LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Natural Light vs. Studio Lighting for newborns?

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Kids & Family Talk
Thread started 08 Aug 2009 (Saturday) 01:12   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
dolphinz8
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2009
100 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I am trying to figure out what to do for newborn sessions. Is it best to use natural light, vs. studio lighting? Is it better to have them come to my studio, or do an on location session at their home, or wherever they choose? In the past newborn sessions that I have done, studio lighting seemed too harsh and hard to work with with newborns. They can bend in so many different directions that there always seemed to be a shadow in places where I didn't want one.

Thanks for any advice that you can give!!!!

Post #1, Aug 08, 2009 01:12:26


Kansas City Photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
Joined Nov 2007
16,610 posts
Bay Area, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Why limit yourself. I would say try both ways. Wondeful pictures can be done either way. For some reason natural light folks look down on studio light folks. Light is a light, as long as you know how to control it.

And I don't under stand:

"studio lighting seemed too harsh and hard to work with with newborns. They can bend in so many different directions that there always seemed to be a shadow in places where I didn't want one."

My very limited experience with newborn is that they just stay put where you put them. With studio lights you can move lights around where you want them. With window light, I will have to move the baby to optimum position.

Post #2, Aug 10, 2009 09:06:40


5dmk3, Sigma Art 35mm f1.4, 35L, 85L II, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2

LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
cdifoto's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
34,036 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

eranaubs wrote in post #8421219external link
I am trying to figure out what to do for newborn sessions. Is it best to use natural light, vs. studio lighting? Is it better to have them come to my studio, or do an on location session at their home, or wherever they choose? In the past newborn sessions that I have done, studio lighting seemed too harsh and hard to work with with newborns. They can bend in so many different directions that there always seemed to be a shadow in places where I didn't want one.

Thanks for any advice that you can give!!!!

It was harsh because you didn't know how to control and/or modify it.

The cheap way is to find a big window. The easy way is to get a big soft box. Of course a big soft box for an infant isn't all that huge. A 24" square one would be plenty.

Post #3, Aug 10, 2009 09:19:50


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it hereexternal link. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!

LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Cream of the Crop
RDKirk's Avatar
Joined May 2004
11,579 posts
USA
[MORE/SHARE]

If you're talking about continuous studio lighting, that can be problematical with any living subject, not to mention newborns. Continuous light will either be very hot and bright or very low-level and require longish exposures.

Electronic flash is not a problem, although some people unncessarily worry that the bright flash might harm the infant's eyes. The thing to remember is that the effect of radiation (including visible light radiation) is cumulative, and that the electronic flash a baby might experience during the session has nowhere near the same effect as the five minutes of sunlight the baby endures between the car and the studio.

Post #4, Aug 10, 2009 10:05:00 as a reply to cdifoto's post 45 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
zasey
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2009
129 posts
Houston
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm a natural light photographer...I think it's most flattering....but I've also worked with studio lighting and you can get some amazing photographs with both. I would suggest doing the session at the home of the client so that both the baby and mother can be the most comfortable resulting in better pictures for you! yay!!!

Post #5, Aug 17, 2009 22:22:59


Amber
www.zaseyphotography.c​omexternal link
Canon! Need I say more?? :D

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
littleme
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2007
102 posts
Oregon
[MORE/SHARE]

I go to my clients' homes and would prefer the simplicity of natural light, but I generally break down and set up my light unless there is wonderful natural light coming into the home. Both yield wonderful results when done correctly.

Strobe...

IMAGE: http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k294/karelle11/IMG_8048.jpg

IMAGE: http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k294/karelle11/IMG_2853.jpg

IMAGE: http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k294/karelle11/IMG_2831copy.jpg

IMAGE: http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k294/karelle11/IMG_2871.jpg

Natural light...
IMAGE: http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k294/karelle11/IMG_3522.jpg

IMAGE: http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k294/karelle11/IMG_3447.jpg

IMAGE: http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k294/karelle11/IMG_3468.jpg

IMAGE: http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k294/karelle11/IMG_3478.jpg

Post #6, Aug 20, 2009 15:11:39


Karen
Little You Photographyexternal link
Canon 5D, Canon 50D, 85 f1.8, 70-200 f4, 50 f1.8, Tamron 28-75 f2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
beegeeboy
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2008
299 posts
In the middle of the UK...
[MORE/SHARE]

Littleme, those are some seriously fantastic shots...hats off to ya.

David

Post #7, Aug 20, 2009 18:18:00


Gear: A box with a hole; some tubes with glass in 'em
SmugMugexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
littleme
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2007
102 posts
Oregon
[MORE/SHARE]

Thank you, David!

Post #8, Aug 20, 2009 18:21:36


Karen
Little You Photographyexternal link
Canon 5D, Canon 50D, 85 f1.8, 70-200 f4, 50 f1.8, Tamron 28-75 f2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
dolphinz8
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2009
100 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

littleme..those pics are awesome!! great job!! I guess I just need to play around with the light a little more. I had a client that came to my studio but it just wasn't working, the baby was having a rough time. After 3 hrs they went home, and then I ended up going to her home a few days later and it went much better. Thank you so much for your input everyone!! I really appreciate it!

Post #9, Aug 21, 2009 01:29:36


Kansas City Photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
8,285 views & 0 likes for this thread
Natural Light vs. Studio Lighting for newborns?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Kids & Family Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00105 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1112 guests, 804 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is jdunker

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.