-=FlexNR=- Noise Removal Action for 1D MarkIII (now available! ) - Page 4

JBF · 27th of April 2009 (Mon)

If Pix sees that so many like his noise thingy, then maybe he would want to sell it. Not give it away without his permission.

drisley · 28th of April 2009 (Tue)

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBF

If Pix sees that so many like his noise thingy, then maybe he would want to sell it. Not give it away without his permission.

Which is why I tried to contact him a couple months before posting. He never had a problem with sharing this action, and he also never said he wanted to sell it either. He would share it with anybody who wanted it. He's a great guy!

However, if he did sell the action, and make more for other cameras, I would be all for him selling it. I would be first in line to buy.

anglefire · 28th of April 2009 (Tue)

Drisley has very kindly run one of my images through the action - as I don't yet have the software required.

I am so impressed that I thought I would post the results here, together with the full size image.

First the full size and details. (This is the one from Drisley)

ISO6400, 1/200, f4 @ 70mm

This is part of the original I processed in ACR, compared to pretty much the same part of the image produced by the action - sorry it's a bit wide - hope the mods don't mind too much.

http://www.general.colston-online.co.uk/Comparison.jpg

datadump · 28th of April 2009 (Tue)

h o l y c r p

n i c e

drisley · 28th of April 2009 (Tue)

Yes it's amazing.
And this is a worst case scenario... ISO6400 with indoor lighting.
Yet, the image reatains good detail, and looks natural... no mottled flat look.

nicksan · 29th of April 2009 (Wed)

Drisley,
You need to give me a 101 on which action to use.
Still a little confused by all the things in the action.

For ACR->PSCS4 workflow, what exactly needs to be run in the list of actions?

I am very impressed by these samples. Simply AMAZING!!!

Thanks!
Nick

Quote:

Originally Posted by drisley

Yes it's amazing.
And this is a worst case scenario... ISO6400 with indoor lighting.
Yet, the image reatains good detail, and looks natural... no mottled flat look.

Lazuka · 29th of April 2009 (Wed)

Just wish somebody would make this for mac :X

mbellot · 29th of April 2009 (Wed)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lazuka

Just wish somebody would make this for mac :X

One more reason to dump Jobs' boat anchor and drink Uncle Bill's Insanity Sauce.

Lazuka · 29th of April 2009 (Wed)

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbellot

One more reason to dump Jobs' boat anchor and drink Uncle Bill's Insanity Sauce.

lolololol

datadump · 29th of April 2009 (Wed)

so far every iso3200-6400 shot that i fed into this new NR process, was with perfect exposure.

i'm going to see how it works if u miss exposure be like -1 or -2 stops. that is the true test

drisley · 29th of April 2009 (Wed)

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbellot

One more reason to dump Jobs' boat anchor and drink Uncle Bill's Insanity Sauce.

LOLOL

drisley · 29th of April 2009 (Wed)

Quote:

Originally Posted by datadump

so far every iso3200-6400 shot that i fed into this new NR process, was with perfect exposure.

i'm going to see how it works if u miss exposure be like -1 or -2 stops. that is the true test

It works well. If you do so, remember to use the HIGHER ISO in the action. IE, if you underexpose an ISO3200 shot, use maybe the ISO4000 or ISO5000 action, and don't recover until after you have processed the RAW with the NR action. At least, that works best for me. I've recovered ISO3200 shots up to 1 stop and they are clean as a whistle.

drisley · 29th of April 2009 (Wed)

Quote:

Originally Posted by nicksan

Drisley,
You need to give me a 101 on which action to use.
Still a little confused by all the things in the action.

For ACR->PSCS4 workflow, what exactly needs to be run in the list of actions?

I am very impressed by these samples. Simply AMAZING!!!

Thanks!
Nick

Oh sorry Nicksan, forgot about you.
For ACR, use the LR actions for the particular ISO you shot.

datadump · 29th of April 2009 (Wed)

Quote:

Originally Posted by drisley

It works well. If you do so, remember to use the HIGHER ISO in the action. IE, if you underexpose an ISO3200 shot, use maybe the ISO4000 or ISO5000 action, and don't recover until after you have processed the RAW with the NR action. At least, that works best for me. I've recovered ISO3200 shots up to 1 stop and they are clean as a whistle.

oh thanks.. i wouldnt have done that if u didnt mention

versedmb · 29th of April 2009 (Wed)

Damn! Someone needs to come up with an action like this for the 5D.

27th of April 2009 (Mon)	#46
JBF Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Lexington, KY Posts: 1,470	Re: 1D Mark III Digic Pix Noise Removal Action! If Pix sees that so many like his noise thingy, then maybe he would want to sell it. Not give it away without his permission. __________________ [font="Comic Sans MS"]JBF Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 7D, Canon 1D Mark IIN, Canon 1D Mark IV, Canon 24-105L f/4, Canon 35L 1.4, Canon 200L f/2.8, Canon 70-200L II IS f/2.8, Canon 300L f/2.8IS, 580ex Flash, 430ex Flash, 1.4X Converter. Bunch of other crap! I want the new 500mmL and the 200L f/2.0

28th of April 2009 (Tue)	#48
anglefire Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK Posts: 392 IMAGE EDITING OK	Re: 1D Mark III Digic Pix Noise Removal Action! Drisley has very kindly run one of my images through the action - as I don't yet have the software required. I am so impressed that I thought I would post the results here, together with the full size image. First the full size and details. (This is the one from Drisley) ISO6400, 1/200, f4 @ 70mm This is part of the original I processed in ACR, compared to pretty much the same part of the image produced by the action - sorry it's a bit wide - hope the mods don't mind too much. http://www.general.colston-online.co.uk/Comparison.jpg __________________ Mark Digital Photo Group My Website 1D Mk III, 5D, 350D, 17-40f/4 L, 24-105f/4 LIS, 70-200f/4 L, 400mm f/5.6L, 100mm f/2.8 Macro LIS, 50mm f/1.8, 85mm f/1.8, 60mm f/2.8 Macro, 420EX, 580EXII. Last edited by Pete : 20th of May 2009 (Wed) at 09:32. Reason: image too large

28th of April 2009 (Tue)	#49
datadump Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 1,910	Re: 1D Mark III Digic Pix Noise Removal Action! h o l y c r p n i c e

28th of April 2009 (Tue)	#50
drisley "What a Tool I am" Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 8,695	Re: 1D Mark III Digic Pix Noise Removal Action! Yes it's amazing. And this is a worst case scenario... ISO6400 with indoor lighting. Yet, the image reatains good detail, and looks natural... no mottled flat look. __________________

29th of April 2009 (Wed)	#52
Lazuka User is banned from forums Join Date: May 2008 Location: in a movie studio, in full production. Posts: 5,639 IMAGE EDITING OK	Re: 1D Mark III Digic Pix Noise Removal Action! Just wish somebody would make this for mac :X

29th of April 2009 (Wed)	#60
versedmb Goldmember Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 4,448 IMAGE EDITING OK	Re: 1D Mark III Digic Pix Noise Removal Action! Damn! Someone needs to come up with an action like this for the 5D. __________________ Gear List Michael

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Noise Ninja vs. CS3's noise removal filter	GM_of_OLC	RAW, Post Processing and Printing	12	22nd of July 2008 (Tue) 23:48