![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 12,838
|
I'm not sure if I even like this. I'm not sure if it sucks or if I'm just in a mood.
Comments appreciated. ![]()
__________________
You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers. Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info Finally, I have a Gallery! Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR© |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Goldmember
|
Not sure I like the long run of the stream down to the foreground edge.
But the meeting place of water, rock, trees and sun at the waterfall is outstanding. Thanks for sharing.
__________________
Comments, Questions, Observations Welcome 1DsII, G12, 17-40, 50 f/1.4, TS-E 24mm f/3.5L, 70-200 f/4L IS, Gitzo 1541 w/ Markins M10 ballhead. "Art always shows itself by doing much with few and simple things." A. W. Dow |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hotel California, Second Floor, Third Door On The Right, next to the big rock
Posts: 5,920
|
hee...hee..you may be in a mood, but I don't care for it either. Too much foreground and the water has no definable detail for me. Don't shoot me
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#5 |
|
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 12,838
|
OK, it's agreed. Someone delete this thread.
On the good side, I have a wide-angle shot that doesn't contain the long water in front. I'll play with that one tomorrow I guess. I spent about an hour and 4 gigs on this waterfall. I've got to have *something* decent from all that work. I hopr...
__________________
You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers. Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info Finally, I have a Gallery! Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR© |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hotel California, Second Floor, Third Door On The Right, next to the big rock
Posts: 5,920
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Goldmember
|
Ok, so I'm weird! I really like it. I like almost everything about it. As for the detail in the water, I'm a fan of time expo'd water, love it, especially the fall area. Ok, maybe a little less foreground would be better, but I'd hang it just like it is.
__________________
Gary If you're going to shoot something, use a Canon! ---------- 7D, some L, a Froto, constantly shooting & learning via POTN |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Goldmember
|
Aesthetics aside, I think it is a very nice piece technically. The range of highlights and shadows is captured very well, the color is rich and the tonemapping is natural and pleasing, not garish and cartoony. It appears a little oversharpened or overly local contrasty, especially in the leaves - I think the rock can hold a little more of that treatment before it gets to be too much, but here it seems like the limits of the rock have been reached.
It may not be possible, but shoot in that light from down low, looking upstream, through that cut, at the sun drenched falls. Try framing the shot with the cut walls in shadow,but well defined shadows - we are shooting HDR or course! Keep at it - the colors are lovely. Kirk |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 12,838
|
I was wondering if someone would mention over-sharpening. I hit it with SmartSharpen: highlight fade 100% at range 70, radius 0.3, amount - wait for it - 23%.
I just barely *kissed* it with sharpening. Damn that 24-70mm L, it's too sharp, Seriously though, it really needs creative sharpening, not a global method. But I was too lazy since I didn't really like it by the time I was done. I could not get lower - I was on a bridge. Tough to avoid tourists bouncing the bridge with a 2-minute exposure! Thanks for the technical comments. I do like it for that.
__________________
You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers. Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info Finally, I have a Gallery! Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR© |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Goldmember
|
DId you have "More Accurate" checked in the Smart Sharpen dialog? I find that it is all but useless and creates the kind of wormy effect that the leaves exhibit. Uncheck it.
Kirk |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 12,838
|
Hmmm, I probably did have that checked. I'll try it on and off on the next foliage shot I process.
__________________
You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers. Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info Finally, I have a Gallery! Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR© |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
|
You could just crop it down to the top portion. It looks great with a square crop so that you cut out the bottom part.
__________________
Jeremy(my flickr) Canon EOS 30D, EOS Rebel K2, SD600Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon 580EX II |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
|
Does the water look any better in the individual shots? If so, massage the one that has the best lighting on the water to closely match the water in the HDR, add it as a layer and mask it to show only the water. This obviously doesn't work if the HDR was generated from a single shot.
Was that shot taken along the Kangamangus River? Here is an old crappy shot (from a P&S) from what looks to be the same area.
__________________
5D-II | 7D | 5D | S5 | 70-200 F/2.8L IS | 24-105 f/4L IS | EFS 18-135 IS F/3.5-5.6 | 50 f/1.8 2x Tcon | EX580 | EX430 | EX420 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 12,838
|
Waterj12 - yes, a crop does look better. Good idea.
Grandad35 - I'd say that we both shot from the same exact location, the bridge across the Rocky Gorge, but you zoomed in.
__________________
You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers. Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info Finally, I have a Gallery! Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR© |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
|
Location has potential, but the exposure time seems a little too long. Water is a little too silky with no detail. - maybe just a style difference. Fall colors look great.
I just sent you a PM regarding shooting in your area.
__________________
Buddy4344 Gear: Canon 5D MkIII, 7D, 30D, 300D, Canon Lenses: 100 macro, 100-400L IS, 24-105L IS, 400DO IS, 500L IS. Kenko extension tubes, Kenko 1.4x pro TCon.and Kiboko 30L and 22L+ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NY Fall foliage. | Subimatt | Nature & Landscapes | 3 | 19th of October 2008 (Sun) 20:03 |
| Fall Foliage | Airedale1 | Nature & Landscapes | 11 | 17th of October 2008 (Fri) 14:47 |
| Foliage-what do you think? | cali | Wildlife | 1 | 24th of October 2006 (Tue) 01:21 |
| Foliage ..Please C/C..Thanks | yanz | Wildlife | 2 | 16th of October 2006 (Mon) 19:22 |
| Foliage.. | nidus_22 | Nature & Landscapes | 9 | 20th of April 2006 (Thu) 23:20 |