Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 19 May 2005 (Thursday) 10:21
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Why are there no 200-400mm or 200-500mm lenses?

 
EricKonieczny
Senior Member
EricKonieczny's Avatar
675 posts

Joined Jan 2005

Outside Your window, with a Camera
MORE INFO

I would think that this would be a great zoom range for many activities?

Is it the price? I know if Canon made a f4L version of one of these the price would be big. What type of speed would be best for a lense like this. Or does canon just prefer to let people use the 1.4 or 2X Extenders?

I know the Canon 70-200 versions are very popular, but when you want something longer you either have overlapping with the 100-400 or have to go with a prime.

After seeing threads about the 50-500 Bigma, it got me thinking.

May 19, 2005 10:21

EKREATING photography - capture the feeling!external link
20D w/Grip|28-105 f3.5-4.5|70-200 f2.8L IS|10-22|580EX w/ ST-E2|Tripod 3021BPRO w/ 488RC2 Midi Ballhead & TC-80N3 Remote|Archos GMini 400|Tamrac Expedition 5



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Jon
Moderator

Cocker Spaniel Mod

Jon's Avatar
68,810 posts

Joined Jun 2004

Bethesda, MD USA
MORE INFO

OK - 200-400 is less that the oh-so-popular 100-400 L. And the 100-400 has an absolutely great range. Having used it, I can't see getting something that did less. Going out to 500 on a zoom would be nice, though I think the 100-400 and 70-200 f/2.8 IS are about at the reasonable limits for most people.

May 19, 2005 10:45

Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

LOG IN TO REPLY
mdr
Goldmember
mdr's Avatar
1,167 posts

Joined Jan 2005

Glasgow, Scotland
MORE INFO

There are: Tamron made a 200-400mm lens and has just replaced it by a 200-500mm lens.

May 19, 2005 11:43

Marc
Glasgow, Scotland
www.marcderidder.comexternal link
www.deridder.meexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
LadyHawk
Senior Member
LadyHawk's Avatar
611 posts

Joined Mar 2005

Connecticut
MORE INFO

I would be interested in a 200-500mm lens. Are Tamron lenses any good?

May 19, 2005 11:52

Karen
_______________www.ctw​ebworx.com

LOG IN TO REPLY
lost
Goldmember
lost's Avatar
1,009 posts

Joined Jan 2005

Houma, LA
MORE INFO

If anyone has one of the 200-500 can they post some pictures at the wide and long end. Wide open and stopped down if thats not too much to ask.

Thanks

May 19, 2005 12:09

Canon 7D
Canon EF 100-400L - Sigma EF 24-70 2.8 EX DG Macro Canon EF 50mm 1.8 - 580 EX

"Its all fun and games till the rent check bounces." Lost

LOG IN TO REPLY
musthavemuzk
Senior Member
364 posts
Joined Feb 2005

Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA
MORE INFO

not to bag on the tamron 200-500 but it takes like a day and a half to go from 2-5 when zooming. at least that is what i noticed when i got to play with one in store.
it felt pretty good in my hands. it was light. but it was alot of turning to zoom.
did not snap any shots, just played with it so i cannot comment on anything else.
the 500 was nice that is for sure.

Monty

May 19, 2005 16:39 as a reply to lost's post 4 hours earlier.

20D + some stuff..including a computer that is capable of editing (been without one for months now)
prepare to do some learning and have some fun.
www.pbase.com/musthave​muzkexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Tom W's Avatar
12,743 posts

Joined Feb 2003

Chattanooga, Tennessee
MORE INFO

I'd like to see a 200-400 f/4 zoom, but I wouldn't really want to see a 200-400 any slower than that. Might as well have the whole 100-400 range in that case.

May 19, 2005 17:15

Tom
5D III, 70D, & various lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
RbrtPtikLeoSeny
Goldmember
2,480 posts
Joined Apr 2005

Turners Falls Massachusetts
MORE INFO

Nice focal lengths, but ugly lenses! I wouldn't even consider buying one of these they're so dumb looking. I personally like my lenses to be attractive and get great pics. :-)

May 21, 2005 16:02

My Websiteexternal link

-Patrick
http://photography-on-the.net ...p?p=1495794&postcou​nt=100

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,932 views & 0 likes for this thread
Why are there no 200-400mm or 200-500mm lenses?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00113 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is RobinHartel
577 guests, 511 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015