Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre People Talk
Thread started 20 Jun 2009 (Saturday) 18:04
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Shooting people at night with a single Speedlite

 
podoco
Member
116 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Jun 20, 2009 18:04 |  #1

Hi,

Question for those who have figured this one out.

How do you take a picture of a single subject and/or group subjects outdoors at night with hardly any ambient light when armed with a single 580EXII? (ie: no walls/ceilings to bounce, no diffusers or other props - just the camera and flash).

Are you simply doomed to get snapshot pictures or is it at all possible to get decent pictures?

Thx




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
breathless
Senior Member
breathless's Avatar
388 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Jun 20, 2009 21:31 |  #2

podoco wrote in post #8145476external link
Hi,

Question for those who have figured this one out.

How do you take a picture of a single subject and/or group subjects outdoors at night with hardly any ambient light when armed with a single 580EXII? (ie: no walls/ceilings to bounce, no diffusers or other props - just the camera and flash).

Are you simply doomed to get snapshot pictures or is it at all possible to get decent pictures?

Thx

Define "decent?"
You have one small source of light. It can(on camera and without modifying) provide one quality of light, which is specular and direct. If you wish to, and have the means to modify, move, adjust the light, that one flash can provide many different qualities and directions of light.


Chris
Photographer, lover.
websiteexternal link | facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Christopher Steven b's Avatar
3,546 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Ottawa, Canada
Jun 26, 2009 03:28 |  #3

At the after party of a very intimate wedding I shot last month, there was the opportunity for a shot outdoors in near pitch dark. there obviously was no ceiling to bounce off of, but there was the front of the house. Had there not been a front to the house (what?), I might have asked for someone in a white top to stand next to me for a moment. Bounce off of whatever you can. where there are no walls or ceilings, make them.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.comexternal link| Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Christopher Steven b's Avatar
3,546 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Ottawa, Canada
Jun 26, 2009 03:31 |  #4

Ah. but when there's NOTHING to bounce from?
haha--what about camera upside down and bouncing from the ground?
I really must take this to the patent office.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.comexternal link| Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Joined Nov 2008
California
Jun 26, 2009 03:58 |  #5

As stated above, make a reflector, or drag the shutter.




LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Philly 'burbs
Jun 26, 2009 06:48 as a reply to toxic's post |  #6

Well if they're just standing in a field, you don't have to worry about nasty shadows from direct flash :)

Use direct flash to light up the subject(s), drag the shutter so it doesn't look like they're standing in a cave.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Christopher Steven b's Avatar
3,546 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Ottawa, Canada
Jun 26, 2009 12:06 |  #7

Here's another possibility: via wireless or sync cable use the flash off camera. Even through the light source is just as small, the directionality of it gives it a much more pleasing quality than direct on camera flash in my opinion.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.comexternal link| Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CosmoKid
Goldmember
CosmoKid's Avatar
4,235 posts
Joined May 2009
NJ
Jun 29, 2009 14:20 |  #8

why is it so hard to carry a diffuser? they are 2" by 3" and cost $15.


Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
iRocktheShot.comexternal link - Portfolioexternal link

Gear/Feedback
Facebook "Fan" Pageexternal link -

LOG IN TO REPLY
breathless
Senior Member
breathless's Avatar
388 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Jun 29, 2009 14:52 |  #9

CosmoKid wrote in post #8195453external link
why is it so hard to carry a diffuser? they are 2" by 3" and cost $15.

It'll be $15 wasted, unfortunately. Outdoors at night with nothing to bounce that light on, what's the use?


Chris
Photographer, lover.
websiteexternal link | facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CosmoKid
Goldmember
CosmoKid's Avatar
4,235 posts
Joined May 2009
NJ
Jun 30, 2009 12:54 |  #10

breathless wrote in post #8195626external link
It'll be $15 wasted, unfortunately. Outdoors at night with nothing to bounce that light on, what's the use?

then i am confused.

if you use a sto-fen on the flash, why are you bouncing?


Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
iRocktheShot.comexternal link - Portfolioexternal link

Gear/Feedback
Facebook "Fan" Pageexternal link -

LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Joined Nov 2008
California
Jun 30, 2009 13:20 |  #11

The whole point of a diffuser is to disperse the light so it bounces off various surfaces. If there's nothing to bounce off of, all you do is make the flash work harder for the same exposure.




LOG IN TO REPLY
breathless
Senior Member
breathless's Avatar
388 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Jun 30, 2009 14:33 as a reply to toxic's post |  #12

Cosmokid, The "softness" of light is directly related to the size and distance of the source to the subject. The larger the light source and the closer the light source to the subject, the softer the light source. Light does not become soft by "filtering" it through some transparent material. The theory behind the diffusers, such as the Sto-fen, is to spread light around a room, or a wall, illuminating it, hence making the illuminated room or wall the new, larger(therefore softer) light source.

In a dark space, without anything to reflect the light off of, the size of the light source has has not changed with the use of a small diffuser, and will not provide light quality which is much different than a bare flash exposure.


Chris
Photographer, lover.
websiteexternal link | facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Rodreguez
Senior Member
269 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Bournemouth
Jun 30, 2009 18:22 |  #13

toxic wrote in post #8201379external link
The whole point of a diffuser is to disperse the light so it bounces off various surfaces. If there's nothing to bounce off of, all you do is make the flash work harder for the same exposure.

But putting a Stofen or a Lumiquest softbox on your flash immediately softens and diffuses the light regardless of what you may or may not have to bounce off.


View mein website:

www.rodlewisphotograph​y.co.ukexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
breathless
Senior Member
breathless's Avatar
388 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Jun 30, 2009 21:11 as a reply to Rodreguez's post |  #14

Uh boy...


Chris
Photographer, lover.
websiteexternal link | facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sjlund
Senior Member
568 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Northern Minnesota
Jun 30, 2009 21:19 |  #15

Rodreguez wrote in post #8202795external link
But putting a Stofen or a Lumiquest softbox on your flash immediately softens and diffuses the light regardless of what you may or may not have to bounce off.

With nothing to bounce from, a Stofen is worse than useless. It's called the omnibounce for a reason. Using a Stofen in a field just creates a weaker light source.


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

8,704 views & 0 likes for this thread
Shooting people at night with a single Speedlite
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre People Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00115 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is raspino
949 guests, 658 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015