Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 04 Sep 2009 (Friday) 01:07
PREV/NEXT

Scott Kelby -The Truth About Lenses - Fixed- Length Prime Lenses Vs. Zooms

 
moemoe6434
Senior Member
448 posts
Joined Apr 2007
MORE INFO

airfrogusmc wrote in post #8991562external link
Love BELLS We couldn't get in the Chicago area for a very long time. Bells and their distributer were at odds. Three Floyds is a good brew also. I also like the KING of IPAs Dogfish Head 120 IPA. This is a serious IPA. Extremely hoppy.

http://www.dogfish.com ...rities/120-minute-ipa.htmexternal link

Bells Best brown Al has been my favorite beer for about a year now. It is back in season now too!

Nov 10, 2009 19:42

http://photography-on-the.net ...p?p=14246741#post14​246741

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jetcode
Cream of the Crop
6,226 posts
Joined Jul 2009

West Marin
MORE INFO

Thanks to this thread I know a lot more about Scott Kelby and I agree with ConDigital he knows a lot about photography, imaging, and image processing. He has a really nice portfolio and lots of books some of which I am working through currently. Way ahead of my game for sure.

Nov 10, 2009 20:35



LOG IN TO REPLY
alex66
Member
107 posts
Joined Feb 2006
MORE INFO

ConDigital wrote in post #8991607external link
Yes he knows his stuff.

I couldn't pick a shot that was taken with a zoom or a prime. I wonder just how many that handfull is that Scott mentions.

I find this quite interesting although Scott knows his post processing very well but above all he is extremely good at explaining things, thats why he is a success and his books sell. But it does not matter for this argument whether he is a great, good or dull photographer, the talk is of a technical parameter and not a compositional one. On the balance though he is some what correct and the important thing to get out of all this is what works for the one holding the camera whether that be a kit lens, the nifty fifty or L glass. What works for any of you may not be good for me and vice versa its the same as artists with brushes or carpenters with chisels. :D

Nov 10, 2009 20:50

Stuff
Feed Your Head

LOG IN TO REPLY
CAL ­ Imagery
Goldmember
CAL Imagery's Avatar
3,375 posts

Joined Apr 2008

O-H
MORE INFO

MDJAK wrote in post #8991514external link
In my drinking days, which weren't much to speak of, I preferred a good Becks dark.

I used to really like Becks, but now I'm with SPG, as it's slightly cheaper and slightly better, IMO; however, it's a toss up between SPG Special Dark and Guinness Extra Stout as my favorite. In any case, those beers are safe from my friends. :lol:

Nov 10, 2009 22:49

Christian

LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
"God bless the new meds"
mattograph's Avatar
7,693 posts

Joined Jan 2008

Louisville, KY
MORE INFO

Look, I know some of you light to tap a pint or two, but lets get back on topic.

I need some advice on a really good 78 cartridge.

Nov 10, 2009 22:58

This space for rent.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
WhyFi
Goldmember
WhyFi's Avatar
2,405 posts
GALLERY: 43 photos
Joined Apr 2008

I got a castle in Brooklyn, that's where I dwell.
MORE INFO

mattograph wrote in post #8994049external link
Look, I know some of you light to tap a pint or two, but lets get back on topic.

I need some advice on a really good 78 cartridge.

Never spun a 78, but mono... mono is where it's at! Wish I could afford a good two arm 'table to keep a mono cart at the ready all the time...

Nov 11, 2009 05:58

Do what works for you.
Bill is my name - I'm the most wanted man on my island, except I'm not on my island, of course. More's the pity.
Gear | Webexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
alex66
Member
107 posts
Joined Feb 2006
MORE INFO

mattograph wrote in post #8994049external link
Look, I know some of you light to tap a pint or two, but lets get back on topic.

I need some advice on a really good 78 cartridge.

On the subject of 78 playback you will need to find a dedicated photo stage preferably one with various playback curves as the recording curves were all over the shop. I designed and built one for a collector of 78's years ago as they found it hard to get one that worked properly.

Nov 11, 2009 10:42

Stuff
Feed Your Head

LOG IN TO REPLY
fotoworx
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I get 'em pregnant"
fotoworx's Avatar
4,547 posts

Joined Mar 2009
MORE INFO

alex66 wrote in post #8993425external link
I find this quite interesting although Scott knows his post processing very well but above all he is extremely good at explaining things, thats why he is a success and his books sell. But it does not matter for this argument whether he is a great, good or dull photographer, the talk is of a technical parameter and not a compositional one. On the balance though he is some what correct and the important thing to get out of all this is what works for the one holding the camera whether that be a kit lens, the nifty fifty or L glass. What works for any of you may not be good for me and vice versa its the same as artists with brushes or carpenters with chisels. :D

But what about his quote -

I think there are but
a handful of photographers who, with the naked eye, can tell whether you took a particular

shot with a zoom lens or a prime lens.

Anyone here one of those handful?

Nov 11, 2009 16:41

.
Jim
.
f o t o w o r xexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Quad
Goldmember
Quad's Avatar
1,872 posts

Joined Nov 2005
MORE INFO

ConDigital wrote in post #8998294external link
But what about his quote -



Anyone here one of those handful?



Well one thing I do remember is the first time I saw my slides comes back when I had used a Leica I saw there was something vastly different about those slides. I remember the colour seemed to have texture that I had never seen before. It reminded me of the first time I was fitted for glasses all of a sudden I saw textures in the world that I never saw before.

