LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Tripod for landscapes?

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Nature & Landscapes Talk
Thread started 05 Jun 2009 (Friday) 11:44   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
juanpafer
Goldmember
juanpafer's Avatar
Joined May 2009
1,733 posts
Louisville, KY
[MORE/SHARE]

What am I missing here?
Everyone talks about a good tripod as a must for several types of photography. I got one a few months ago and have been very happy with the results in macro, night photography, etc.
Everyone recomends a tripod for landscapes also, and here is where I get confused. If you have decent light, f 8 or so, and 15 mm, you can easily obtain shutter speeds faster than 1/15 (following the 1/FL for the shutter speed). So why a tripod? Is it also advisable to use a remote trigger?
Thank you for looking!!

Post #1, Jun 05, 2009 11:44:29


Juan

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mangaloreaviators
Senior Member
mangaloreaviators's Avatar
Joined Nov 2007
387 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

How sharp are the pictures taken at 1/15 ?

Try doing Night Photography handheld and the pictures will tell you that they could have been better if there was a stable tripod.

Check this link where people have a invested good $$$ on Tripod.
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=681408

I myself getting a Carbon Fible Tripod and Markins Q3T Bahhhead before investing in any L Glass.

Post #2, Jun 05, 2009 16:24:58




LOG IN TO REPLY
adam8080
Goldmember
adam8080's Avatar
Joined Jul 2007
2,280 posts
Huntsville, Alabama
[MORE/SHARE]

Do you want sharp pictures, or the sharpest?

Post #3, Jun 05, 2009 16:27:48


Housley Photographyexternal link
Camera Obscura
Business Card Help!

LOG IN TO REPLY
blackcap
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2007
415 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

juanpafer wrote in post #8055515external link
What am I missing here?
Everyone talks about a good tripod as a must for several types of photography. I got one a few months ago and have been very happy with the results in macro, night photography, etc.
Everyone recomends a tripod for landscapes also, and here is where I get confused. If you have decent light, f 8 or so, and 15 mm, you can easily obtain shutter speeds faster than 1/15 (following the 1/FL for the shutter speed). So why a tripod? Is it also advisable to use a remote trigger?
Thank you for looking!!

I generally use a tripod whenever I can, as it lets me set up and compose my shot while waiting for the right light. I also bracket my exposures so a tripod definitely eliminates problems with alignment if you need to blend shots. Sometimes though, you don't have time for a tripod, but as long as you get a fast enough shutter speed then that's fine.

Post #4, Jun 05, 2009 21:20:27


_______________
www.chrisgin.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
Joined Apr 2006
8,423 posts
North Carolina
[MORE/SHARE]

Welcome to POTN, Juan.

I once read an article that heldheld shots at 1/500 can still show camera movement. Very little, yes... but it can be there.

So the question is do you want to squeeze the last one or two or three percent of quality out of your shot or do you not?

Yes, use a remote trigger and use mirror lockup when appropriate.

Optimize everything you do to produce the best you can produce.

Post #5, Jun 06, 2009 07:11:29 as a reply to blackcap's post 9 hours earlier.


---------------
Fine Art Photographyexternal link | Painted Photosexternal link | Websiteexternal link | Blogexternal link | Twitterexternal link | Pinterestexternal link
---------------

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
juanpafer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
juanpafer's Avatar
Joined May 2009
1,733 posts
Louisville, KY
[MORE/SHARE]

I think it all boils to "sharp vs. sharper". I had been using my tripod almost exclusively for when I needed speeds slower than 1/fl (for landscapes I mean... I use it a lot for night photography, HDR, macro, long telephoto shooting...), but I think I will use it more.
Thank you all for your responses.

Post #6, Jun 08, 2009 09:33:21


Juan

LOG IN TO REPLY
rdricks
Senior Member
rdricks's Avatar
Joined Aug 2006
516 posts
Silicon Valley
[MORE/SHARE]

The tripod also helps in setup. I find when take the time to setup the tripod, I also take the time to really frame the photo. I'll play with various compositions and settings. It makes me think more. When I'm not using the tripod I tend to shoot and move on.

Post #7, Jun 08, 2009 12:07:12


-Ryan
Perspicacious Wordsexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
WaltA
Goldmember
WaltA's Avatar
Joined Feb 2006
3,389 posts
White Rock, BC, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

I agree with Ryan - when I'm on a road trip and pull of at a spot I want to investigate, if I don't set up the tripod and take my time I just shoot and run.

As well, I can experiment with some bracketing quite easily once all is in place.

Post #8, Jun 08, 2009 12:54:32


Canon 5D, 7D, 400D | Canon EF-S 17-85, 70-300 IS, 28-105/3.5 |

LOG IN TO REPLY
Rankinia
Senior Member
Joined Mar 2008
449 posts
Sydney, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

Tripods, mirror lock up and remote release are extremely important if you want the highest quality.

