Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Equipment Talk' section > Accessories & Storage
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23rd of September 2009 (Wed)   #1
MrGreen
Senior Member
 
MrGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,252
Default Review: Photo Clam PC-44NS Ball Head

Hello, it's me again; you're friendly neighbourhood reviewer. Ok, well not really since I've only done two reviews, but still I'm here again to review the Photo Clam PC-44NS ballhead. Kerry Thalman at Really Big Cameras asked if I would be kind enough to do a review on this new ball head from Photo Clam since he really liked my previous review on the set-up I currently own, and purchased from him earlier in the year. You can see that review here: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/....php?p=7645025

Anyways, on to the review. Since I own another Photo Clam ball head, but one model down, I thought it would be a good idea to compare these two side-by-side. Most people are going to think about purchasing either one of these two since they are very similar, so I think it's a good fair comparison.

On the left is the Photo Clam PC-40NS ball head mounted on my Feisol CT-3442 tripod, and on the right is the PC-44NS. As you can see, the red colour of the 44NS really stands out and personally I think it makes the ball head look sweet. I really wish I had the option of ordering a colour when I bought mine.



Just showing off the 44NS compared to the 40NS in beautiful sunset glow!



Here I am showing just how much larger the clamping part is on the 44NS compared to the 40NS. Not needed as far as I am concerned, but it's nice to have a bit more surface area clamping down I guess. The Arca system is so good though that there is absolutely no difference in holding power between the two. Both are amazing!



This image should illustrate the size difference not only in the mountain base, but the adjustment knobs. The panning knobs are exactly the same so far as I remember, but the ball head knob is noticeably larger on the 44NS. Does this matter? Eh, who knows really. For me I feel the 40NS' ball head knob is a good size, so any larger isn't really "needed" but if it's there then why not. I didn't notice any difference in "precision" having the larger knob - which is really the only thing you might notice since there's a larger diametre for a turning circle.



As you can see by this image, the head is fully Arca-Swiss compatible. Meaning you can use any L-bracket from Kirk, RRS, etc. This is a major feature in my opinion to look for in any professional level ball head.



Ok, so now that I've done some product shots to show how awesome this ball head looks, I'll talk a bit more about how it performs and back this up with some image crops.

So I've been using this ball head for almost two months now, switching back and forth between the 40NS and the 44NS. I wanted to see
if I would miss using the 44NS since it's larger, or if I would miss my "smaller" 40NS ball head. Honestly, I did notice a difference
from the first time I used the 44NS. The larger ball is a slight bit nicer to move around, but I've never had any problems with my 40NS
so I don't see this as any issue that would make me buy the 44 over the 40.

I really couldn't tell much difference in vibration control between the two when I had my Tokina 11-16mm, Canon 24-105, or Canon 55-250 lens on.
They both handled all those focal lengths really well and quite equally. I knew if I really wanted to push the limit and test them I needed to mount my
Sigma 150-500 Bigmos! I mounted the lens to the head via the tripod collar and I did some testing.

Both ball heads held this lens VERY securely. Once the ball heads were locked down there was no droop, even when the head isn't perfectly level. This impressed
me a lot.

I'm not going to post a million crops, because well frankly I don't care enough to spend that much time, but I did take a lot of comparison photos and then I
took the best ones and did some crops of those.

Here they are. First image is the Sigma mounted on the PC-40NS at approximately a 30-40 degree angle looking upwards.



Next up is the Sigma again mounted exactly the same way as before on the PC-44NS.



Is there a difference? Yeah, but not much and going through all the other images I shot I can say with confidence these are basically equal ball heads. The 44NS
will handle the vibrations a little better, meaning it'll kill them a bit sooner, but not enough to make me want to buy it over the 40NS.

Basically what I did was a gave the camera a light smack and looked through the viewfinder to see how long it took for the vibrations to die down. On the 40NS it took
roughly 5 seconds, whereas the 44NS it took approximately 3 seconds. This is not scientific by any means, but there was a noticeable enough difference for me to see
using this method. The images above were taken after I saw that vibrations had stopped. So, I took the first image 5 seconds after the smack, and the second image
3 seconds after the smack.