I suppose some zoom lenses could have the same quality (I disagree that they have to be 2.8 lenses as I think the 70-200 f4, for example, is outstanding [Being a Nikon shooter he is maybe not exposed to good f4 lenses and maybe not even good primes I don't know what Nikon offers in those regards or what experience he has]) as some primes. But Kelby does not say that primes are not better (in the most general of senses) as he does give that there are some people that can see the difference so then there must be some difference.

There are many people here who wax poetically about the difference between different 50mm lenses so I am going to guess they are not completely self-deluded and they actually do appreciate the difference between the half dozen or so 50's they own.... cough ...gasrocks ...cough.

The difference in lenses are very easily masked by other variables like noise, hand shake, processing, paper surfaces, sensor technology and the list goes on. This makes saying that one can see the difference (all the time) that much more difficult.

Nov 11, 2009 17:12



LOG IN TO REPLY
alex66
Member
107 posts
Joined Feb 2006
MORE INFO

ConDigital wrote in post #8998294external link
But what about his quote -



Anyone here one of those handful?

There will be some that notice subtle differences in sharpness and it will be important for them just as some will notice distortion and hate it. Then there will be those that claim to see these differences but don't than there will be those that say hey this lens has some bad barrel distortion it gives it an interesting flavor and I like it. At the end of the day there are various forms of snobbery in everything and there are people who are perfectionists and certain faults bug them, then there are the pragmatists who just make do. Like I said its all very personal and if using primes or zooms gives you what your looking for thats what matters. I am in the last year of a photography degree and having spent a long time looking at photography I can tell you there are a lot of great photographs taken with very basic gear, its what works for them.

Nov 11, 2009 18:48

Stuff
Feed Your Head

LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
32,774 posts
GALLERY: 23 photos
Joined May 2007

Oak Park, Illinois
MORE INFO

alex66 wrote in post #8998984external link
There will be some that notice subtle differences in sharpness and it will be important for them just as some will notice distortion and hate it. Then there will be those that claim to see these differences but don't than there will be those that say hey this lens has some bad barrel distortion it gives it an interesting flavor and I like it. At the end of the day there are various forms of snobbery in everything and there are people who are perfectionists and certain faults bug them, then there are the pragmatists who just make do. Like I said its all very personal and if using primes or zooms gives you what your looking for thats what matters. I am in the last year of a photography degree and having spent a long time looking at photography I can tell you there are a lot of great photographs taken with very basic gear, its what works for them.

Well said.

Nov 11, 2009 18:55



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
CAL ­ Imagery
Goldmember
CAL Imagery's Avatar
3,375 posts

Joined Apr 2008

O-H
MORE INFO

ConDigital wrote in post #8998294external link
But what about his quote -



Anyone here one of those handful?

I doubt many could tell a different between a picture taken with a zoom or a prime, except for shooting wide open. If it's a "close range" shot with a prime wide open, it'll be much more noticeable than any lens at f/8, for example.

However, along the same lines, I would like to see people take pictures with a FF that can the "average" advanced photographer or greater could unequivocally say "that DOF came from a FF, not a cropper!"

Nov 11, 2009 19:28

Christian

LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,816 posts
Joined Sep 2005

CT
MORE INFO

ConDigital wrote in post #8998294external link
But what about his quote -

Anyone here one of those handful?

A few pages back you asked the same question:

ConDigital wrote in post #8986304external link
As Scott says -

"I think there are but a handful of photographers who, with the naked eye, can tell whether you took a particular shot with a zoom lens or a prime lens."

To which I responded:

timnosenzo wrote in post #8986340external link
According to your gear list, it looks like you have plenty of expensive and not-so-expensive lenses. Can you tell the difference in IQ?

You have f/2.8 zooms, f/4 zooms, and some consumer zooms. Can you tell the difference between them?

Nov 11, 2009 20:12

connecticut wedding photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
fotoworx
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I get 'em pregnant"
fotoworx's Avatar
4,547 posts

Joined Mar 2009
MORE INFO

nphsbuckeye wrote in post #8999201external link
I doubt many could tell a different between a picture taken with a zoom or a prime, except for shooting wide open. If it's a "close range" shot with a prime wide open, it'll be much more noticeable than any lens at f/8, for example.

However, along the same lines, I would like to see people take pictures with a FF that can the "average" advanced photographer or greater could unequivocally say "that DOF came from a FF, not a cropper!"

Thanks Christian

Nov 11, 2009 20:16

.
Jim
.
f o t o w o r xexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
WhyFi
Goldmember
WhyFi's Avatar
2,405 posts
GALLERY: 43 photos
Joined Apr 2008

I got a castle in Brooklyn, that's where I dwell.
MORE INFO

timnosenzo wrote in post #8999410external link
A few pages back you asked the same question:

To which I responded:

You have f/2.8 zooms, f/4 zooms, and some consumer zooms. Can you tell the difference between them?

He likes to ignore any good points by "the opposition," which is pretty good indication of the openness of the discussion.

Nov 11, 2009 20:30

Do what works for you.
Bill is my name - I'm the most wanted man on my island, except I'm not on my island, of course. More's the pity.
Gear | Webexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY

36,733 views & 0 likes for this thread
Scott Kelby -The Truth About Lenses - Fixed- Length Prime Lenses Vs. Zooms
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00278 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is Clary84
811 guests, 628 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014