![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,020
|
I have a Marking M10 and have been using it on my G2220EX tripod, but I want something lighter and a bit more compact and will hold a 1D + 70-200/2.8IS or 1D + 100-400IS with no issue. I really don't anticipate acquiring any longer/bigger lenses, but you never know. For simplicity sake, let's say I add the 1.4x TC onto those combinations.
I'd like my setup to be under 5 lbs. if possible. I doubt throwing on the M10 on the Gitzo traveler would make sense, but do you guys have any idea on which Gitzo would fit what I'm looking for?
__________________
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
You're going counter to the conventional recommendation in attempts to use 400mm lens with the combo you are looking for.
__________________
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,020
|
That's what I though, which was why I wanted to see if anyone on this site has found something like what I'm looking for. I know it big lenses and portability don't usually go hand in hand, but I was hoping to keep additional weight down on my backpack for hikes and snowboarding.
*sigh*
__________________
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Don't Hassle....
|
I don't think it is a matter of not finding the right model; you can't fight the basic laws of vibrations vs. focal lengths.
Since the EX model is aluminum, you'll obviously save weight by going CF. My Gitzo 3541LS (folds shorter than the 2541) and Markins M-10 is 5.7 pounds, for reference.
__________________
••Vancouver Wedding Photographer ••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
|
2 series would (just) work for a 100-400 IMO. (with good technique and circumstances).
Forget about adding a 1.4 TC however.
__________________
"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams Why Color Management. Color Problems? Click here. MySpace Get Colormanaged PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,320
|
I agree. I'm using a 2530 with the M10. I would not recommend going over 300mm on a regular bases. However with good long lens technique, I feel I am able to use the setup when I use my 300 + 1.4TC. If you use a 400+ focal length on a frequent basis, then I would recommend a 3 series Gitzo and an M20. If longer, then you would probably consider a gimbal on the 3 series.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,020
|
Ok, considering I would probably use the tripod more like a monopod in those long focal length situations I may end up goin with the 2530 or 2540 (or whatever equiv Gitzo has out now). Might go with the 4 section legs for compactness. I wish we had a Gitzo dealer nearby where I could check out the legs. Eventually, I might upgrade to a two tripod system. Get the Gitzo travel and Q3T, and grab a 3 series with an M20. For now, I'll compromise.
Thanks, guys.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Don't Hassle....
|
Look closely at the specs of the 3541LS and the 2541... you'll see very little where the 2-series is the better choice, I think. 3541LS has it beat in capacity AND folding length (it is smaller)... just a bit heavier. I was set on the 2541 until I compared them closely. Then you wouldn't have to re-sell in the future.
__________________
••Vancouver Wedding Photographer ••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,020
|
With the 3 series tripod, will my M10 ballhead be enough? I'm thinking it's more than enough.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Don't Hassle....
|
It is. It doesn't match at the base as the M20 is the intended head for 3-series but it works perfectly well. I have the 3540LS and the M10
![]() I'd get the M-20 if you intend to go 500mm +
__________________
••Vancouver Wedding Photographer ••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: Markins M10 or Q3, Kirk BH3, Gitzo tripod, Elinchrom | adamdewilde | Classifieds: Buy | 0 | 5th of October 2008 (Sun) 12:47 |
| M10 Ballhead w/Gitzo 2540 | marjnap | Accessories & Storage | 49 | 16th of April 2008 (Wed) 20:53 |
| Gitzo 1158, M10, what QR clamp, l-bracket? | marysia | Accessories & Storage | 0 | 10th of July 2007 (Tue) 15:32 |
| Markins M10 vs Gitzo 1377M | coorz | Accessories & Storage | 3 | 15th of March 2007 (Thu) 06:49 |