have to like the odds on the "L"...but on a 1.6x crop body the 17-55 IS is probably the first lens I would buy for it.

Post #8, Jan 06, 2009 11:11:56


NYC Wedding Photographerexternal link | Blogexternal link | facebookexternal link | Flickrexternal link | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
showtm490
Senior Member
showtm490's Avatar
Joined May 2007
562 posts
Forsyth GA
[MORE/SHARE]

Just curious, I'm looking to buying a 17-55 but I've heard a few people claiming they had to have the IS repaired. Is this common? If so I'm now nervous about buying a used one with no warranty.

Post #9, Jan 06, 2009 14:47:51 as a reply to nicksan's post 3 hours earlier.


JohnBphotography.netexternal link
Flickrexternal link
Canon 5D with Grip - Sigma 35 Art - Canon 85 f1.8 - Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS II - Canon 430EX - RadioPopper JrX Studio - AB1600 - AB800 - AB 47' Octa

LOG IN TO REPLY
SoundsGood
Goldmember
SoundsGood's Avatar
Joined Nov 2006
1,968 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

showtm490 wrote in post #7017557external link
...I've heard a few people claiming they had to have the IS repaired. Is this common?

I'd like to know too... I've got one arriving in 2 days.

Post #10, Jan 06, 2009 15:42:30



40D and a whole bunch of lenses
Canon 430EX, Kenko 1.4x, Domke F-3X, F-5XB, Zeikos grip
Zenfolio Discount Code: YGK-8U7-1GGexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeff81
Goldmember
Jeff81's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
1,629 posts
SoCal
[MORE/SHARE]

showtm490 wrote in post #7017557external link
Just curious, I'm looking to buying a 17-55 but I've heard a few people claiming they had to have the IS repaired. Is this common? If so I'm now nervous about buying a used one with no warranty.

As far as I can tell its not super common but I have had a few people recommend keeping the IS on only when you need to use it so it lasts longer.

Post #11, Jan 06, 2009 15:44:43


6D | Canon 35 f/2 IS (coming soon), Sigma 50 f/1.4, Canon 135L f/2 (coming soon), Canon 70-200L f/4 IS
Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
braidkid
Senior Member
braidkid's Avatar
Joined Oct 2008
366 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

If you do a search you'll find several people complain of IS failures on the 17-55. I believe it's documented enough to warrant concern. I recently bought a 17-55 and only use the IS when needed. The cost is around $100 for repair. I have heard of several months grace period after the year warranty in which Canon repaired free of charge.

Other than this issue and occasional flare, it's a wonderful lens.

Post #12, Jan 06, 2009 16:16:54 as a reply to Jeff81's post 32 minutes earlier.


5Dii, 17-40L, 50f1.4, 580ex II, 430ex II
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/braidkid/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
handyhaver
Senior Member
handyhaver's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
722 posts
Philly Burbs
[MORE/SHARE]

I bought both at once to see which would suit my shooting needs. I sent the 17-55 back and have no regrets. I love my 24-105. Yes at time I wish I could go wider or faster without changing lenses, but most of my shooting is outdoors & the 24-105 shines:cool:. I love the extra reach when it's needed.

Mark

Post #13, Jan 06, 2009 16:17:53 as a reply to Jeff81's post 33 minutes earlier.


You can check out any time you like....,but you can never leave. 40D, 24-105 f4LIS, 70-200 f4LIS[COLOR=black],100 f2.8LIS macro, Sig 50mm f1.4 , Sig 10-20 , 580EXll ,430EX, ST-E2, S2IS

http://handyhaver.zenf​olio.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
enrixan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined May 2008
97 posts
LA
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks for the tip about the IS. I'll keep that in mind. is the IS on 28-135 equally good?? I'm guessing not.. anyway, in general i like (LOVE) my UWA, so I don't think I can part away from it. However, once in a while I do like to take some candid shots with extra reach of at least 100mm zoom, which is why i think the 24-105 would make an excellent walk around. or the 28-135 as a much cheaper alternative..

Have you guys heard about the tokina 16.5-135???? It's gonna be so interesting to see that come out!! i wish it had constant aperture of 4 though... currently I believe it's 3.5-5.6. It's like a 28-135 without IS and with wider angle.

Post #14, Jan 10, 2009 03:53:25


Canon 40D
Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS
Sigma 30mm f/1.4
Canon 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
Oteck
Senior Member
Joined Aug 2008
570 posts
Vancouver B.C.
[MORE/SHARE]

you may want to consider primes if you want to do candid like the 85 or 135.
an alternative is get the 70-200. I run this setup and i never miss the 55-70mm gap

Post #15, Jan 10, 2009 04:02:55


Canon 7D, 50D/BG-E2N, 580EXII
EF-s 10-22mm, EF-s 17-55mm 2.8 [70-200mm IS 2.8L[COLOR=Red][COLOR=Blac​k]][85L[COLOR=Red] [COLOR=Black]1.2] (coming soon 35L II? [COLOR=Red][COLOR=Blac​k]50L II?)

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,244 views & 0 likes for this thread
IS on 17-55 f/2.8 vs. 24-105 f/4L
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00101 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
847 guests, 651 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is movieplayer

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.