Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 08 Jan 2009 (Thursday) 18:01
PREV/NEXT

Sigma Zoom Normal-Telephoto 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX DG HSM Autofocus Lens for Canon

 
Simon ­ Turkin
Senior Member
Simon Turkin's Avatar
543 posts

Joined Jan 2009

New York
MORE INFO

I am a new member to POTN and i need some advice... I have a 50d with the grip and a 15mm fisheye, 70-300mm standard zoom, and a 28- 138mm kit lens if you have knowledge reguarding the lens or a suggestion towards my next purchase it would be a large help!

Jan 08, 2009 18:01

Gripped 50D - AE-1- Canon 70-300 is usm - Canon 28-135 is usm - Canon 15 fish eye - Canon niffty 50 f/1.8 - Canon 430 ex II - Manfrotto 680B Monopod - Sandisk extreme III 4 GB - and some odds and ends my flickr-
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/simonturkin/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
katodog
Goldmember
katodog's Avatar
3,977 posts
GALLERY: 1 photo
Joined Nov 2008

Carol Stream, Illinois
MORE INFO

The Bigma, as it's called, is supposedly an excellent lens. You should check the lens archives to see pics from this lens. I was going to buy it, but I wanted a lens with stabilization, so I went with the Sigma 150-500mm OS lens, which is an excellent lens also.


Sigma 50-500mm archive


Sigma 150-500mm OS Archive

Jan 08, 2009 18:09

The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickrexternal link-external linkFacebookexternal linkhttp://katophoto.smugm​ug.com/external linkSmoke Photography-external linkSound-Activated Painthttp://katophoto.smugm​ug.com/external linkhttp://katophoto.smugm​ug.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
gasrocks's Avatar
13,431 posts

Joined Mar 2005

Portage, Wisconsin USA
MORE INFO

For advice on next purchase you have to tell us your budget and what you'll be shooting.

Jan 08, 2009 19:28

GEAR LIST
_______________

LOG IN TO REPLY
Simon ­ Turkin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Simon Turkin's Avatar
543 posts

Joined Jan 2009

New York
MORE INFO

Im still a high school student with out a job so as you can imagine Im running off savings witch are disappering rapidly...
I would shell out 1500 on a fantastic lens though

I mostly shoot sports and I occasionaly shoot portiats and animals

Jan 08, 2009 20:23

Gripped 50D - AE-1- Canon 70-300 is usm - Canon 28-135 is usm - Canon 15 fish eye - Canon niffty 50 f/1.8 - Canon 430 ex II - Manfrotto 680B Monopod - Sandisk extreme III 4 GB - and some odds and ends my flickr-
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/simonturkin/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
Goldmember
katodog's Avatar
3,977 posts
GALLERY: 1 photo
Joined Nov 2008

Carol Stream, Illinois
MORE INFO

$1500 on a fantastic lens say to me either the Sigma 150-500mm OS or the Canon 100-400mm L IS. They both have almost identical IQ, and are both excellent lenses. The one thing that separates them is the 100mm difference at the high end and the fact that the Canon is a push/pull zoom and the Sig is a twist zoom. I didn't care much for the push/pull of the Canon lens, but it really is an excellent lens. I also preferred the longer reach of the Sig over the Canon. Having almost identical IQ makes it a hard decision, but the decision will be made by how you like the zoom operation of the lenses.

For sports I'd say the Canon 70-200mm f2.8. It's a fast lens, and seems to be the recommended lens for sports shooting. This lens will put you at your limit money-wise though. You can get the non-IS f2.8 cheaper, but I wouldn't shoot sports without IS.


Other than shooting really fast stuff, I'd still say the Sig 150-500mm OS. I haven't had any problems shooting all kinds of stuff with it. Although it and the Canon 100-400mm need decent light, I haven't had too many problems in low light with the Sig. Shooting birds in flight isn't a problem with the Sig, so I'd figure sports wouldn't be that hard either.

