LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Canon 100mm macro F2.8 or Sigma 105mm F2.8 macro

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 09 Feb 2009 (Monday) 17:14   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Randy ­ McBum.
Senior Member
Randy McBum.'s Avatar
Joined Jan 2009
250 posts
Essex, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Hi all,

I have a very nice mate who lent me the Canon 100mm macro for long term whilst he sold his Camera.
I used this Lens not as often as I should as I payed nothing for such a long rental, he has just brought himself his new camera and wants this lens back (no surprise). I was very pleased with mostly all pictures produced with this lens and got along with it very well.
My question is I'm now looking to buy a macro lens, I'm on a tight budget and I was wondering if the Sigma 105mm macro F2.8 was worth a look as it is around £150 cheaper than the canon. I understand the Canon is a very good lens and you get what you pay for but is the sigma noticbly lower quality or is it worth buying.
(I'm looking for a macro lens which gives 1:1 Magnification if there is any other lens suggestions please post)

Many Thanks

Post #1, Feb 09, 2009 17:14:13


| Randy |
Canon 450D Gripped | Canon 18-55 IS | Canon 70-300 IS USM| Canon 50 II | Sigma 105 Macro | Canon 430EX II | Kenko ET DG | Benbo Trekker III | Benbo Mini Trekker | Manfrotto 190XPROB | Manfrotto MN681B | Manfrotto 486 RC2 | + Lighting Equipment, Sync's & Bags.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
KenjiS
Cream of the Crop
KenjiS's Avatar
Joined Oct 2008
20,002 posts
Buffalo, NY
[MORE/SHARE]

From what i understand, Optically the Sigma 105mm macro is pretty much even with the Canon, as is the Tamron 90mm macro [Some people say the Tamron is in fact a sharper lens but I say it might be sample variation]

The extra money in the canon is the quicker focusing motor, the Sigma and the Tamron are both a bit slower than the Canon and are NOT equipped with USMs...

Also neither are IF, meaning they extend out a bit when focusing...

But both are GREAT lenses definately worth a look :D

Post #2, Feb 09, 2009 17:32:23


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 5D Mark III, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 OS
Deviantartexternal link
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
xarqi's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
10,435 posts
Aotearoa/New Zealand
[MORE/SHARE]

The Sigma is pretty well respected here at POTN, so could be worth a look.
Your other option is the EF-S 60/2.8 macro.

Others will be along with more detailed answers soon, I'm sure.

Meanwhile, do check the image archive threads for these lenses. They are in a separate sub-forum and there should be a link at the top of the page.

P.S.

Hmmm - not quite - -->here's<-- the link.

Post #3, Feb 09, 2009 17:35:02




LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Bob
Goldmember
Joined May 2007
1,881 posts
Poitou-Charentes, France
[MORE/SHARE]

I've got both the Canon and Sigma versions. Nothing to choose between them IQ'wise for macro stuff with manual focus. The Canon is much quieter if you want to use AF.

Bob

Post #4, Feb 09, 2009 17:36:39 as a reply to KenjiS's post 4 minutes earlier.


1Dx (2), 5D3, 7D2, 5D2(590nm), 5D2(720nm) EF600 EF400 EF300 EF300 EF200 EF200-II EF180L EF135L EF100 EF85-II EF50L TS-E24L-II TS-E45 TS-E90 MP-E65 EF70-200-II EF24-70LII EF16-35/4 EF8-15 Zeiss 15/2.8 18/3.5 21/2.8 25/2 28/2 35/1.4 35/2 50/1.4 50/2 85/1.4 100/2 135/2 T/C's L-SC & a WIFE!

LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
RPCrowe's Avatar
Joined Nov 2005
7,383 posts
San Diego County, California, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I have the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 AF SP Macro

I got a wonderful buy, a few years ago, on a minty used Tamron 90mm f/2.8 AF SP Macro lens which cost me just over $100 (USD) plus a small shipping charge. This lens is fantastic and, despite the fact that it is an older model, provides exceptional image quality that is right up there with my "L" lenses. Tamron has issued a replacement macro lens and has added a "Di" designator to distinguish this newer model.

I would choose either the Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro or either of the two Tamron 90mm f/2.8 macro lenses over the Sigma because of problems with the reverse engineering of Sigma that can very well leave you with an obsolete lens which cannot be rechipped for newer Canon cameras.

I would NOT select the older Tamron 90mm f/2.5 "Adaptall" lens because that lens doesn't work well on Canon EOS cameras.

Post #5, Feb 09, 2009 17:44:30 as a reply to KenjiS's post 12 minutes earlier.


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/external link
EQUIPMENT: Two Canon 7D cameras plus Canon D60 camera modified for full-time IR; Tokina 12-24mm f/4, 50mm f/1.8 Mark-I, 17-55mm f/2.8 IS, Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Macro, 135mm f/2.8 Soft Focus, 70-200mm f/4L IS, 300mm f/4L IS, and 400mm f/5.6L lenses;

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Jannie
Goldmember
Joined Jan 2008
4,936 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I asked my sales guy at my camera store why they do not carry Sigma lenses and his comment was that they are generally very good but also brought up this "reverse engineering" thing about sometimes not being able to fit on newer cameras when they come out. I'd never heard of that before. Think also about how well a lens will resell if you decide to make some changes down the road. Otherwise, there are a lot of very satisfied Sigma lens users here on this forum and physically they look really well made and quite frankly a little better looking than many of the Canon lenses to me.

Post #6, Feb 09, 2009 18:40:48


Ms.Jannie
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it"!
1DMKIII, 85LII, 24-70L, 100-400L

LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
bohdank's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
14,060 posts
Montreal, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

The fact that the Sigma extends when focusing is a deal breaker for me. The Sigma 150 doesn't and is quite interesting, actually. Nevertheless I'm buying the Canon, when I get around to it. I've gotten very fond of ring USM.

