LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


24-70mm lens for all around outdoor portraits...going to Australia

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 25 Apr 2009 (Saturday) 11:09   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Kauaicrazed
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2007
778 posts
Orange County, Ca
[MORE/SHARE]

Ok, so I usually have my 50mm 1.8 that I shoot portraits with but I hate that I have to move back and forth to get a good frame. When I am on vacation I usually bring my 28-105mm and it's light and still can get portraits of my kids with scenic b/g. But the pics are not as sharp as my 50mm. But what about a 24-70mm? Would I be happy with this one? I am going to Australia for a few months and mainly will take pics of my kids but also want to incorporate the scenery.

Any samples would be greatly appreciated! TIA!

Post #1, Apr 25, 2009 11:09:44




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Fernando
Goldmember
Fernando's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
1,616 posts
Round Rock, TX
[MORE/SHARE]

Kauaicrazed wrote in post #7801480external link
Ok, so I usually have my 50mm 1.8 that I shoot portraits with but I hate that I have to move back and forth to get a good frame. When I am on vacation I usually bring my 28-105mm and it's light and still can get portraits of my kids with scenic b/g. But not pics are not as sharp as my 50mm. But what about a 24-70mm? Would I be happy with this one? I am going to Australia for a few months and mainly will take pics of my kids but also want to incorporate the scenery.

Any samples would be greatly appreciated! TIA!

Although it completely duplicates your existing FLs have you considered the 24-105 f/4L? Great lens often considered the perfect vacation lens.

-F

Post #2, Apr 25, 2009 11:17:33


Fuji convert - Ping me if you have any Fuji gear or legacy glass you're moving.

LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
gasrocks's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
13,431 posts
Portage, Wisconsin USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Maybe you should force yourself to move back and forth more often. Only you know what range of a zoom will do what you need. How does the 28-105 work? If you need that range and just better IQ, then the 24-70 is one choice. May I also suggest you rent a new lens for your trip instead of buying?

Post #3, Apr 25, 2009 11:18:29


GEAR LIST
_______________

LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_p
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2008
675 posts
Kansas City
[MORE/SHARE]

What do you WANT to like about the 24-70? If its aperture, yes perhaps. But many folks (such as myself) feel as though it's pretty soft wide open.

Post #4, Apr 25, 2009 13:14:30




LOG IN TO REPLY
superstes
Goldmember
superstes's Avatar
Joined May 2007
1,376 posts
Southern France
[MORE/SHARE]

dave_p wrote in post #7801919external link
But many folks (such as myself) feel as though it's pretty soft wide open.

I'm interested in this lens so doing some research, is it soft wide open in all shooting conditions or is it only soft in a specific condition.

Thanks

Post #5, Apr 25, 2009 13:36:09




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
Joined May 2005
22,035 posts
silicon valley
[MORE/SHARE]

dave_p wrote in post #7801919external link
What do you WANT to like about the 24-70? If its aperture, yes perhaps. But many folks (such as myself) feel as though it's pretty soft wide open.

mine isn't soft wide open. in fact it's pretty darn sharp.

ed rader

Post #6, Apr 25, 2009 13:45:09


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/external link
http://erader.zenfolio​.com/external link
5D3, SL1, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L, 35f2 IS, 24mm f2.8 ef-s, 15mm FE (sigma), 270ex II, gitzo, markins, benro

LOG IN TO REPLY
laydros
Senior Member
laydros's Avatar
Joined Jan 2009
444 posts
Raleigh, NC
[MORE/SHARE]

superstes wrote in post #7801999external link
I'm interested in this lens so doing some research, is it soft wide open in all shooting conditions or is it only soft in a specific condition.

Thanks

I spend way too much time reading this stuff, and people seem a little disappointed in this lens compared to some others, like the 17-55, or the 70-200s. I think it may be that the lens is a 9.5 on a scale of 10, but considering it is kinda the flagship of the L series, people feel it should be a 10.

Bear in mind that Sony's CZ 24-70 and Nikon's 24-70 both cost about 50% more.

Edit: I think if you don't need the speed, the 24-105 is a better travel lens because of the better range, less weight, and IS. If your subject is stationary and you don't need shallow DOF, you can probably get lower shutter speed shots out of the 24-105, because IS gets you more than 1 stop.

Post #7, Apr 25, 2009 13:48:57


Jason Hamilton - flickrexternal link - Twitterexternal link - laydros.orgexternal link
Canon 5D, 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 USM, 35 f/2, 50 f/1.8 II, 85mm f/1.8 USM, 70-210 f/3.5-4.5 USM, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 430EX
Nikon FE, 35/2, 50/1.8, 105/2.5 and Mamiya C220 Complete Gear List.

LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
Joined May 2005
22,035 posts
silicon valley
[MORE/SHARE]

laydros wrote in post #7802062external link
I spend way too much time reading this stuff, and people seem a little disappointed in this lens compared to some others, like the 17-55, or the 70-200s. I think it may be that the lens is a 9.5 on a scale of 10, but considering it is kinda the flagship of the L series, people feel it should be a 10.

Bear in mind that Sony's CZ 24-70 and Nikon's 24-70 both cost about 50% more.

because most use 1.6 crop cameras and the 17-55 IS is sharper @ f2.8 and provides a more useful range :D.

many around here talk about the 17-40L like it's dog poop because they've never used it on a FF camera where the 17-55 IS or third party options won't work.

ed rader

Post #8, Apr 25, 2009 13:53:47


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/external link
http://erader.zenfolio​.com/external link
5D3, SL1, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L, 35f2 IS, 24mm f2.8 ef-s, 15mm FE (sigma), 270ex II, gitzo, markins, benro

LOG IN TO REPLY
blam
Goldmember
Joined Sep 2006
1,895 posts
Edmonton, AB, CAN
[MORE/SHARE]

im personally not overly happy with the 24-70L

its a great lens, but i expect more for the high price of admission.

Post #9, Apr 25, 2009 13:56:04


Canon 5D MKII
EF 16-35 F2.8L II | EF 70-200 F2.8L IS | EF 50mm F1.2L | EF 100mm F2.8 Macro
430EX II | 580EX II
http://www.onthelam.caexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
superstes
Goldmember
superstes's Avatar
Joined May 2007
1,376 posts
Southern France
[MORE/SHARE]

I have one that mine if i part with 700 euros thats 630 quid or $926 conversion made with XE.

Seems like a fair price.

Post #10, Apr 25, 2009 13:56:32




LOG IN TO REPLY
superstes
Goldmember
superstes's Avatar
Joined May 2007
1,376 posts
Southern France
[MORE/SHARE]

ed rader wrote in post #7802087external link
because most use 1.6 crop cameras and the 17-55 IS is sharper @ f2.8 and provides a more useful range :D.

ed rader

Hi ed

Can the 24-70 be coxed to the same sharpness on a 1.6 or is this unachievable.

Post #11, Apr 25, 2009 14:25:00




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
Joined May 2005
22,035 posts
silicon valley
[MORE/SHARE]

superstes wrote in post #7802187external link
Hi ed

Can the 24-70 be coxed to the same sharpness on a 1.6 or is this unachievable.

the sensor size shouldn't matter. my 24-70L was very sharp on my 20d. i used it more for portraits of people and animals then because of the crop factor.

ed rdaer

Post #12, Apr 25, 2009 14:35:44


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/external link
http://erader.zenfolio​.com/external link
5D3, SL1, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L, 35f2 IS, 24mm f2.8 ef-s, 15mm FE (sigma), 270ex II, gitzo, markins, benro

LOG IN TO REPLY
superstes
Goldmember
superstes's Avatar
Joined May 2007
1,376 posts
Southern France
[MORE/SHARE]

ed

Do you feel that the 17-55 IS would have been sharper on your 20d or could you get the same results with the 24-70.

Thanks again.

Post #13, Apr 25, 2009 14:51:20




LOG IN TO REPLY
scott ­ stokes
Senior Member
scott stokes's Avatar
Joined May 2004
642 posts
cumming,GA
[MORE/SHARE]

The 24-70 is a great lens.I have thought about the 24-105 for a walkaround len,but that would be something else for me to carry on the plane.(I always take all of my camera lenses)

Post #14, Apr 25, 2009 15:47:21 as a reply to superstes's post 56 minutes earlier.


50d ,50 1.8,420ex,,tameron 19-35,tamron28-75,sigma70-200 2.8,bigma,24-70L

LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
SkipD's Avatar
Joined Dec 2002
19,852 posts
Southeastern WI, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Kauaicrazed wrote in post #7801480external link
Ok, so I usually have my 50mm 1.8 that I shoot portraits with but I hate that I have to move back and forth to get a good frame.

You might want to read our tutorial on controlling perspective in your images. I think you will find it quite useful, especially the last part of my post #1.

Post #15, Apr 25, 2009 16:27:36


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and almost 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
965 views & 0 likes for this thread
24-70mm lens for all around outdoor portraits...going to Australia
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00184 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1047 guests, 816 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is LionPlusL

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.