Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 05 Aug 2009 (Wednesday) 06:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

DPP: Soft JPEG when 'convert & save' from RAW

 
grander
Member
44 posts
Joined Jun 2009
     
Aug 05, 2009 06:16 |  #1

So I've just spent the better part of 5 hours on here reading past threads about this problem as I too had this happening... The processed JPEG that I opened in Windows Picture & Fax Viewer looked really soft compared to the modified RAW that was still open in DPP 3.5.

I followed what a member on here (Rene Damkot) was saying... compare them at 100% and decide. Rene was right, the images were about the same... a bit better result.

But to tell you the truth I dont really want to spend all this cash and time on photography so that when I show my mates or fiancee what I've been up to, the images look really soft at first glance.

I opened up the JPEG with Windows Viewer, the RAW with DPP and another copy of the JPEG with Quicktime Picture Viewer 7.6.

The Windows viewer was soft
DPP was sharp
Quicktime viewer was sharp

Any ideas why this would happen ?? Why would the programs differ ??
Is there another viewer I should be associating JPEGS with ?? or stay with Quicktime...

Sam


Canon 50D -- Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 -- Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 -- Canon 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
LowerO
Member
46 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
     
Aug 05, 2009 07:42 |  #2

Sam

I had similar frustrations when comparing DPP with LR2. DPP was much better to my eye. Rene and Victoria provided some very useful insight into why it was the case. As a result I changed some of the settings in LR2 and now the 2 programs deliver very similar onscreen results.

It sounds like you've got a similar situation.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=732376

Regards

Nigel


50D 50 1.8 24-105 4L 70-200 4L 70-200 2.8L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Aug 05, 2009 09:09 |  #3

Yep. To be expected.

Don't use MS Picture & Fax viewer. Seriously. It sucks. And it doesn't color manage properly.
Thread

If all you want to do is show the images on screen, I'd batch them out of DPP to screen size (in pixels) or a bit smaller, so that the resulting jpg is viewed at 100% in whatever viewer. That way, you can set the sharpness to what you want it to be, and the "viewing" software doesn't need to resize,so cannot screw up there.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_bass5
Goldmember
4,262 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 173
Joined Apr 2005
Location: London, centre of the universe
     
Aug 05, 2009 09:25 |  #4

grander wrote in post #8402229 (external link)
But to tell you the truth I dont really want to spend all this cash and time on photography so that when I show my mates or fiancee what I've been up to, the images look really soft at first glance.



Sam

Why don't you just output the jpegs at a decent enough size to almost fill the screen. Thats what i do. That way you can view them at 100% automatically and they will look sharp no matter what you view them with.

EDIT: Ooops, i took so long to type this i didnt see its already been suggested. Sorry Rene.


Dave.
Gallery@http://www.flickr.com/​photos/davebass5/ (external link)
Canon 5DMKIV | Canon 80D | Canon 650D | Canon 24-70 f/2.8L MKII | 70-300L | 135L f/2.0 | EF-S 10-18 | 40 f/2.8 STM | 35mm f/2 IS | Canon S110 | Fuji F31FD | Canon 580EXII, 270EXII | Yongnuo YN-622C Triggers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grander
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
44 posts
Joined Jun 2009
     
Aug 06, 2009 00:40 as a reply to  @ dave_bass5's post |  #5

Thanks for the info Nigel. I'll do some reading up on that for sure.

And cheers Rene and dave... sounds like a good idea... I'll more than likely associate all jpegs with quicktime from now on as well.


Canon 50D -- Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 -- Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 -- Canon 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Aug 06, 2009 00:48 |  #6

Windows viewer doesn't have a proper resizing method, so everything ends up soft. Use a web browser like firefox instead, if you need to preview something.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,244 views & 0 likes for this thread
DPP: Soft JPEG when 'convert & save' from RAW
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mason.snipes
692 guests, 379 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.