Post #7, Feb 09, 2009 19:30:41


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographerexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
9,752 posts
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Randy McBum. wrote in post #7290210external link
(I'm looking for a macro lens which gives 1:1 Magnification if there is any other lens suggestions please post)

If working distance isn't an issue, your best value would be the Sigma 50mm f/2.8 macro. It will do 1:1 (unlike Canon's 50mm) and serves as a nice portrait lens, as well.

Post #8, Feb 09, 2009 19:47:37


Gear list
"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
Zeiss 35/2 for sale.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jman13
Cream of the Crop
Jman13's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
5,558 posts
Columbus, OH
[MORE/SHARE]

The Sigma 105 is an excellent lens. I have one for sale, if you're interested. (I have the Sigma 150 now which is also stellar). Optically, the 105 is fantastic...every bit as good as the Canon. The AF is slow and loud, though. However, I never found that an issue for macro shooting since 99% of macro shooting is done with manual focus anyway.

Post #9, Feb 09, 2009 20:28:20


Jordan Steele - http://www.jordansteel​e.comexternal link
Admiring Light - http://www.admiringlig​ht.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
Cream of the Crop
KenjiS's Avatar
Joined Oct 2008
20,002 posts
Buffalo, NY
[MORE/SHARE]

xarqi wrote in post #7290334external link
The Sigma is pretty well respected here at POTN, so could be worth a look.
Your other option is the EF-S 60/2.8 macro.

Others will be along with more detailed answers soon, I'm sure.

Meanwhile, do check the image archive threads for these lenses. They are in a separate sub-forum and there should be a link at the top of the page.

P.S.

Hmmm - not quite - -->here's<-- the link.

The EF-S 60 is a superb lens, but i found the working distance way too short and had issues getting my tripod positioned right to get the subject the way i wanted most of the time :(

Post #10, Feb 09, 2009 20:55:31


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 5D Mark III, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 OS
Deviantartexternal link
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Randy ­ McBum.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Randy McBum.'s Avatar
Joined Jan 2009
250 posts
Essex, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

xarqi wrote in post #7290334external link
The Sigma is pretty well respected here at POTN, so could be worth a look.
Your other option is the EF-S 60/2.8 macro.

Others will be along with more detailed answers soon, I'm sure.

Meanwhile, do check the image archive threads for these lenses. They are in a separate sub-forum and there should be a link at the top of the page.

P.S.

Hmmm - not quite - -->here's<-- the link.

Yes Agree the 60mm macro is good but im looking for 1:1 Magnification and 60mm doesnt get that.

Post #11, Feb 10, 2009 11:15:02


| Randy |
Canon 450D Gripped | Canon 18-55 IS | Canon 70-300 IS USM| Canon 50 II | Sigma 105 Macro | Canon 430EX II | Kenko ET DG | Benbo Trekker III | Benbo Mini Trekker | Manfrotto 190XPROB | Manfrotto MN681B | Manfrotto 486 RC2 | + Lighting Equipment, Sync's & Bags.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Randy ­ McBum.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Randy McBum.'s Avatar
Joined Jan 2009
250 posts
Essex, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks all,
these are all very good points and have helped quite alot.
the sigma seems to be the one as im not worried about Re-sell value.
But you never know i might get lucky and be able to afford my own Canon 100mm.

Post #12, Feb 10, 2009 11:20:45


| Randy |
Canon 450D Gripped | Canon 18-55 IS | Canon 70-300 IS USM| Canon 50 II | Sigma 105 Macro | Canon 430EX II | Kenko ET DG | Benbo Trekker III | Benbo Mini Trekker | Manfrotto 190XPROB | Manfrotto MN681B | Manfrotto 486 RC2 | + Lighting Equipment, Sync's & Bags.

LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
bohdank's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
14,060 posts
Montreal, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

Randy McBum. wrote in post #7295701external link
Yes Agree the 60mm macro is good but im looking for 1:1 Magnification and 60mm doesnt get that.

Yes it does.

Post #13, Feb 10, 2009 12:03:09


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographerexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Warl0rd
Goldmember
Warl0rd's Avatar
Joined Aug 2008
1,758 posts
Portugal
[MORE/SHARE]

for canon the best is the 100mm macro

Post #14, Feb 10, 2009 12:11:57


Paulo
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/warl0rdexternal link
Canon 450D (XSi) + Grip | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 100mm Macro | MP-E 65mm 1-5X | EF-S 18-55 IS | EF-S 55-250 IS | Takumar 55mm 1.8 | MT-24EX | Metz 48-AF1 | YN460 II | Kenko DG Auto ET | SlingShot 100 AW & Mitsai JDC195 | Manfrotto 190XPROB + 484RC2

LOG IN TO REPLY
BscPhoto
Senior Member
BscPhoto's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
625 posts
East Haven, CT
[MORE/SHARE]

It will take me forever to list the good things about the canon 100mm 2.8
I use it for many applications, if you are on a crop sensor it becomes a good medium telephoto lens and on a full frame it is a great overall prime lens for portraits to flowers.

I have had a few sigma lenses and I just don't like them as much, the focus isn't quite as fast and it's just not a canon. The one thing that makes sigma a really good choice is their lenses have a 4 year warranty.

Build and feel of the canon is better too

Post #15, Feb 10, 2009 12:41:47 as a reply to Warl0rd's post 29 minutes earlier.


•MEGAPIXELS are OVERRATED•

BSCphoto.comexternal link
Photography Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
2,817 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon 100mm macro F2.8 or Sigma 105mm F2.8 macro
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00148 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1017 guests, 825 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Chubbyluck

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.