LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Review: Photo Clam PC-44NS Ball Head

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories
Thread started 23 Sep 2009 (Wednesday) 12:35   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
MrGreen
Goldmember
MrGreen's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
1,252 posts
Vancouver, BC
[MORE/SHARE]

Hello, it's me again; you're friendly neighbourhood reviewer. Ok, well not really since I've only done two reviews, but still I'm here again to review the Photo Clam PC-44NS ballhead. Kerry Thalman at Really Big Cameras asked if I would be kind enough to do a review on this new ball head from Photo Clam since he really liked my previous review on the set-up I currently own, and purchased from him earlier in the year. You can see that review here: http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?p=7​645025

Anyways, on to the review. Since I own another Photo Clam ball head, but one model down, I thought it would be a good idea to compare these two side-by-side. Most people are going to think about purchasing either one of these two since they are very similar, so I think it's a good fair comparison.

On the left is the Photo Clam PC-40NS ball head mounted on my Feisol CT-3442 tripod, and on the right is the PC-44NS. As you can see, the red colour of the 44NS really stands out and personally I think it makes the ball head look sweet. I really wish I had the option of ordering a colour when I bought mine.

IMAGE: http://www.millionflame.com/photo/Reviews/PhotoClam44NS/images/IMG_7540.jpg
IMAGE: http://www.millionflame.com/photo/Reviews/PhotoClam44NS/images/IMG_7542.jpg

Just showing off the 44NS compared to the 40NS in beautiful sunset glow!

IMAGE: http://www.millionflame.com/photo/Reviews/PhotoClam44NS/images/IMG_7546.jpg

Here I am showing just how much larger the clamping part is on the 44NS compared to the 40NS. Not needed as far as I am concerned, but it's nice to have a bit more surface area clamping down I guess. The Arca system is so good though that there is absolutely no difference in holding power between the two. Both are amazing!

IMAGE: http://www.millionflame.com/photo/Reviews/PhotoClam44NS/images/IMG_7548.jpg

This image should illustrate the size difference not only in the mountain base, but the adjustment knobs. The panning knobs are exactly the same so far as I remember, but the ball head knob is noticeably larger on the 44NS. Does this matter? Eh, who knows really. For me I feel the 40NS' ball head knob is a good size, so any larger isn't really "needed" but if it's there then why not. I didn't notice any difference in "precision" having the larger knob - which is really the only thing you might notice since there's a larger diametre for a turning circle.

IMAGE: http://www.millionflame.com/photo/Reviews/PhotoClam44NS/images/IMG_7551.jpg

As you can see by this image, the head is fully Arca-Swiss compatible. Meaning you can use any L-bracket from Kirk, RRS, etc. This is a major feature in my opinion to look for in any professional level ball head.

IMAGE: http://www.millionflame.com/photo/Reviews/PhotoClam44NS/images/IMG_7555.jpg

Ok, so now that I've done some product shots to show how awesome this ball head looks, I'll talk a bit more about how it performs and back this up with some image crops.

So I've been using this ball head for almost two months now, switching back and forth between the 40NS and the 44NS. I wanted to see
if I would miss using the 44NS since it's larger, or if I would miss my "smaller" 40NS ball head. Honestly, I did notice a difference
from the first time I used the 44NS. The larger ball is a slight bit nicer to move around, but I've never had any problems with my 40NS
so I don't see this as any issue that would make me buy the 44 over the 40.

I really couldn't tell much difference in vibration control between the two when I had my Tokina 11-16mm, Canon 24-105, or Canon 55-250 lens on.
They both handled all those focal lengths really well and quite equally. I knew if I really wanted to push the limit and test them I needed to mount my
Sigma 150-500 Bigmos! I mounted the lens to the head via the tripod collar and I did some testing.

Both ball heads held this lens VERY securely. Once the ball heads were locked down there was no droop, even when the head isn't perfectly level. This impressed
me a lot.

I'm not going to post a million crops, because well frankly I don't care enough to spend that much time, but I did take a lot of comparison photos and then I
took the best ones and did some crops of those.

Here they are. First image is the Sigma mounted on the PC-40NS at approximately a 30-40 degree angle looking upwards.

IMAGE: http://www.millionflame.com/photo/Reviews/PhotoClam44NS/images/IMG_6295.jpg

Next up is the Sigma again mounted exactly the same way as before on the PC-44NS.