And in regards to your post I read a study that suggested for normal focal length lenses 1/13th was the speed effected by shutter slap the most.

It depends, if carrying a tripod and setting up for a shot ruins your style then they arent worth it. For me, Im a very technical shooter. Im happy waiting for light. Like high quality, use things like hyperfocal length etc. My brother hates them and uses them only for stacking of photos (again something Im not interested in unless I cannot get an exposure otherwise, which is rare enough that I forget how to merge photos).

Adam

Post #9, Jun 12, 2009 07:31:51


1ds, 30d, 17-40/4 180/3.5, mt-24, 580ex2
http://adamrose.wordpr​ess.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
WillOPhotos
Senior Member
WillOPhotos's Avatar
Joined Nov 2006
456 posts
Perth, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

I feel like im cheating if i dont use a tripod :lol: I want to make sure all my shots are as sharp as possible so I use a tripod all the time, most my shots are taken at shutterspeeds to slow for handheld too.

Post #10, Jun 13, 2009 00:32:53 as a reply to Rankinia's post 17 hours earlier.


Hassy H4D-40, Gitzo 3541XLS, RRS BH-55
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/willophotograph​y/external linkwww.williamophuis.com/​blog << add blog for some reason it goes to my main site :)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonydee
Goldmember
tonydee's Avatar
Joined Sep 2007
2,009 posts
Tokyo
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm in between. I agree using a tripod slows you down and that can make you consider the composition more thoroughly, as well as make your photography more disciplined in general. It's not just camera shake involved: for example, having the camera steady so you can systematically expose to the right may have a more dramatic impact on your eventual photo quality. But, other times moving around with the camera snapping things off from different angles is a more productive use of time, and I feel I'm learning more from having more shots to compare later, and more chance to experiment.

So, perhaps some combination of the two practices is best for improving your photography in general.

Quality wise, if you really think this shot is going to be your all time favourite, then by all means do everything to get it as sharp as you can. But if, realistically, you know it's just the best of what's around, and maybe won't even be the best for the day, that doesn't mean it's not worth taking but it might not be worth spending extra time on.

I'm generally happy with the images I get from my 5D sans tripod. Many of my lenses have IS too, so it's often practical. I do generally consider it a better use of my time, a better self-education even, to take more shots and not chase that last 1, 2 or 3 percent of quality. I could put that time in at work and move from 5D to 5DmkII and there'd be no question the quality would be more than 3% better. Or, I can use the 645E (always with tripod) and best a mkII. Not worth getting hung up on it. In 20 years time we'll have 200MP cameras and the IQ of these shots won't seem so brilliant anyway, but I want to be a better photographer then.

Cheers, Tony

Post #11, Jun 15, 2009 04:21:21


5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
http://www.picasaweb.c​om/anthonyponexternal link recent work

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2008
5,328 posts
Melbourne, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

Tripods are invaluable - not so much for sharpness, but for opening up opportunities for shooting that wouldn't otherwise exist:

  • Night-time shots
  • HDR (invaluable for high-contrast scenes with deep shadows and bright sunlight)
  • Long-exposure blurring of water
  • Panoramas (especially those with nearby elements)
  • Telephoto landscape shots


Not all landscape shots are taken with wide lenses in reasonable lighting!

Post #12, Jun 15, 2009 04:57:45




LOG IN TO REPLY
ianlti
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2009
229 posts
Buffalo NY
[MORE/SHARE]

70-200mm is good for landscape?

Post #13, Jun 16, 2009 21:35:30


Ian
Gear List
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2008
5,328 posts
Melbourne, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

ianlti wrote in post #8123148external link
70-200mm is good for landscape?

Yes. So is 100-400.

Ever tried taking a detailed shot of an ice face with overhanging cornices with an UWA?

Post #14, Jun 17, 2009 08:03:15




LOG IN TO REPLY
rdricks
Senior Member
rdricks's Avatar
Joined Aug 2006
516 posts
Silicon Valley
[MORE/SHARE]

My wife asked what my photography "style" was the other day. I replied telephoto landscapes. If I had to pick one lens for landscape it would be the 70-200. A large number of my shots are with the 100-400. The wide end of my range is 24, and I do not use it very often.

A lot of people get great shots with wide angle. A few get great shots with UWA. Some of us work with telephotos. Experiment. The beauty of digital is you do not have to worry about shooting extra shots. (8-10 rolls of film a day used to really add up;))

Post #15, Jun 17, 2009 08:20:02 as a reply to Shadowblade's post 16 minutes earlier.


-Ryan
Perspicacious Wordsexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
2,276 views & 0 likes for this thread
Tripod for landscapes?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Nature & Landscapes Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00212 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1076 guests, 859 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Sprint9169

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.