![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 419
|
Today I was playing around with several flashes and my Sekonic lightmeter L-358 and a question popped out. First I set my camera at ISO 200, f/8 and 1/60. Then I set my main light at 45 degree towards the subject and set its power until the flashmeter read f/8. Then I set the fill light. I adjusted its power until the Sekonic read f/5.6 (1 f/stop lower than the main light). After setting both lights, I took a reading of the two lights combined and the Sekonic read f/8 plus 7/10 (approximately that is f/10). To get a real f/8 with a shot of the two flashes combined, I needed to dial down the power of the two lights until I got an f/8 on the Sekonic. I think this is normal, for I have a DVD by Sekonic where there is a photographer stating the same effect.
However, I do not really understand why shooting two lights (one of which is underpowered) gives me more power than the main light. I would appreciate if anyone could explain that to me.
__________________
20D - 10-22mm - 17-85mm - 50 f/1.4 - 70-200 f/2.8L IS - 100mm Macro - 1.4x II - 420EX - Canon 550EX |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
Posts: 23,871
|
Think about it. Even though you're adding less light with the fill at 1 full stop lower than the main, aren't you still adding light? You can't add light and not see an increase in light, thus a smaller aperture reading on the meter. The fact that you are seeing 7/10 stop additional represents the small contribution to the exposure, but a contribution nonetheless.
__________________
Please call me Robert or Rob, not TMR Gear List & Feedback | The Lighting Academy "Art is the elimination of the unnecessary." - Pablo Picasso |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
I was playing with a light meter also this weekend, and faced some issues questions too.
In this example, aren't you still supposed to keep your camera at f/8 if you are looking for a correct exposure on the subject + some rim light? ( If that was what the OP was trying to achieve ).
__________________
- Tuomas Gustafsson My smugmug - ( still on the works ) My gear list / DOF calculator for Nokia phones With Canon you can... spend all your money on glass. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
If the second light overlaps the coverage area of the main light, you are adding to the light.
__________________
Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong. Gear List Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer Flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Light is like water...add more water, the bucket fills higher -- even when the flow rate from the smaller hose is a lot less than the main hose!
What most amateurs do not fundamentally understand is that if you were in a darkened room and opened the shutter (Bulb) and popped the flash 1 time, vs. 2 times, vs 4 times, vs. 8 times, vs 16 times, you are exposing the sensor/film to accumulating light that results in an exposure of 0EV, +1EV, +2EV, +3EV, and +4EV respectively. That is why the overall exposure is +0.7EV from your 1/60 f/8 single light reading. Bohdank was 100% right with his comment.
__________________
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php Last edited by Wilt : 2nd of February 2009 (Mon) at 10:20. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 419
|
I am getting the point. Thanks a lot. Question now is: What is the recommended workflow of lighting setup? Should I set first the main, then fill, then dial down both lights to match the flashmeter?
__________________
20D - 10-22mm - 17-85mm - 50 f/1.4 - 70-200 f/2.8L IS - 100mm Macro - 1.4x II - 420EX - Canon 550EX |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Read just the main. Then read just the fill. Use the readings to establish the contrast ratio of the lighting.
Read both lights together, set the aperture of the lens to that value. Shoot.
__________________
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
|
Nice! Thanks, somehow i was under the impression that the f/stop is adjusted by the main light. This makes actually much more sense..
__________________
- Tuomas Gustafsson My smugmug - ( still on the works ) My gear list / DOF calculator for Nokia phones With Canon you can... spend all your money on glass. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,174
|
Quote:
Quote:
If you want to shoot at a specific aperture, then IMHO Sito's post is the way to go. Once you have your ratio set up, reduce both strobes equally to the desired output/aperture, this will maintain the same ratio. (ie if your final meter reading is 7/10 over, reduce both strobes by 7/10) Having strobes with accurate incremental control is an advantage. If you tend to use similar set-ups, you can set your key light at the required amount that you normally need to drop (in this case7/10) from the beginning. This method will also assist, if your strobes do not have accurate incremental control. Hope this makes sense. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ABE, PA USA
Posts: 26,483
|
Or, you can just work the aperture values backwards. If you want the camera set to, say, f/8, and you want a 2:1 main-to-fill ratio, meter the main light for f/5.6 and 5/10 (or half a stop under f/8 ). Then meter the fill for f/4 and 5/10 (one and a half stop under f/8 ). The combined reading, assuming the main and fill overlap, will then be exactly f/8.
__________________
...Leo Last edited by PacAce : 2nd of February 2009 (Mon) at 16:49. Reason: fixed f/8 coming out as a smiley face :o\ |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,174
|
Thats what I meant in my last paragraph, but just maybe didn't put it into English very well
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
User is banned from forums
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 587
|
You forgot to mention that only main or only fill shoud be read with the dome down and directed towards the light and the resulting light with the dome up and pointed towards the camera. In my case it often happens that final resulting reading is lower than the main light. For example Main F8 hair light F4.5 the result F5.6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
Posts: 23,871
|
Not everyone meters as you're describing. With digital there are many (myself included) that meter for the highlights and the taking aperture is derived by metering towards the main source of illumination and not the lens.
These is always great debate and discussion over this and I don't want to see this turn into that debate again but if you're metering for highlights as I described then what you're describing does not occur.
__________________
Please call me Robert or Rob, not TMR Gear List & Feedback | The Lighting Academy "Art is the elimination of the unnecessary." - Pablo Picasso |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
User is banned from forums
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 587
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
Posts: 23,871
|
Hi Papa Carlo,
If I'm metering a single light source and no other strobes are firing I do not lower the dome. If I'm metering a light source and other lights are firing then I do lower the dome and will go as far as shielding the dome so as not to have contribution from those other sources. When I'm metering for my final taking aperture I have the dome raised.
__________________
Please call me Robert or Rob, not TMR Gear List & Feedback | The Lighting Academy "Art is the elimination of the unnecessary." - Pablo Picasso |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flash metering help | randy98mtu | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 28 | 24th of December 2007 (Mon) 22:43 |
| recompose with flash question, and flash metering Q | Scott6 | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 6 | 1st of December 2007 (Sat) 08:43 |
| Flash Metering | Cyth0n | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 5 | 10th of September 2007 (Mon) 05:08 |
| Flash metering. | totalbeginner | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 1 | 7th of April 2007 (Sat) 10:44 |
| Question of flash metering | J.A.F. Doorhof | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 29 | 1st of July 2005 (Fri) 16:00 |