Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation
Thread started 09 Oct 2009 (Friday) 22:14
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Foliage / Waterfall HDR

 
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Scottes's Avatar
12,842 posts
Joined Nov 2003
A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Oct 09, 2009 22:14 |  #1

I'm not sure if I even like this. I'm not sure if it sucks or if I'm just in a mood.

Comments appreciated.

IMAGE: http://www.itsanadventure.com/postimages/Rocky_Gorge_104161-5.jpg

You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Infoexternal link
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tmcman
Goldmember
tmcman's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
NJ
Oct 09, 2009 22:41 |  #2

Not sure I like the long run of the stream down to the foreground edge.
But the meeting place of water, rock, trees and sun at the waterfall is outstanding.
Thanks for sharing.


Comments, Questions, Observations Welcome
1DsII, 17-40, 50 f/1.4, TS-E 24mm f/3.5L, 70-200 f/4L IS, Sony A6000, 16-50, Gitzo 1541 w/ Markins M10 ballhead.
"Art always shows itself by doing much with few and simple things." A. W. Dow

LOG IN TO REPLY
Kevin
Cream of the Crop
5,920 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Oct 09, 2009 23:19 |  #3

hee...hee..you may be in a mood, but I don't care for it either. Too much foreground and the water has no definable detail for me. Don't shoot me;)




LOG IN TO REPLY
wolfden
Goldmember
wolfden's Avatar
1,439 posts
Joined May 2008
Oct 09, 2009 23:45 |  #4

on the plus side, the fall colors are looking great!


~KJS~
Photos by KJSexternal link | Flickrexternal link | Blogexternal link | 500pxexternal link | Google+external link
Canon 60D Shooter

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
THREAD ­ STARTER
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Scottes's Avatar
12,842 posts
Joined Nov 2003
A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Oct 09, 2009 23:52 |  #5

OK, it's agreed. Someone delete this thread. :-)


On the good side, I have a wide-angle shot that doesn't contain the long water in front. I'll play with that one tomorrow I guess. I spent about an hour and 4 gigs on this waterfall. I've got to have *something* decent from all that work.

I hopr...


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Infoexternal link
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

LOG IN TO REPLY
Kevin
Cream of the Crop
5,920 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Oct 09, 2009 23:54 |  #6

Scottes wrote in post #8794342external link
OK, it's agreed. Someone delete this thread. :-)


On the good side, I have a wide-angle shot that doesn't contain the long water in front. I'll play with that one tomorrow I guess. I spent about an hour and 4 gigs on this waterfall. I've got to have *something* decent from all that work.

I hopr...

I think we should keep this in perpetuity for the future civilizations.:lol:




LOG IN TO REPLY
Gary ­ McDuffie
Goldmember
Gary McDuffie's Avatar
3,022 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Scottsbluff, NE USA
Oct 10, 2009 00:43 |  #7

Ok, so I'm weird! I really like it. I like almost everything about it. As for the detail in the water, I'm a fan of time expo'd water, love it, especially the fall area. Ok, maybe a little less foreground would be better, but I'd hang it just like it is.


Gary
"I'm not much of an artist, but I like to document certain things that I see."
----------
5DII, 7D, some L, Manfroto one and three legged devices, shooting & learning bit by bit via POTN

LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Goldmember
4,971 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Philadelphia, PA USA
Oct 10, 2009 09:51 |  #8

Aesthetics aside, I think it is a very nice piece technically. The range of highlights and shadows is captured very well, the color is rich and the tonemapping is natural and pleasing, not garish and cartoony. It appears a little oversharpened or overly local contrasty, especially in the leaves - I think the rock can hold a little more of that treatment before it gets to be too much, but here it seems like the limits of the rock have been reached.

It may not be possible, but shoot in that light from down low, looking upstream, through that cut, at the sun drenched falls. Try framing the shot with the cut walls in shadow,but well defined shadows - we are shooting HDR or course!

Keep at it - the colors are lovely.

Kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​omexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
THREAD ­ STARTER
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Scottes's Avatar
12,842 posts
Joined Nov 2003
A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Oct 10, 2009 13:10 |  #9

I was wondering if someone would mention over-sharpening. I hit it with SmartSharpen: highlight fade 100% at range 70, radius 0.3, amount - wait for it - 23%.

I just barely *kissed* it with sharpening. Damn that 24-70mm L, it's too sharp,

:D


Seriously though, it really needs creative sharpening, not a global method. But I was too lazy since I didn't really like it by the time I was done.

I could not get lower - I was on a bridge. Tough to avoid tourists bouncing the bridge with a 2-minute exposure!


Thanks for the technical comments. I do like it for that.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Infoexternal link
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Goldmember
4,971 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Philadelphia, PA USA
Oct 10, 2009 13:28 |  #10

DId you have "More Accurate" checked in the Smart Sharpen dialog? I find that it is all but useless and creates the kind of wormy effect that the leaves exhibit. Uncheck it.

Kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​omexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
THREAD ­ STARTER
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Scottes's Avatar
12,842 posts
Joined Nov 2003
A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Oct 10, 2009 17:24 |  #11

Hmmm, I probably did have that checked. I'll try it on and off on the next foliage shot I process.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Infoexternal link
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

LOG IN TO REPLY
waterj2
Member
waterj2's Avatar
126 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Jamaica Plain, MA
Oct 10, 2009 20:12 as a reply to Scottes's post |  #12

You could just crop it down to the top portion. It looks great with a square crop so that you cut out the bottom part.


Jeremy(my flickrexternal link)
Canon EOS 30D, EOS Rebel K2, S100
Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
Canon 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
grandad35
Member
101 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Mass, USA
Oct 11, 2009 06:22 as a reply to waterj2's post |  #13

Does the water look any better in the individual shots? If so, massage the one that has the best lighting on the water to closely match the water in the HDR, add it as a layer and mask it to show only the water. This obviously doesn't work if the HDR was generated from a single shot.

Was that shot taken along the Kangamangus River? Here is an old crappy shot (from a P&S) from what looks to be the same area.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

5D-II | 7D | 5D | S5 | 70-200 F/2.8L IS | 24-105 f/4L IS | EFS 18-135 IS F/3.5-5.6 | 50 f/1.8
2x Tcon
| EX580 | EX430 | EX420

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
THREAD ­ STARTER
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Scottes's Avatar
12,842 posts
Joined Nov 2003
A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Oct 11, 2009 08:24 |  #14

Waterj12 - yes, a crop does look better. Good idea.

Grandad35 - I'd say that we both shot from the same exact location, the bridge across the Rocky Gorge, but you zoomed in.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Infoexternal link
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

LOG IN TO REPLY
buddy4344
Goldmember
Joined Nov 2006
Allentown, PA
Oct 13, 2009 17:20 |  #15

Location has potential, but the exposure time seems a little too long. Water is a little too silky with no detail. - maybe just a style difference. Fall colors look great.

I just sent you a PM regarding shooting in your area.


Buddy4344

Gear: Canon 1Dx MkII, 7D MkII, Canon Lenses: 100 macro, 100-400 Ver.IIL IS, 24-105L IS, Canon 17-40, Canon 1.4x TCon, Rokinon 14mm. Kenko extension tubes, Kenko 1.4x pro TCon.and Kiboko 30L and 22L+

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,725 views & 1 like for this thread
Foliage / Waterfall HDR
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00214 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is satura
870 guests, 565 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016