LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Suggestion: Manual-Focus lenses subforum

FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff Forum Talk
Thread started 23 Jan 2009 (Friday) 23:51   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
SkedAddled
Goldmember
SkedAddled's Avatar
Joined Jul 2008
1,581 posts
West Michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

There's an awful lot of fine glass out there which is as old or older than I am, which also mounts to my EOS camera with the use of inexpensive adapters. Many of these lenses are still considered to be some of the finest examples of camera optics ever to be, even though they occasionally predate the second world war or earlier.

Yes, there are many arguments pro and con, yet it remains that many film 'purists'
have been giving these lenses new life by mounting them on their sparkling-new
digital cameras, and they are mostly raving about how much they love the lenses
from their 'lost eras' when used with modern digitals.

Carl Zeiss, Helios, Asahi/Takumar, Tamron, Soligor, Hanimar, Leica, Chinon, Olympus/Zuiko, Voightlander, Yashica, Jupiter -- They're all good lenses, and more.

I am confident that we have many manual-focus users right here on this same forum,
so why not open the forum to such endeavors? There are dedicated resources for this,
I know, but why shut this aspect out of the digital age? I hope to acquire one or two
SMC Takumar lenses, or a CZJ lens in my time. Maybe a Russian mirror lens, or a
M42-mount cinematic projector lens. Lots of possibilities, actually.

But what's keeping this aspect of lenses out of the fold?

Post #1, Jan 23, 2009 23:51:46


CraigΣ 10-20|SP 28-80 AD2|SP 60-300 AD2|Soligor 75-260 M42|Soligor 400 T4|Soligor C/D 500 T2 cat|Zuiko 50 1.8|Vivitar 28 2.8 OM|Hanimar 135 3.5 13-blade M42|Even more Manual-Focus Glass
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard?!?

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Perry ­ Ge
Batteries? We don't need no...
Perry Ge's Avatar
Joined Jul 2007
11,954 posts
Toronto/Hong Kong
[MORE/SHARE]

I'd be interested in this too, but I can see good reasons for not having such a subforum.

On a side-note, you are the ONLY other person I know (other than myself) who has a Hanimar 135mm M42 lens - f/2.8 or f/3.5 version? I have the f/3.5 Super "S" version that I got for $7 :lol:.

Post #2, Jan 24, 2009 00:02:40


Perry | flickrexternal link | C&C ALWAYS welcome | Gear
POTN Toronto | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky [READ THIS]

LOG IN TO REPLY
SkedAddled
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
SkedAddled's Avatar
Joined Jul 2008
1,581 posts
West Michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

perryge wrote in post #7175044external link
On a side-note, you are the ONLY other person I know (other than myself) who has a Hanimar 135mm M42 lens - f/2.8 or f/3.5 version? I have the f/3.5 Super "S" version that I got for $7 :lol:.

I paid a whopping $12 for my fully-manual f/3.5-22. It was 'old new stock,' and indeed arrived exactly as fresh from the factory in original packaging. ;)

Post #3, Jan 24, 2009 20:49:18


CraigΣ 10-20|SP 28-80 AD2|SP 60-300 AD2|Soligor 75-260 M42|Soligor 400 T4|Soligor C/D 500 T2 cat|Zuiko 50 1.8|Vivitar 28 2.8 OM|Hanimar 135 3.5 13-blade M42|Even more Manual-Focus Glass
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard?!?

LOG IN TO REPLY
Laramie
Still livin' the cowboylife
Laramie's Avatar
Joined Nov 2006
3,220 posts
Inland Empire, California
[MORE/SHARE]

I'd like to see it too. As I have gotten into manual focus Olympus Zuiko lenses, I'd love to see a subforum for MF stuff.

Post #4, Jan 30, 2009 21:22:39


5DIII | 40D | 17-40 f4L | Tamron 28-75 2.8 | 50 1.4 | 70-200 2.8L | Oly Zuiko 50 macro | Tamron 1.4x

LOG IN TO REPLY
Froggeh
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2008
339 posts
Sydney, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

I'd also like to see a subforum for MF stuff.

Post #5, Mar 16, 2009 00:15:44


5D & 50D | 17-40 f/4L | Asahi Pentax SMC Takumar 35 f/2 | Pentacon 135 f/2.8 Preset | Minolta Rokkor 50/1.4 and 58/1.4 | Tamron 90mm | 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS | 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
::John::
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2005
8,537 posts
Canberra, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

ok - 4 users out of 180,000+

As with other forums here, show that you have the numbers and interest from many of you.

