![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
Just saw this on DPReview. It's definitely interesting (though we'll have to see how it actually turns out on a still camera), but it made me think of a conversation I once had with a coworker who's spent most of his life as a pro photographer.
He told me that somewhere in the late seventies he'd been approached by a friend looking for people to test out a new device he'd been working on. Apparently this guy had found that the particular film he liked to use required some concrete number of photons to activate it before it could even start recording an image. Figuring that this meant that a decent amount of the light coming through a lens was wasted on "energizing" the film, he devised this little in-body insert that basically consisted of two LEDs that gave off exactly the number of photons it would take to get the film going. My coworker claims that the results he got in his brief bit of testing amounted to something like ISO 51200 film with very little grain. He says the guy offered to sell him the device but he didn't have the money to buy it. Later, he found out that the guy was creating the thing for the military, and that the project had been scrapped once night vision rolled around. Clearly this could be complete BS, but hey, who doesn't love a nifty little story like that?
__________________
Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent My weak lil' 500px |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
That is interesting, I'll give ya that.
__________________
Just a guy with a few photography goodies that challenge me anew every day! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gainesville, Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,473
|
I could certainly use that on my Elan 7
__________________
flickr Canon: 40D, 16-35L, 50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, 100mm f/2.0, 75-300mm IS, 35-350L Sigma: 70-200mm f/2.8; Alien Bees: B1600 Tamron: 17-50mm, 28-75mm, 90mm fMacro, |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
we over look the simplest things
|
What no link to the schematic or youtube video showing it in use.
__________________
5D | (2) 550EX | 17-40L | Tammy 28-75 2.8 | 28-135 | 50/1.8 | 85/1.8 | 70-200L 2.8 IS Sigma 18-125 | (4)AB B400 | Load of Pentax M42's |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Wait, all that time and all I get is "Cream of the Damn Crop" ?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
It looks like a classic "well Duh" tech moment,..
ie: I had no idea we've been using CMOS sensors that were clearly made "upside down" in the first place. Nice to see Sony taking the huge leap in logic to "turn it right side up" Makes perfect sense! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,662
|
Quote:
It will be interesting to see the results in the compact form, and to see what happens with the D-SLRs. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My sensor cleaning horror story | tpatana | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 74 | 21st of October 2008 (Tue) 23:19 |
| Canon 5D 12MP sensor vs New Sony 12MP CMOS sensor | Tee Why | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 37 | 7th of September 2007 (Fri) 17:14 |
| Yet another sensor cleaning story | offtheroad | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 4 | 28th of April 2007 (Sat) 22:47 |
| Have I hurt my sensor? (picture and story) | Ursula | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 12 | 17th of March 2006 (Fri) 09:53 |
| New Magazine includes story on sensor cleaning | jimsolt | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 2 | 27th of April 2005 (Wed) 18:15 |