Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Kids & Family Talk 
Thread started 08 Aug 2009 (Saturday) 01:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Natural Light vs. Studio Lighting for newborns?

 
dolphinz8
Member
100 posts
Joined Jun 2009
     
Aug 08, 2009 01:12 |  #1

I am trying to figure out what to do for newborn sessions. Is it best to use natural light, vs. studio lighting? Is it better to have them come to my studio, or do an on location session at their home, or wherever they choose? In the past newborn sessions that I have done, studio lighting seemed too harsh and hard to work with with newborns. They can bend in so many different directions that there always seemed to be a shadow in places where I didn't want one.

Thanks for any advice that you can give!!!!


Kansas City Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
18,731 posts
Likes: 889
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Aug 10, 2009 09:06 |  #2

Why limit yourself. I would say try both ways. Wondeful pictures can be done either way. For some reason natural light folks look down on studio light folks. Light is a light, as long as you know how to control it.

And I don't under stand:

"studio lighting seemed too harsh and hard to work with with newborns. They can bend in so many different directions that there always seemed to be a shadow in places where I didn't want one."

My very limited experience with newborn is that they just stay put where you put them. With studio lights you can move lights around where you want them. With window light, I will have to move the baby to optimum position.


5dmk3, 35L, 85L II, 300mm f2.8 IS I, 400mm f5.6
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2, 90mm f2, 50-140mm f2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,039 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Dec 2005
     
Aug 10, 2009 09:19 |  #3

eranaubs wrote in post #8421219 (external link)
I am trying to figure out what to do for newborn sessions. Is it best to use natural light, vs. studio lighting? Is it better to have them come to my studio, or do an on location session at their home, or wherever they choose? In the past newborn sessions that I have done, studio lighting seemed too harsh and hard to work with with newborns. They can bend in so many different directions that there always seemed to be a shadow in places where I didn't want one.

Thanks for any advice that you can give!!!!

It was harsh because you didn't know how to control and/or modify it.

The cheap way is to find a big window. The easy way is to get a big soft box. Of course a big soft box for an infant isn't all that huge. A 24" square one would be plenty.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
12,687 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 371
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Aug 10, 2009 10:05 as a reply to  @ cdifoto's post |  #4

If you're talking about continuous studio lighting, that can be problematical with any living subject, not to mention newborns. Continuous light will either be very hot and bright or very low-level and require longish exposures.

Electronic flash is not a problem, although some people unncessarily worry that the bright flash might harm the infant's eyes. The thing to remember is that the effect of radiation (including visible light radiation) is cumulative, and that the electronic flash a baby might experience during the session has nowhere near the same effect as the five minutes of sunlight the baby endures between the car and the studio.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zasey
Member
129 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Houston
     
Aug 17, 2009 22:22 |  #5

I'm a natural light photographer...I think it's most flattering....but I've also worked with studio lighting and you can get some amazing photographs with both. I would suggest doing the session at the home of the client so that both the baby and mother can be the most comfortable resulting in better pictures for you! yay!!!


Amber
www.zaseyphotography.c​om (external link)
Canon! Need I say more?? :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
littleme
Member
102 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
     
Aug 20, 2009 15:11 |  #6

I go to my clients' homes and would prefer the simplicity of natural light, but I generally break down and set up my light unless there is wonderful natural light coming into the home. Both yield wonderful results when done correctly.

Strobe...

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i91.photobucket​.com …94/karelle11/IM​G_8048.jpg (external link)


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i91.photobucket​.com …94/karelle11/IM​G_2853.jpg (external link)


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i91.photobucket​.com …arelle11/IMG_28​31copy.jpg (external link)


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i91.photobucket​.com …94/karelle11/IM​G_2871.jpg (external link)


Natural light...
PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i91.photobucket​.com …94/karelle11/IM​G_3522.jpg (external link)


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i91.photobucket​.com …94/karelle11/IM​G_3447.jpg (external link)


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i91.photobucket​.com …94/karelle11/IM​G_3468.jpg (external link)


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i91.photobucket​.com …94/karelle11/IM​G_3478.jpg (external link)

Karen
Little You Photography (external link)
Canon 5D, Canon 50D, 85 f1.8, 70-200 f4, 50 f1.8, Tamron 28-75 f2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beegeeboy
Senior Member
304 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2008
Location: In the middle of the UK...
     
Aug 20, 2009 18:18 |  #7

Littleme, those are some seriously fantastic shots...hats off to ya.

David


Gear: A box with a hole; some tubes with glass in 'em
SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
littleme
Member
102 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
     
Aug 20, 2009 18:21 |  #8

Thank you, David!


Karen
Little You Photography (external link)
Canon 5D, Canon 50D, 85 f1.8, 70-200 f4, 50 f1.8, Tamron 28-75 f2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dolphinz8
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
100 posts
Joined Jun 2009
     
Aug 21, 2009 01:29 |  #9

littleme..those pics are awesome!! great job!! I guess I just need to play around with the light a little more. I had a client that came to my studio but it just wasn't working, the baby was having a rough time. After 3 hrs they went home, and then I ended up going to her home a few days later and it went much better. Thank you so much for your input everyone!! I really appreciate it!


Kansas City Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

10,437 views & 0 likes for this thread
Natural Light vs. Studio Lighting for newborns?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Kids & Family Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is insurfr
785 guests, 427 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.