Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 12 Oct 2009 (Monday) 21:02
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Zeiss Distagon T* 2/28 ZE

 
dolina
Goldmember
dolina's Avatar
4,699 posts
Joined Mar 2009
34109
Oct 12, 2009 21:02 |  #1

May ship one day (who knows with Zeiss)... if you have it post it.

Someone on flickr has a copy http://www.flickr.com/​photos/silver2silicon/external link


Visit my Flickrexternal link, Facebookexternal link & 500pxexternal link and see my photos. :)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Brett
Goldmember
Brett's Avatar
4,176 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Ohio
Oct 12, 2009 21:29 |  #2

I don't have one, but in researching what the different Zeiss designations (Planar, Distagon, Sonnar, etc.), I came across this link: http://www.cartage.org​.lb ...s/carlzeiss/carlzei​ss.htmexternal link

Interesting information about Distagon, from that link:

This is a reversed telephoto lens, consisting of a large negative lens in front of an ordinary lens. This allows it to obtain a short overall focal length with elements of a larger and more manageable size, helps design a system that is favorable for both high relative aperture and wild-angular field, and increased the back focal distance beyond it's usual magnitude, which give space for the mirror of a SLR. The downsides are that is must be physically large, and of complex construction to correct all the aberrations, making the lens more expensive to produce. Reversed telephoto designs are rarely over 2 inches in focal length, and then it is only used for specific applications. Compared to the Biogon, it has a larger circle of illumination full aperture, though softer when wide open, though it is sharper when stopped down. Rear element does not interfere with mirrors in SLR's.



flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
dolina
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
dolina's Avatar
4,699 posts
Joined Mar 2009
34109
Feb 12, 2011 15:13 |  #3

Any samples?


Visit my Flickrexternal link, Facebookexternal link & 500pxexternal link and see my photos. :)

LOG IN TO REPLY
BlueTsunami
Goldmember
BlueTsunami's Avatar
1,021 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Feb 12, 2011 16:18 |  #4

Not a lot of people seem to have it (choose the 35/2 in favor between the two) but here's some samples with a 5DMKII on Flickr...

http://www.flickr.com ...d/sets/721576229680​58457/external link


Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
p360
Goldmember
p360's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Chandler, Arizona
Mar 02, 2011 22:15 as a reply to BlueTsunami's post |  #5

I have become such a fan of Zeiss in the last year or so, that I might actually sell my 24-70L to fund purchase of this one.

Versatility of zoom vs. ZEISS prime.., hmm.


-- p r a t y u s h -- portfolioexternal link flickrexternal link
Gear List + Marketplace Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
p360
Goldmember
p360's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Chandler, Arizona
Mar 06, 2011 14:02 as a reply to p360's post |  #6

Ok. I finally did it. Sold my 24-70L and ordered Zeiss 28/2 from B & H. Yaayy..!

I really like the Zeiss 3D look - rich colors and contrast, not to mention sharpness. The prime won over the zoom versatility.

It arrives on Friday.


-- p r a t y u s h -- portfolioexternal link flickrexternal link
Gear List + Marketplace Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
p360
Goldmember
p360's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Chandler, Arizona
Mar 12, 2011 21:01 as a reply to p360's post |  #7

This lens is going to get a lot of love from me.

One from today in Tucson. Very happy with the performance.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://pratyush360.com​/img/s9/v13/p902660473​-4.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

-- p r a t y u s h -- portfolioexternal link flickrexternal link
Gear List + Marketplace Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
p360
Goldmember
p360's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Chandler, Arizona
Mar 13, 2011 15:01 as a reply to p360's post |  #8

A couple more: Really liking this FL for walk-around photos. Great lens.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://pratyush360.com​/img/s8/v10/p32931959-4.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://pratyush360.com​/img/s3/v26/p380817941​-4.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

-- p r a t y u s h -- portfolioexternal link flickrexternal link
Gear List + Marketplace Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
BlueTsunami
Goldmember
BlueTsunami's Avatar
1,021 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Mar 13, 2011 20:58 |  #9

Looks fantastic! I really wanted to get this 28 but had to go with the Nikkor 28/2 AI since its cheaper. With that said the Zeiss 28 is supposed to be fantastic up close and at infinity where the Nikkor is bad at Infinity which is to say that I'll be getting the Zeiss 28 at some point in the future :)

Love the look of the blur in the third photo. The subject in focus pops too.


Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
p360
Goldmember
p360's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Chandler, Arizona
Mar 13, 2011 21:29 as a reply to BlueTsunami's post |  #10

^ Thanks.

This lens is on par with the rest of the Zeiss glass I own, great handling, very sharp, fantastic colors and contrast. And I just love the focal length: perfect for walk-around shots.


-- p r a t y u s h -- portfolioexternal link flickrexternal link
Gear List + Marketplace Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris67
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Dallas, TX
Apr 04, 2011 00:33 as a reply to p360's post |  #11

Just got a good deal on this lens off of ebay. I am really liking the perspective so far.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

groovyturtle.com/blogexternal link
Canon 5D / Sigma 85 / Sigma 50 1.4 / Helios 44-6 / Olympus 24 2.8 MC / SMC Takumar 50 1.4 / SMC Takumar 135 2.5 / Zeiss 135 2.8 C/Y

LOG IN TO REPLY
mcluckie
I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once!
mcluckie's Avatar
Joined Jul 2009
Evanston (Chicago), Beijing
Apr 14, 2011 09:33 |  #12

pratman64 wrote in post #11946053external link
I have become such a fan of Zeiss in the last year or so, that I might actually sell my 24-70L to fund purchase of this one.