IMAGE: http://www.millionflame.com/photo/Reviews/PhotoClam44NS/images/IMG_6291.jpg

Is there a difference? Yeah, but not much and going through all the other images I shot I can say with confidence these are basically equal ball heads. The 44NS
will handle the vibrations a little better, meaning it'll kill them a bit sooner, but not enough to make me want to buy it over the 40NS.

Basically what I did was a gave the camera a light smack and looked through the viewfinder to see how long it took for the vibrations to die down. On the 40NS it took
roughly 5 seconds, whereas the 44NS it took approximately 3 seconds. This is not scientific by any means, but there was a noticeable enough difference for me to see
using this method. The images above were taken after I saw that vibrations had stopped. So, I took the first image 5 seconds after the smack, and the second image
3 seconds after the smack.

My final thoughts on this ball head are that it's a superb product and well deserving of the professional name it carries. Photo Clam make some extremely well engineered
ball heads that rival the other top ball head manufacturers.

Post #1, Sep 23, 2009 12:35:05


My site: www.millionflame.comexternal link
Gear: 7D - Zeikos Grip, Rebel XTi/400D - Opteka Grip, EF 24-105mm f/4L, EF 100mm f/2.8L MACRO, EF 50mm f/1.8 (Nifty Fifty), EF-s 55-250mm (Nifty Two-Fifty), Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, Σ 150-500mm (Bigmos), Σ 35mm f/1.4, Σ 85mm f/1.4, Feisol CT-3442 CF Tripod, Photo Clam PC-40NS Ball head, 580 EX II Flash

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
DANATTHEROCK
Goldmember
DANATTHEROCK's Avatar
Joined Apr 2008
1,264 posts
North Carolina
[MORE/SHARE]

Great review MrGreen. Thanks for the info last month as well. I bought my Feisol and Photo Clam from Kerry after talking with you. Took it to Alaska for my first trip. Amazing tripod and ballhead. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

-Dan

Post #2, Jun 09, 2010 02:37:05


Canon 5D Mark II & 50D with 17-40, 24-105, 100-400, 50 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8 macro, and 1.4TC

FEISOL CT-3442 (ARL) tripod w/ Photo Clam 40-NS ballhead:lol:

LOG IN TO REPLY
MrGreen
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
MrGreen's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
1,252 posts
Vancouver, BC
[MORE/SHARE]

DANATTHEROCK wrote in post #10329388external link
Great review MrGreen. Thanks for the info last month as well. I bought my Feisol and Photo Clam from Kerry after talking with you. Took it to Alaska for my first trip. Amazing tripod and ballhead. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

-Dan

Great to hear! How do you like the new ARL locks? I haven't tried those yet but they seem quite nice. That's one thing I wish mine had for sure.

Post #3, Jun 09, 2010 11:27:23


My site: www.millionflame.comexternal link
Gear: 7D - Zeikos Grip, Rebel XTi/400D - Opteka Grip, EF 24-105mm f/4L, EF 100mm f/2.8L MACRO, EF 50mm f/1.8 (Nifty Fifty), EF-s 55-250mm (Nifty Two-Fifty), Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, Σ 150-500mm (Bigmos), Σ 35mm f/1.4, Σ 85mm f/1.4, Feisol CT-3442 CF Tripod, Photo Clam PC-40NS Ball head, 580 EX II Flash

LOG IN TO REPLY
DANATTHEROCK
Goldmember
DANATTHEROCK's Avatar
Joined Apr 2008
1,264 posts
North Carolina
[MORE/SHARE]

I have never used a non ARL twist lock, so my insight is limited. I had used lever lock Manfrottos prior to getting the Feisol. The ARL on the Feisol seems to work great and the legs are very secure once locked in. I was just amazed how compact and light this thing is. I was hiking 3-4 miles per day up and down a river in SE Alaska flyfishing for steelhead. I could barely tell I had this thing strapped on my backpack. Top shelf product all the way. Thanks again.

-Dan

Post #4, Jun 09, 2010 18:55:35


Canon 5D Mark II & 50D with 17-40, 24-105, 100-400, 50 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8 macro, and 1.4TC

FEISOL CT-3442 (ARL) tripod w/ Photo Clam 40-NS ballhead:lol:

LOG IN TO REPLY
mnml
Senior Member
mnml's Avatar
Joined Apr 2011
515 posts
Ladera Ranch, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Cool review. The red finish look very nice

Post #5, Oct 08, 2011 13:49:10


5D3 | 24-105L

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)


LIST NEARBY THREADS
10,221 views & 0 likes for this thread
Review: Photo Clam PC-44NS Ball Head
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00122 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
823 guests, 518 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is ozaero

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.