The Celestial forum started because a dedicated group of Celestial photographers created a thread in one of the share forums and showed us it was a popular choice.

You could do the same in the Lens forum - create a thread and title it appropriately - and show us your stuff!

The Underwater photographers are also going through a similar scheme to see if they have the general board interest to sustain a forum of their own.

Best of luck, we'll be interested to see how it goes.

John

Post #6, Mar 16, 2009 00:42:10




LOG IN TO REPLY
Laramie
Still livin' the cowboylife
Laramie's Avatar
Joined Nov 2006
3,220 posts
Inland Empire, California
[MORE/SHARE]

A similar thread to what you suggested is ongoing in the "lens archive" I believe. Seems whenever somebody posts questions or samples about MF lenses, they seem to get lots of replies and there's a good amount of interest. I think it would help is searching/sorting through lens questions and topics as MF lenses become more popular.

::John:: wrote in post #7531688external link
ok - 4 users out of 180,000+

As with other forums here, show that you have the numbers and interest from many of you.

The Celestial forum started because a dedicated group of Celestial photographers created a thread in one of the share forums and showed us it was a popular choice.

You could do the same in the Lens forum - create a thread and title it appropriately - and show us your stuff!

The Underwater photographers are also going through a similar scheme to see if they have the general board interest to sustain a forum of their own.

Best of luck, we'll be interested to see how it goes.

John

Post #7, Mar 16, 2009 00:46:13


5DIII | 40D | 17-40 f4L | Tamron 28-75 2.8 | 50 1.4 | 70-200 2.8L | Oly Zuiko 50 macro | Tamron 1.4x

LOG IN TO REPLY
Froggeh
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2008
339 posts
Sydney, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

Hi John,

thanks for responding here too. simply put, MF users are currently discouraged from using the board. If we review/sample photo a lens, we don't want to 'junk up' the AF lens sample photo archive (for that's what it is, so everything is in one post there). After our first couple of lenses, we just move forums to talk about MF stuff, because it gets buried under a deluge of random questions (eg. title '70-200 IS or 70-200 non-IS'?)

Personally (having run a number of large forums), I'd suggest that these fora are created in order to allow these sub-sections of the comunity to thrive. If we don't have anywhere good to discuss things, how are we to sustain the 'MF-users' group feel, and pool information? As much as the search forum helps, it's a question of Signal vs. Noise.

Post #8, Mar 16, 2009 01:39:37


5D & 50D | 17-40 f/4L | Asahi Pentax SMC Takumar 35 f/2 | Pentacon 135 f/2.8 Preset | Minolta Rokkor 50/1.4 and 58/1.4 | Tamron 90mm | 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS | 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
Cream of the Crop
Pete's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
38,607 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Ok, here's an idea.

If people want to start a discussion thread about brand specific (Carl Zeiss, Helios, Asahi/Takumar, Tamron, Soligor, Hanimar, Leica, Chinon, Olympus/Zuiko, Voightlander, Yashica, Jupiter, whatever )MF lenses in the Lens section, then it would probably be a good idea to have a thread linking to those threads.

So, if someone's interested in a Takumar lens, they could go right to the Takumar thread and read/discuss. The sticky thread would be a placeholder/index for the lot of them (in the same way that the lens archive has an index). This idea proved useful in the bag review thread in the Accessories section

-=LINK=-

If someone wants to start up such an index thread (and is happy to maintain it), then we'll look at it and sticky it for you.

Post #9, Mar 16, 2009 04:10:26


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

LOG IN TO REPLY
borealis
Senior Member
borealis's Avatar
Joined May 2005
257 posts
yukon
[MORE/SHARE]

I've owned a few Hanimars....

Post #10, Mar 16, 2009 04:35:58


"There is no point in having sharp images when you've fuzzy ideas." - Godard
... go play...

LOG IN TO REPLY
borealis
Senior Member
borealis's Avatar
Joined May 2005
257 posts
yukon
[MORE/SHARE]

I'd be interested in the discussions.
5Dmk2 videographers using MF lenses would likely find it useful.

Post #11, Mar 16, 2009 04:37:48


"There is no point in having sharp images when you've fuzzy ideas." - Godard
... go play...

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)


LIST NEARBY THREADS
866 views & 0 likes for this thread
Suggestion: Manual-Focus lenses subforum
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff Forum Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00084 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
1030 guests, 815 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Madden5D3

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.