Versatility of zoom vs. ZEISS prime.., hmm.

Yeah, I know. I have a 16-35 2.8II and Contax/Zeiss 24-85 and 70-200 2.8II, but I also have the Zeiss 21, 28 (much more fun than the 35), 35 (up for sale, not my FL), 50MP and 100MP. Damn, my bag is heavy, but of course I use different for different days. Oh, and a Rokkor 58 1.2

I need the AF for my street shooting. The 21 ZE is relegated to mostly landscapes, unless I carry it and my longer 2 zooms. I can carry the 21, 24-85 and 100 if I don't need longer.
Or I bring the 16-35 (I must have the only great one in existence), 50MP, and 70-200 -- gives me a macro and fills in the gap. I use the 28ZE and 58 Rokkor 1.2 low light.

Sorry for the discussion. Bottom line is: there's room for both. Except, with 2 bodies, I tend to break a back trying to carry on the big bag in an airplane. But I kinda have 3 kits.


multidisciplinary visual guy | bauhaus alum | traveller and documentarian | seeker of the spark | walker of the dog
all dingus | dslr canon 5DIII, 5DII, 35 IS, 200LII, 16-35L IS, 70-200LII IS zeiss 21, 28, 50/1.4 milvus, 50 MP, 85/1.4 milvus, 100 MP, 24-85N sig 24A, 35A voigtlander 20, 28, 40

LOG IN TO REPLY
p360
Goldmember
p360's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Chandler, Arizona
Apr 14, 2011 10:08 as a reply to mcluckie's post |  #13

^ Your Zeiss kit is pretty much identical to mine: I have 21, 28, 50 MP, and 100 MP. And my 35/1.4 just arrived yesterday.


-- p r a t y u s h -- portfolioexternal link flickrexternal link
Gear List + Marketplace Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
mcluckie
I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once!
mcluckie's Avatar
Joined Jul 2009
Evanston (Chicago), Beijing
Apr 15, 2011 06:56 |  #14

pratman64 wrote in post #12220421external link
^ Your Zeiss kit is pretty much identical to mine: I have 21, 28, 50 MP, and 100 MP. And my 35/1.4 just arrived yesterday.

that's about the only reason I'd keep a 35mm, as a 1.4. but then I'd want the 85, haha, but the ZE is not well-reviewed. Guess I have my 58 1.2 rokkor for a fast lens, but that's off getting cleaned in prep of selling. I had canon 85 and 135; one too short, one too long, hence my first zeiss (100). I used to be a 35/85 guy (and alternating FLs all around those), but now they bore me.

I had a 28ZE before, but gave it up because I couldn't find a companion holy grail fast 50mm. There isn't one. Maybe a guy needs 2 50s -- the 50ZE and maybe the Canon 1.2. Big $$ for a single FL. So I gave up the 28 and the idea of a 50 in favor of the 35ZE.

I'm having a hard time justifying selling the 35 -- it's smack in the middle of my slower Zeiss 24-85. But then my 24-85 seems to go with my travel companion (wife or daughter) and spare 5D body.

I really can't afford both (28 and 35) -- I'd rather justify a 5D3.


multidisciplinary visual guy | bauhaus alum | traveller and documentarian | seeker of the spark | walker of the dog
all dingus | dslr canon 5DIII, 5DII, 35 IS, 200LII, 16-35L IS, 70-200LII IS zeiss 21, 28, 50/1.4 milvus, 50 MP, 85/1.4 milvus, 100 MP, 24-85N sig 24A, 35A voigtlander 20, 28, 40

LOG IN TO REPLY
mcluckie
I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once!
mcluckie's Avatar
Joined Jul 2009
Evanston (Chicago), Beijing
Apr 16, 2011 17:55 |  #15

pratman64 wrote in post #12220421external link
^ Your Zeiss kit is pretty much identical to mine: I have 21, 28, 50 MP, and 100 MP. And my 35/1.4 just arrived yesterday.

Gee, how did you manage to not get the famed 35 f2 (before the 1.4 came out)? It's supposed to be superior to the 28, easier to get the Zeiss look and better from close to infinity than the 28ZE. There are many people here that think the 28ZE is one of the weakest Zeiss primes ever.


multidisciplinary visual guy | bauhaus alum | traveller and documentarian | seeker of the spark | walker of the dog
all dingus | dslr canon 5DIII, 5DII, 35 IS, 200LII, 16-35L IS, 70-200LII IS zeiss 21, 28, 50/1.4 milvus, 50 MP, 85/1.4 milvus, 100 MP, 24-85N sig 24A, 35A voigtlander 20, 28, 40

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

27,653 views & 1 like for this thread
Zeiss Distagon T* 2/28 ZE
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00096 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Safwan Shams
790 guests, 494 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015