![]() |
|
|||||||
| sponsored links |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 24
|
has anyone seen this:
http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/27/c...-of-fourth-di/ http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/27/c...-of-fourth-di/ Now, my not even a week old G10 has the serial number in line with what they are reporting. Also, there seems to be a mark on the LCD side of the battery cover. Here is a pic of that: ![]() [click for full size] Does that look like the mark they may be talking about? |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Living in a Marshist regime
|
Very interesting. Thanks for reporting. My camera falls into that serial # range but I have not had any lines show up nor have a read about anyone having that problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
Arghl... Seems as if i have to sent mine to the service center.
Thanks for the info. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,910
|
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...=2112&id=57370
Are any of you affected by this recall? pisses me offf!! i just had a major fiasco with canon canada about my 1D mark III recall which had to be sent TWICE because of incompetence. Now this. Last edited by rpolitsr : 28th of April 2009 (Tue) at 18:19. Reason: fix title after merge |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
Yes, I'm not a happy camper either !
I got the G10 thinking it would be hassel free and not have to deal with dirty sensors, firmware / hardware updates ect... I'm still trying to figure out what the repair entails ? Are they replacing the sensor or replacing the entire camera ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 8,809
|
It looks like the mark on the LCD side is related to an old issue according to this:
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...=2112&id=57370
__________________
connecticut wedding photographer |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,910
|
Weird. at least this time, when creating a repair order, it sugests to send it to Whitby ontario rather than mississauga (where i had the 1D fiasco)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
I just checked my G10....it's an affected one. Guess it's off to Canon land..
Tom
__________________
mark iin; mark iid(S); 7d; G10: Canon 17-40, nifty 50, Canon 24-70L, Canon 10-22, Canon 70-200/2.8 L II, 300 2.8, 400/5.6, L 135, Canon 85/1.8: Canon 100 macro, tubes, Canon 1.4 tele conv. =======>>> play W.A.I.N. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,910
|
dejavu here.
this is the third time a canon's gone back to service center in 2 months now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 24
|
yea, I already checked, and the mark on mine is indeed on the LENS side, not the LCD lol. I confused myself apparently lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
|
Just updated my Software all ok. I will wait and see about sending my G10 away. May wait a while in case there is another update for something to come. Thats my luck, send it away, wait 6 weeks, only to find another recall. lol. I don't think the recalls expire too soon if ever.
__________________
Canon 7D, Canon 400D, Canon G10, Canon 24 - 70 lens, Canon 50 1.8 lens, Tamron 55-200, Canon 100mm Macro, Canon 10 - 22 Wide angle, Canon 90 - 300mm, Canon 430EX Speedlite. Photoshop Elements 8. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
User is banned from forums
|
'Among products with the serial numbers described above, if there is a marking on the lens side inside the battery cover like the one in the image below, the issue has already been corrected, and you may continue to use your camera as is with no further action required.'
Nice of them to tell me before I bought it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Living in a Marshist regime
|
I wont be sending mine in unless I have a problem. I printed out a copy of the recall and as far as I'm concerned there is no expiration date on it. This way if I have a dust issue once I'm out of warranty I will send in my camera for the line recall and avoid paying a cleaning fee for an issue that Canon refuses to fix.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Goldmember
|
Found this, you G10 people may be interested. From Canon today.
USA: http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...=2112&id=57370 UK: http://www.canon.co.uk/Support/Consu...type=important
__________________
David: Canon EOS 400D - Canon EF70-300mm f/4-55.6 IS USM -Sigma 17-70 F2.8-4.5 DC Macro - Sigma 50-500 'Bigma' - Speedlite 580EX 11 - Better Beamer Have patience. All things are difficult before they become easy Last edited by rpolitsr : 28th of April 2009 (Tue) at 18:21. Reason: fix title after merge |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 68
|
My serial # indicated that it was an affected G10, however, it had the mark that indicates that the problem was corrected. It is about 3-4 weeks old now.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Panoramic hardware for G10 | leegreen | Canon G-series Digital Cameras | 2 | 14th of December 2008 (Sun) 01:25 |
| G10 Video problems - Is my G10 broken or? | johnz | Canon G-series Digital Cameras | 2 | 26th of November 2008 (Wed) 01:24 |
| Undecided Choice G10 / GX200 and My reply + comparison shots G10/GX/LX/G1 etc. | gxnevin | Canon G-series Digital Cameras | 0 | 25th of November 2008 (Tue) 22:51 |
| Sigma Service Notice / Notice to Canon 40D owners | Stormin_24 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 3 | 29th of May 2008 (Thu) 19:35 |
| EF 70-300 official Service Notice [ e.g. - RECALL ! ] | ibdb | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 117 | 22nd of July 2006 (Sat) 15:28 |