Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 15 Oct 2009 (Thursday) 12:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

 
barrett14
Senior Member
792 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth Texas
     
Oct 15, 2009 12:51 |  #1

I am by no means qualified to give you a legitimate review on this lens as I am pretty new to photography. That said, I took a couple of pictures with my new 18-135, and tried to replicate a few of the pictures with the 18-55 IS T1i kit lens for comparison. I will post them side by side with the settings and am eager to hear your opinion.

Picture One:
18-55 lens
ISO - 200
1/250 sec.
F/11
18mm


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Picture Two:
18-135 lens
Settings same as pic 1

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


I didn't realize there is a two picture limit so let me reply with more pictures.

flickr (external link)
500px (external link)
5D Mark III
24-105L, 16-35L II, 70-300L, 8-15L Fisheye, 50mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
barrett14
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
792 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth Texas
     
Oct 15, 2009 12:52 |  #2

ok Picture three

Lens: 18-55
F/11
1/160
ISO 200
length 55mm


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Lens 18-135
Same settings as above

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


flickr (external link)
500px (external link)
5D Mark III
24-105L, 16-35L II, 70-300L, 8-15L Fisheye, 50mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barrett14
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
792 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth Texas
     
Oct 15, 2009 12:57 as a reply to  @ post 8827966 |  #3

18-55mm
F/6.3
1/20
ISO 400
18mm


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


18-135
same as above

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


flickr (external link)
500px (external link)
5D Mark III
24-105L, 16-35L II, 70-300L, 8-15L Fisheye, 50mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barrett14
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
792 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth Texas
     
Oct 15, 2009 12:58 as a reply to  @ barrett14's post |  #4

18-55
F/6.3
ISO 400
1/15 sec
55mm


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


18-135
same

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


flickr (external link)
500px (external link)
5D Mark III
24-105L, 16-35L II, 70-300L, 8-15L Fisheye, 50mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barrett14
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
792 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth Texas
     
Oct 15, 2009 13:00 as a reply to  @ barrett14's post |  #5

And these are all the 18-135. Both of these are at 135mm


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


flickr (external link)
500px (external link)
5D Mark III
24-105L, 16-35L II, 70-300L, 8-15L Fisheye, 50mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barrett14
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
792 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth Texas
     
Oct 15, 2009 13:00 as a reply to  @ barrett14's post |  #6

both of these are also 135mm


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


flickr (external link)
500px (external link)
5D Mark III
24-105L, 16-35L II, 70-300L, 8-15L Fisheye, 50mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barrett14
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
792 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth Texas
     
Oct 15, 2009 13:01 as a reply to  @ barrett14's post |  #7

last one at 135mm


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


flickr (external link)
500px (external link)
5D Mark III
24-105L, 16-35L II, 70-300L, 8-15L Fisheye, 50mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barrett14
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
792 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth Texas
     
Oct 15, 2009 15:24 |  #8

toxic wrote in post #8828835 (external link)
No one can tell much of anything from web-sized images, unless it's a terrible lens.

Bokeh looks promising, though.

here are the full size photos on flickr

http://www.flickr.com …l/sets/72157622​468264487/ (external link)

Also I am going to a hockey game tomorrow so I will post some results from that...

p.s. any tips on how to make sure the ice doesn't turn out gray?


flickr (external link)
500px (external link)
5D Mark III
24-105L, 16-35L II, 70-300L, 8-15L Fisheye, 50mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rubberhead
Goldmember
Avatar
1,899 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: South Carolina's Lowcountry
     
Oct 15, 2009 16:17 |  #9

The colors of the 18-135mm look much richer.


EQUIPMENT: 40D | Rebel XT | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 28-135mm IS | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 - flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,242 posts
Likes: 72
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Oct 15, 2009 16:38 |  #10

So, let's see... The lens just arrived, you fixed yourself a drink and are happily taking photos out the window with it, right? ;)

Looks pretty good. I wonder if the plan is for it to replace the 28-135. Canon has been stuffing those into kits for a couple years now, like they had a huge stockpile somewhere.

Can you please look at the instructions that came with the lens and let us know if it says that IS must be shut off if the lens is used on a tripod? I suspect not, but am curious if it's like the 28-135 in that respect.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII(x2), 7D(x2) & other cameras. 10-22mm, Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS (x2), 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, studio strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link) - EXPOSUREMANAGER (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,242 posts
Likes: 72
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Oct 15, 2009 16:42 |  #11

barrett14 wrote in post #8828907 (external link)
p.s. any tips on how to make sure the ice doesn't turn out gray?

Yes, don't rely on the camera's internal meter at all, or any of the camera's auto exposure modes.

Instead use M mode and a separate incidence meter to set your exposure parameters (both shutter and aperture).

Alternatively, use either Av or Tv and dial in some + exposure compensation. How much will depend upon exactly how much of the white expanse is in each image, i.e. how much it will influence (as in "fool") the camera's internal meter into underexposing everything (not just the ice). Take some test shots. Check the histogram. With snow outside the general rule of thumb is between 1 full stop and 1.66 stops + exposure will usually get you in the ball park. It's a little harder to guesstimate under artificial lighting. I'd start around +1 and see how that works.

An incidence meter is more accurate, faster and easier, IMO.

Depending upon the lights, it might be good to set a custom white balance, too... or shoot RAW and tweak white balance later in post processing.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII(x2), 7D(x2) & other cameras. 10-22mm, Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS (x2), 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, studio strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link) - EXPOSUREMANAGER (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,567 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Oct 15, 2009 16:42 |  #12

barrett14 wrote in post #8828907 (external link)
p.s. any tips on how to make sure the ice doesn't turn out gray?

Set EC to +2/3 would probably do the trick along with manual white balance.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
60D | ELPH 330 | iPhone 5s

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tundraman
Senior Member
Avatar
321 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Northern California
     
Oct 15, 2009 17:00 as a reply to  @ tkbslc's post |  #13

Darn. I was really hoping this lens would have better IQ. Oh well. :(


Canon stuff and lots of it SmugMug Coupon Code: 9Sst64IEj4uzk Save $5 Instantly!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnbachel
Member
204 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Albany, NY area
     
Oct 15, 2009 17:23 |  #14

I think the pictures with your new lens look good. I'm not sure if there is some barrel distortion in the first photo of the skyline, but otherwise, I don't see anything to complain about.

Remember that much of the commentary about lenses on this site involves people looking at huge blow-ups of images (much larger than they would ever print or view pictures). At these large magnifications, the relatively small differences in sharpness betweeh lenses look more important than they are in reality.

Also, other lens characteristics that are more important, such as barrel or pincushion distortion, or chromatic aberration (where different colors fail to focus at the same point), often get less attention than the maximum resolution that a lens can produce when photographing a black and white test chart.

While I don't plan to buy the new 18-135, my impression is that it will work well for those who want a single lens that can cover a large range of focal lengths.


John

_______________

Equipment: 50D, Sigma 17-70 f:2.8-4 OS, Sigma 70-300 OS, Metz Mecablitz 48 AF-1 strobe.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
17,816 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 1605
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Oct 15, 2009 18:08 |  #15

i haven't really seen any sites with reviews on this one yet...but i think the-digital-picture.com should have one soon...they've got it in their ISO chart so you can compare it to other lenses...honestly...do​esn't look good.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=3​&APIComp=0 (external link)


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

149,968 views & 1 like for this thread
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Angester
689 guests, 297 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.