Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing
Thread started 25 May 2009 (Monday) 14:50
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Picasa's workflow > Lightroom

 
c2thew
Goldmember
c2thew's Avatar
3,929 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Not enough minerals.
May 25, 2009 14:50 |  #1

For quick touchups, I honestly feel that picasa outshines lightroom by huge bounds for it's easy to use interface. Rather than spending 3-5 minutes on each photo, i can do it in less than 30 seconds. In lightroom, you do get more control over colors and finer details, but when it comes to speed and time spent sitting away on a computer.... picasa wins.

i do have lightroom but i just feel like it's a chore to use. when i find a picture that i really want to keep as a keeper, i will turn to lightroom. other than that, it kind of sits on my hard drive, neglected.


Flickrexternal link |Gear|The-Digital-Pictureexternal link|The $6 mic | MAGIC LANTERNexternal link | Welding Filter
Go Support Magic Lantern 2.3!!

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,705 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
May 25, 2009 15:31 |  #2

Interesting, I've never used Picasa. But, Does it have a RAW processor, or are you shooting jpegs. Since LR was developed with RAW in mind, it has a very different approach from editors designed around "normal" image files like jpeg and tiff that already have things burned into them.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
c2thew
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
c2thew's Avatar
3,929 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Not enough minerals.
May 25, 2009 15:37 |  #3

i shoot in both raw and jpeg and still find the quick and easy to use interface that much easier to use. If picasa ever decided to add on more manual color controls, I would buy it, even though it is a free to use program.


Flickrexternal link |Gear|The-Digital-Pictureexternal link|The $6 mic | MAGIC LANTERNexternal link | Welding Filter
Go Support Magic Lantern 2.3!!

LOG IN TO REPLY
c2thew
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
c2thew's Avatar
3,929 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Not enough minerals.
May 25, 2009 15:51 |  #4

what i like about picasa's crop feature is that it actually gives three suggestions to give you an idea of how you should crop it. it's algorithm works very well, which gives you a split second on how to reframe your cropped shots.

i really do hope they come out with a picasa pro edition


Flickrexternal link |Gear|The-Digital-Pictureexternal link|The $6 mic | MAGIC LANTERNexternal link | Welding Filter
Go Support Magic Lantern 2.3!!

LOG IN TO REPLY
sgogula
Senior Member
738 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Portland, OR
May 25, 2009 15:56 as a reply to c2thew's post |  #5

I think Picasa doesn't support RAW.


Canon 50D|70-200 2.8 IS II |Sigma 17-50 OS| Canon 85mm 1.8| Canon 50mm f1.8 II |430 EX II Speedlite| Manfrotto 055XPROB| Cullmann head| Adobe CS5

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,705 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
May 25, 2009 15:56 |  #6

c2thew wrote in post #7985620external link
i shoot in both raw and jpeg and still find the quick and easy to use interface that much easier to use. If picasa ever decided to add on more manual color controls, I would buy it, even though it is a free to use program.

So are you saying that Picasa processes/develops your RAW files?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
c2thew
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
c2thew's Avatar
3,929 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Not enough minerals.
May 25, 2009 16:11 |  #7

"So are you saying that Picasa processes/develops your RAW files?"

yes.


Flickrexternal link |Gear|The-Digital-Pictureexternal link|The $6 mic | MAGIC LANTERNexternal link | Welding Filter
Go Support Magic Lantern 2.3!!

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,705 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
May 25, 2009 16:14 |  #8

c2thew wrote in post #7985827external link
"So are you saying that Picasa processes/develops your RAW files?"

yes.

Ah, cool, I didn't know that. I'm quite happy with pretty much spending all my time in Lightroom, but it's nice to know about the other things you can use!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
c2thew
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
c2thew's Avatar
3,929 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Not enough minerals.
May 25, 2009 16:44 |  #9

heheh. give picasa a try, and i bet you'd be hard pressed to use lightroom as much.

http://picasa.google.c​om/external link

the only downside of picasa is that it doesn't save your metadata when it transfers your file into it's software and also the lack of manual controls. but for quick editing, picasa is awesome


Flickrexternal link |Gear|The-Digital-Pictureexternal link|The $6 mic | MAGIC LANTERNexternal link | Welding Filter
Go Support Magic Lantern 2.3!!

LOG IN TO REPLY
CAL ­ Imagery
Goldmember
CAL Imagery's Avatar
3,375 posts
Joined Apr 2008
O-H
May 25, 2009 17:35 |  #10

I just watched a video of Picasa by Google on Youtube and it looks very impressive. But people with good workflows and want more than very basic functions and adjustments will still use ACR, LR, or PS. That said, Picasa looks like it should be getting more looks than what it's getting; especially since it's free!


Christian

LOG IN TO REPLY
Paul ­ Li
Goldmember
Paul Li's Avatar
1,144 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Long Island
May 25, 2009 18:04 |  #11

c2thew wrote in post #7985302external link
For quick touchups, I honestly feel that picasa outshines lightroom by huge bounds for it's easy to use interface. Rather than spending 3-5 minutes on each photo, i can do it in less than 30 seconds. In lightroom, you do get more control over colors and finer details, but when it comes to speed and time spent sitting away on a computer.... picasa wins.

i do have lightroom but i just feel like it's a chore to use. when i find a picture that i really want to keep as a keeper, i will turn to lightroom. other than that, it kind of sits on my hard drive, neglected.

+1
"I'm feeling lucky" does wonders for P&S snapshots.
Straighten, crop and retouch tools work great.
Easy to adjust fill light and shadows...
and it's free...


Flickrexternal link
XS,AE-1,50 f1.8,430EX II+V4's,18-55IS,FD 50mm
Leave the IS on

LOG IN TO REPLY
cicopo
Goldmember
cicopo's Avatar
Joined Mar 2007
Ottawa, Ont, Canada
May 25, 2009 18:36 |  #12

I've used Picasa for years and do most of my normal editing with it. I've tried Lightroom several times & just never found a need for it. When I need more than Picasa can do I use DPP and then if even more is needed I go to Photoshop. I likely do 90% of my editing in Picasa.


A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.
Cozumel travel & dive photos
www.picasaweb.google.c​om/CozumelTimeCapsulesexternal link
Radio Control Event albums www.picasaweb.google.c​om/tcprcphotosexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
c2thew
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
c2thew's Avatar
3,929 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Not enough minerals.
May 25, 2009 19:07 as a reply to cicopo's post |  #13

90% sounds about right. speed and interface is key for me. when i try to navigate through lightroom, it just feels like added blotage. too many clicks to adjust one simple aspect that picasa handles in a snap. anywho just wanted to rant.


Flickrexternal link |Gear|The-Digital-Pictureexternal link|The $6 mic | MAGIC LANTERNexternal link | Welding Filter
Go Support Magic Lantern 2.3!!

LOG IN TO REPLY
skywalkerbeth
Senior Member
643 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Aug 13, 2009 15:50 |  #14

What is your normal workflow? Do you hit "I feel lucky" a lot, or not?


Canon 7D, 30D, G1X Mark II, S90, SD800IS | Canon 35mm 1.4L | Canon 24-105 F4L IS | Polarizers | Canon 100mm F2.8 macro |Lowepro Slingshot 200 | Gitzo 1550T Tripod with 1780qr head | Remote | Diffuser
My Blog: http://skywalkerbeth.b​logspot.com/external link
My site: www.compassrosegalleri​es.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,593 views & 0 likes for this thread
Picasa's workflow > Lightroom
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0023 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is MrGlitch
733 guests, 543 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015