Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 19 May 2005 (Thursday) 10:21
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Why are there no 200-400mm or 200-500mm lenses?

 
EricKonieczny
Senior Member
EricKonieczny's Avatar
675 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Outside Your window, with a Camera
May 19, 2005 10:21 |  #1

I would think that this would be a great zoom range for many activities?

Is it the price? I know if Canon made a f4L version of one of these the price would be big. What type of speed would be best for a lense like this. Or does canon just prefer to let people use the 1.4 or 2X Extenders?

I know the Canon 70-200 versions are very popular, but when you want something longer you either have overlapping with the 100-400 or have to go with a prime.

After seeing threads about the 50-500 Bigma, it got me thinking.


EKREATING photography - capture the feeling!external link
20D w/Grip|28-105 f3.5-4.5|70-200 f2.8L IS|10-22|580EX w/ ST-E2|Tripod 3021BPRO w/ 488RC2 Midi Ballhead & TC-80N3 Remote|Archos GMini 400|Tamrac Expedition 5



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Jon's Avatar
69,628 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Bethesda, MD USA
May 19, 2005 10:45 |  #2

OK - 200-400 is less that the oh-so-popular 100-400 L. And the 100-400 has an absolutely great range. Having used it, I can't see getting something that did less. Going out to 500 on a zoom would be nice, though I think the 100-400 and 70-200 f/2.8 IS are about at the reasonable limits for most people.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

LOG IN TO REPLY
mdr
Goldmember
mdr's Avatar
1,167 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Glasgow, Scotland
May 19, 2005 11:43 |  #3

There are: Tamron made a 200-400mm lens and has just replaced it by a 200-500mm lens.


Marc
Glasgow, Scotland
www.marcderidder.comexternal link
www.deridder.meexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
LadyHawk
Senior Member
LadyHawk's Avatar
611 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Connecticut
May 19, 2005 11:52 |  #4

I would be interested in a 200-500mm lens. Are Tamron lenses any good?


Karen
_______________www.ctw​ebworx.com

LOG IN TO REPLY
lost
Goldmember
lost's Avatar
1,009 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Houma, LA
May 19, 2005 12:09 |  #5

If anyone has one of the 200-500 can they post some pictures at the wide and long end. Wide open and stopped down if thats not too much to ask.

Thanks


Canon 7D
Canon EF 100-400L - Sigma EF 24-70 2.8 EX DG Macro Canon EF 50mm 1.8 - 580 EX

"Its all fun and games till the rent check bounces." Lost

LOG IN TO REPLY
musthavemuzk
Senior Member
364 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA
May 19, 2005 16:39 as a reply to lost's post |  #6

not to bag on the tamron 200-500 but it takes like a day and a half to go from 2-5 when zooming. at least that is what i noticed when i got to play with one in store.
it felt pretty good in my hands. it was light. but it was alot of turning to zoom.
did not snap any shots, just played with it so i cannot comment on anything else.
the 500 was nice that is for sure.

Monty


20D + some stuff..including a computer that is capable of editing (been without one for months now)
prepare to do some learning and have some fun.
www.pbase.com/musthave​muzkexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Tom W's Avatar
12,743 posts
Joined Feb 2003
Chattanooga, Tennessee
May 19, 2005 17:15 |  #7

I'd like to see a 200-400 f/4 zoom, but I wouldn't really want to see a 200-400 any slower than that. Might as well have the whole 100-400 range in that case.


Tom
5D III, 70D, & various lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
RbrtPtikLeoSeny
Goldmember
2,481 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Mont Vernon, NH
May 21, 2005 16:02 |  #8

Nice focal lengths, but ugly lenses! I wouldn't even consider buying one of these they're so dumb looking. I personally like my lenses to be attractive and get great pics. :-)


My Websiteexternal link

-Patrick
http://photography-on-the.net ...p?p=1495794&postcou​nt=100

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,110 views & 0 likes for this thread
Why are there no 200-400mm or 200-500mm lenses?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00085 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is scoobs00
688 guests, 393 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016