My final thoughts on this ball head are that it's a superb product and well deserving of the professional name it carries. Photo Clam make some extremely well engineered
ball heads that rival the other top ball head manufacturers.
__________________
My site: www.millionflame.com
Gear: 7D - Zeikos Grip, Rebel XTi/400D - Opteka Grip, EF 24-105mm f/4L, EF 100mm f/2.8L MACRO, EF 50mm f/1.8 (Nifty Fifty), EF-s 55-250mm (Nifty Two-Fifty), Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, Σ 150-500mm (Bigmos), Σ 35mm f/1.4, Σ 85mm f/1.4, Feisol CT-3442 CF Tripod, Photo Clam PC-40NS Ball head, 580 EX II Flash
MrGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 9th of June 2010 (Wed)   #2
DANATTHEROCK
Senior Member
 
DANATTHEROCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,264
Default Re: Review: Photo Clam PC-44NS Ball Head

Great review MrGreen. Thanks for the info last month as well. I bought my Feisol and Photo Clam from Kerry after talking with you. Took it to Alaska for my first trip. Amazing tripod and ballhead. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

-Dan
__________________
Canon 5D Mark II & 50D with 17-40, 24-105, 100-400, 50 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8 macro, and 1.4TC

FEISOL CT-3442 (ARL) tripod w/ Photo Clam 40-NS ballhead

Last edited by DANATTHEROCK : 9th of June 2010 (Wed) at 04:52.
DANATTHEROCK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th of June 2010 (Wed)   #3
MrGreen
Senior Member
 
MrGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,252
Default Re: Review: Photo Clam PC-44NS Ball Head

Quote:
Originally Posted by DANATTHEROCK View Post
Great review MrGreen. Thanks for the info last month as well. I bought my Feisol and Photo Clam from Kerry after talking with you. Took it to Alaska for my first trip. Amazing tripod and ballhead. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

-Dan
Great to hear! How do you like the new ARL locks? I haven't tried those yet but they seem quite nice. That's one thing I wish mine had for sure.
__________________
My site: www.millionflame.com
Gear: 7D - Zeikos Grip, Rebel XTi/400D - Opteka Grip, EF 24-105mm f/4L, EF 100mm f/2.8L MACRO, EF 50mm f/1.8 (Nifty Fifty), EF-s 55-250mm (Nifty Two-Fifty), Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, Σ 150-500mm (Bigmos), Σ 35mm f/1.4, Σ 85mm f/1.4, Feisol CT-3442 CF Tripod, Photo Clam PC-40NS Ball head, 580 EX II Flash
MrGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 9th of June 2010 (Wed)   #4
DANATTHEROCK
Senior Member
 
DANATTHEROCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,264
Default Re: Review: Photo Clam PC-44NS Ball Head

I have never used a non ARL twist lock, so my insight is limited. I had used lever lock Manfrottos prior to getting the Feisol. The ARL on the Feisol seems to work great and the legs are very secure once locked in. I was just amazed how compact and light this thing is. I was hiking 3-4 miles per day up and down a river in SE Alaska flyfishing for steelhead. I could barely tell I had this thing strapped on my backpack. Top shelf product all the way. Thanks again.

-Dan
__________________
Canon 5D Mark II & 50D with 17-40, 24-105, 100-400, 50 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8 macro, and 1.4TC

FEISOL CT-3442 (ARL) tripod w/ Photo Clam 40-NS ballhead
DANATTHEROCK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of October 2011 (Sat)   #5
mnml
Member
 
mnml's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 495
Default Re: Review: Photo Clam PC-44NS Ball Head

Cool review. The red finish look very nice
__________________
Fuji X-T1 | 23mm | 56mm | 55-200mm
flickr
mnml is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Review : Manfrotto 190CXPRO3 with Markins Q3 Ball Head rubber_duckie Accessories & Storage 55 7th of July 2012 (Sat) 11:53
pairing Manfrotto tripod with Photo Clam head? JRSand Accessories & Storage 7 5th of September 2009 (Sat) 21:24
Promaster ball head initial review stogiepuffer Accessories & Storage 1 13th of April 2009 (Mon) 02:48
Review: Photo Clam PC-74NS Ballhead Bubble Accessories & Storage 2 9th of March 2009 (Mon) 17:57
Benro M-227n6 Tripod And KS-2 Ball Head Mini-Review Twitch1977 Accessories & Storage 23 16th of January 2007 (Tue) 13:30


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:57.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.