Jan 08, 2009 20:42

The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickrexternal link-external linkFacebookexternal linkhttp://katophoto.smugm​ug.com/external linkSmoke Photography-external linkSound-Activated Painthttp://katophoto.smugm​ug.com/external linkhttp://katophoto.smugm​ug.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
sjlund
Senior Member
568 posts
Joined Mar 2007

Northern Minnesota
MORE INFO

katodog wrote in post #7035582external link
...but I wouldn't shoot sports without IS.

Why not? IS won't stop subject movement, and if you're shooting with a high enough shutter speed to freeze a football player (or whatever), camera shake shouldn't be an issue.

Jan 08, 2009 21:49

Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
05Xrunner's Avatar
4,709 posts

Joined Dec 2005

Pittsburgh PA
MORE INFO

I use to have the 50-500 DG for a while. I though it was a GREAT lens..VERY fast AF maybe faster then my 100-400, Great IQ, sharp and killer range. Just need a monopod with it on overcast days..But if shooting in daytime with good light its a killer lens

Jan 08, 2009 22:48 as a reply to sjlund's post 59 minutes earlier.

My gear
Canon 1D Mark III: Canon 50 1.8 STM:Canon 24-105L:Canon 70-200f4L:Sigma 150-600 C:Shanny SN600C flash

LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
Goldmember
katodog's Avatar
3,977 posts
GALLERY: 1 photo
Joined Nov 2008

Carol Stream, Illinois
MORE INFO

sjlund wrote in post #7036108external link
Why not? IS won't stop subject movement, and if you're shooting with a high enough shutter speed to freeze a football player (or whatever), camera shake shouldn't be an issue.



That's a good point.

I don't shoot much sports, but I do shoot moving subjects, like birds, airplanes, kids running around, etc., and the stabilized lenses seem to help with most cases. But, I guess at higher shutter speeds IS wouldn't be needed all that much. But, it does come into play if the OP wants to shoot wildlife that's not moving around that much, like ducks in a pond, zoo animals, etc.. Plus it helps for shooting portraits and such without needing to rely on a tripod or monopod. Which is helpful when you're out in the field and are just doing casual shooting. I know there's been plenty of times that I would prefer either not to carry the tripod around, or I just don't want to take the time to set up. Impromptu shots are easier when they're impromptu.

Jan 09, 2009 07:25

The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickrexternal link-external linkFacebookexternal linkhttp://katophoto.smugm​ug.com/external linkSmoke Photography-external linkSound-Activated Painthttp://katophoto.smugm​ug.com/external linkhttp://katophoto.smugm​ug.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
gasrocks's Avatar
13,431 posts

Joined Mar 2005

Portage, Wisconsin USA
MORE INFO

Nothing wrong with working your way up. Get the BIgma and use it on a monopod.

Jan 09, 2009 08:27

GEAR LIST
_______________

LOG IN TO REPLY
Evan ­ Idler
Goldmember
Evan Idler's Avatar
1,583 posts

Joined May 2005

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
MORE INFO

Well, after using my Sigma 50-500 EX DG for 3 years I would recommend it without hesitation to anyone that asks. And I got the new Sigma 150-500 EX OS for christmas, so I will let you know what i think of it later in the year.

--Evan

Jan 11, 2009 00:13

Canon5DIII + 7D + 40D + Some L + Some non L + Some Sigma + Some Tamron + other stuff....
Patiently awaiting a winning Lottery Ticket to afford all the toys I would really like :-P

LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
20,863 posts

Joined Mar 2005

Birmingham, UK
MORE INFO

It's a great lens: not to the standard of say the 400mm L but certainly competitive with the 100-400mm. I'd say, having owned both those zooms and the 150-500mm OS that the latter is the best option overall ... but you may need more speed than these three for sports. Depends on the sports and light. For wildlife and shooting all at a stop down I doubt anyone would see much difference. That's when the better image stabilisation and 500mm of the OS lens add value.

Jan 11, 2009 03:47

http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,472 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sigma Zoom Normal-Telephoto 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX DG HSM Autofocus Lens for Canon
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00271 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is tynez
673 guests, 711 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014