![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 132
|
I am sorry I could never find the answer to this question. ( I am still very new)
When you photograph say 2 people close-up where do you focus to get both faces very sharp? I know larger F-stop would gives better DOF and focusing on person's eyes sharpness. But I can figure out where to focus in case of 2-3 people. Thank you |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
You can shoot them at wider apertures if you shoot from a distance. But stopping down will help. Post an example shot and can then recommend where to focus.
__________________
Back to basics 5dc with 35L & Sigma 85mm f1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 132
|
Thank you for the reply. I am posting an example. This was kind of a snapshot but gives you an idea what I mean (hopefully). When I take pictures like this I always get one person's face sharper than the other. I try to focus on one person and recompose but it doesn't fix the problem. Where should I focus in this case?
Thanks again |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,106
|
What you mentioned in the first post is pretty much spot on. They're not in line with each other so it focuses either closer or further away. Obviously playing with a baby he'll be moving around often, but if you can move so that they're in line with each other when he's holding him up it should help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
Posts: 9,897
|
That looks ok to me re. the sharpness of both people. What aperture did you use? I routinely shoot at f/1.4-2, and I REALLy have to keep an eye on my composition to keep it from one person being really sharp, and the other person being a complete blur. I would he happy with the shot you posted. If you want them both to be sharper, not much you can do except (1)Keep them closer to being in the same focal plane, and (2)Use a smaller aperture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8
|
Hi Rishka,
I too have had this problem and it's so frustrating! As far as I can understand it, (and I could be totally wrong!) wherever you choose to focus (the eyes usually), the depth of field will extend 1/3 in front and 2/3 behind your focus point so what I usually do is focus on the eyes of whoever is nearest to the camera, so that the depth of field will then cover 1/3 in front of them, getting their nose etc in focus, and will also cover 2/3 behind them, getting the second person in focus (if your aperture is stopped down enough). In the example you posted I'd prob have focused on the baby's eyes as the baby is closest to the camera, and as you get more depth of field behind the focus point, it should hopefully cover your husband too. Not sure I've explained that v well but hope it makes sense and hope it works! (Also, I know ppl will disagree with me but I never use focus-recompose with my kids as they just move around too much, I manually select the nearest focus point) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
|
Rishka78, try to step down the lens F5.6 to F8 and try and focus at the midpoint of the subject.
When you are shooting at a wider angle <24mm you will get good depth of focus with F5.6. When you shoot at longer focal length you need smaller aperture >F5.6-F8. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 132
|
Thanks so much everybody! I will use your suggestions. This is one of the main thing I am struggling with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
|
Rishka; according to the Exif data, you shot this at F8 at 1/30 and lens at 42mm.
Here is where the problem comes in. On your camera, 42mm is longer than normal. (a normal lens for a crop body would be about 31mm) The longer you go, the less depth of field you will get when you are shooting up close like this. It appears that the baby's eyes are about 3-4 inches closer to the camera than hubby's. When shooting like this, try to have baby's and hubby's eyes on the same plane. Also, you might want to try F11 to get a bit more depth of field.
__________________
Hinson Artist tools: Canon 60D, 28/2.8, 100/2.8 Macro, Tamron 28-300 Macro Blog: www.jerrywhitephotography.com ________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 132
|
Guys, you are great! I've learned so much from you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 15
|
Is this really a DOF issue, or could it be motion blur from the low ss? Is this handheld, or with a tripod?
If you are shooting at f8 and 1/30, my guess is that you have sufficient DOF at f8. I'd suggest a tripod and something like f5.6 and 1/60, or f4 and 1/125. Depending on your ISO setting, you may want to bump it up to get a few more stops of shutter speed and/or aperture to work with. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
|
Ya know, I have to agree with lute..., in fact, on closer examination, the whole image seems just a bit soft.
__________________
Hinson Artist tools: Canon 60D, 28/2.8, 100/2.8 Macro, Tamron 28-300 Macro Blog: www.jerrywhitephotography.com ________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about focusing on multiple faces in portraits. | ronecoyote | General Photography Talk | 1 | 9th of July 2008 (Wed) 16:11 |
| 40D auto focusing distant small objects | Stefan A | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 12 | 13th of February 2008 (Wed) 13:37 |
| xt not focusing on white objects | Justiner | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 10 | 25th of May 2007 (Fri) 03:30 |
| Focusing and Shooting moving objects | TMR Design | Small Compact Digitals by Canon | 4 | 11th of September 2006 (Mon) 12:07 |
| trouble focusing on distant objects with a large aperture. | nayrto | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 18 | 13th of April 2006 (Thu) 18:08 |