![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
Hi all,
this sunday i made some sport shots of a fieldhockey game. with iso's at 250 / 400 and shutters above /1200 i am wondering why my shots are not 100% sharp (look at full-size in flickr) and why they are so damn grainy for such iso's doesnt seem right #1 ![]() full-size on flickr #2 ![]() full-size on flickr #3 ![]() full-size on flickr #4 ![]() full-size on flickr |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Man I Like to Fart
|
Did you have to pull back exposure in post?
__________________
NYC Wedding Photographer | Blog | facebook | Galleries | Flickr | Gear My 5D Mark III Review |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 230
|
the focus is pretty off in a few of those.
__________________
1D M3, 5D, 35L, 85L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 580EX, 580EXII D3, D700, D100, 14-24, 24-120VR, 50AFS, 80-200AFD, 105Micro, 200F2 VR Wedding, Portrait Photographer - Ricky Cheong |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Goldmember
|
I agree with the above assumption. If you underexposed during the shoot, and then upped the exposure in PP, you'll get some level of visible noise. FWIW, I don't see anything wrong the first one. Do you have the histogram of the original RAWs?
__________________
5D Mark III 17-40L | 24-70L | 35L | 85L II | 580EXII | Complete Gear List | Flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
i attached some files!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
So that looks like a full 1 stop exposure boost and lots of sharpening. Boosting the exposure adds noise and sharpening too much, sharpens the noise. Double whammy.
__________________
Taylor Galleries: Flickr Photoshop.com 60D - ELPH 100HS - 15-85 - 30 1.4 - 50-135 2.8 - 55-250 IS |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Cream of the "Prop"
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
Posts: 57,107
|
The OP does have some pretty high compression though on the Flickr images.
Quite the jpg artifacts.
__________________
"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 295
|
These images look very professional. Are you a professional sport photographer?
__________________
20D | 17-40 f/4 | 50 f/1.4 | 100 f/2.8 IS | 200 f/2.8 | 400 f/5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Planes, trains and ham radio...
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,879
|
f2.8? No depth of field...
__________________
John |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
|
but guys, you say i need to pump up my exposure for over a stop. but arent my settings wrong then?
i just had it on AV, the 1d should gimme good results right? weather was cloudy so a solid soft light source. (its was not dark, light clouds) what do i need to do, if i used exposure bias it was almost always partial over exposed! what kind of metering modes you guys use for this kind of sports? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Cream of the "Prop"
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
Posts: 57,107
|
An outdoor event like this one with consistent lighting? I'd be in Manual Mode.
One of the easiest ways to meter in Manual Mode can be found HERE
__________________
"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
|
but isent the light on the left side of the field a lot darker than in the back?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Cream of the "Prop"
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
Posts: 57,107
|
Quote:
If you're in Av mode and you're switching between the white jerseys and the orange jerseys, you're going to get different exposures. The shots metered on the white jerseys are going to come out darker. Another reason to shoot Manual exposure.
__________________
"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK,don't move ehre,it rains a lot, it's incredibly violent and the women pee standing up..
Posts: 1,706
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dipak49...7602470636767/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/dipak49...7604292148339/ Canon EOS 1d mk III, Canon EOS 5d,Canon EOS 400d, 24-70 mm F2.8 L, ef 24-105 F4 L IS, ef 17-40 mm F4 L, 70-200 mm f2.8 IS L, 100-400 mm IS L, 50mmm f1.8, 85mmf1.8mm, ef 35 mm f1.4L, ef 135 mm f2 L,Canon Powershot G9, Epson p400-, hyperdrive space 120gb |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Two grainy images.... | civicseth | Critique Corner | 5 | 11th of November 2006 (Sat) 16:10 |
| at what ISO do your images become grainy? | pprrad | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 8 | 31st of October 2006 (Tue) 16:41 |
| My images come out grainy when I sharpen | tfarias | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 14 | 5th of August 2006 (Sat) 08:20 |
| focusing and grainy images | larann78 | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 11 | 4th of August 2006 (Fri) 23:29 |
| RAW images look grainy! | NRR | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 11 | 30th of July 2006 (Sun) 00:41 |