Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
Thread started 16 Oct 2009 (Friday) 12:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

How To Get Blurred Foreground & Background?

 
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Oct 16, 2009 12:59 |  #1

I tried to find a photo online that I could copy & give an example here, but couldn't. I saw a photo of a guy standing astride his bicycle, he was kind of off to the right, and the foreground and background was blurred, but he and the bike were nice and sharp. Does that have to be done in PPing or can it be achieved in camera? If in camera, how is it done? TIA!


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 121
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Oct 16, 2009 13:01 |  #2

Learn to control your Depth of Field (external link)


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stsva
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,360 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 284
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Oct 16, 2009 14:01 |  #3

Take a look at this online depth of field calculator: http://www.dofmaster.c​om/dofjs.html (external link)


Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
http://www.pbase.com/s​tsva/profile (external link)
Member of the GIYF
Club and
HAMSTTR
٩ Breeders Club http://photography-on-the.net …=744235&highlig​ht=hamsttr Join today!
Image Editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tedder
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Jan 2009
     
Oct 16, 2009 14:51 |  #4



chellyroo:

That would have been done in the camera, not in post-processing (although the effect can be enhanced in post-processing).

Here's an illustration—a yardstick shot at f2.8: http://www.have-camera-will-travel.com/_Media/30d_​3105-2.jpeg (external link)

Picture the bicycle and rider in the photo you mention being at the 20" mark in this illustration.

Large apertures such as f2.8 will render shallow depth of field. With a smaller aperture, such as f5.6, more of the yardstick would be in focus.

The yardstick example makes a good try-it-yourself project for experimenting with depth of field, by the way.

—Tedder


Tedder Stephenson's Flickr Photostream (external link).
Albums:
Various Items (external link), Mineral Matters (external link)
, The Bench (external link), Shadows of Turning (external link), Circles of Confusion (external link), A Line From Elwood (external link), Waterous Disturbulations (external link), and Exes Whys Vees (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chopperdave
Goldmember
Avatar
1,195 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Sep 2008
     
Oct 16, 2009 14:52 |  #5

maybe it was a shot taken with a tilt and shift lens?

http://kellymoorephoto​graphy.com/mooreblog/?​p=2327 (external link)


David
davidmoorephoto.com (external link)
racecarshots.com (external link)
I feel like I've gone back in time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaggymatt
Senior Member
555 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: South Central, PA
     
Oct 16, 2009 14:56 |  #6

chopperdave wrote in post #8835629 (external link)
maybe it was a shot taken with a tilt and shift lens?

http://kellymoorephoto​graphy.com/mooreblog/?​p=2327 (external link)

That was my thought, or a lensbaby. Without seeing the pic it is hard to tell.


Pelican 1614
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Oct 16, 2009 15:09 |  #7

shaggymatt wrote in post #8835656 (external link)
That was my thought, or a lensbaby. Without seeing the pic it is hard to tell.

Photo can be seen at
http://www.davidellisp​hoto.com/ (external link) in collection 1. I understand how to use a large aperture for blurred background and small one for sharp one, what i can't understand with this photo's style is how the subject off to the right is clear but foreground and background all around him is blurred.


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 121
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Oct 16, 2009 15:13 |  #8

Looks in focus across the entire image at the same plane as the subject so I'd say it was just shot wide open with an f/1.2 lens probably.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CosmoKid
Goldmember
Avatar
4,235 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2009
Location: NJ
     
Oct 16, 2009 15:37 |  #9

Tedder wrote in post #8835623 (external link)



chellyroo:

That would have been done in the camera, not in post-processing (although the effect can be enhanced in post-processing).

Here's an illustration—a yardstick shot at f2.8: http://www.have-camera-will-travel.com/_Media/30d_​3105-2.jpeg (external link)

Picture the bicycle and rider in the photo you mention being at the 20" mark in this illustration.

Large apertures such as f2.8 will render shallow depth of field. With a smaller aperture, such as f5.6, more of the yardstick would be in focus.

The yardstick example makes a good try-it-yourself project for experimenting with depth of field, by the way.

—Tedder


please go back to the default font settings. this is terrible. i didn't read it and i am sure a lot of people dont bother reading it.


Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
iRocktheShot.com (external link) - Portfolio (external link)

Gear/Feedback
Facebook "Fan" Page (external link) -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,346 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 456
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Oct 16, 2009 15:42 |  #10

The linked shot is simply a fast aperture, nothing trickier than that.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,473 posts
Likes: 152
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 16, 2009 16:10 |  #11

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #8835746 (external link)
Looks in focus across the entire image at the same plane as the subject so I'd say it was just shot wide open with an f/1.2 lens probably.

JeffreyG wrote in post #8835899 (external link)
The linked shot is simply a fast aperture, nothing trickier than that.

I agree with both of the above 100%.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,473 posts
Likes: 152
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 16, 2009 16:11 |  #12

Tedder wrote in post #8835623 (external link)



chellyroo:

That would have been done in the camera, not in post-processing (although the effect can be enhanced in post-processing).

Here's an illustration—a yardstick shot at f2.8: http://www.have-camera-will-travel.com/_Media/30d_​3105-2.jpeg (external link)

Picture the bicycle and rider in the photo you mention being at the 20" mark in this illustration.

Large apertures such as f2.8 will render shallow depth of field. With a smaller aperture, such as f5.6, more of the yardstick would be in focus.

The yardstick example makes a good try-it-yourself project for experimenting with depth of field, by the way.

—Tedder

CosmoKid wrote in post #8835869 (external link)
please go back to the default font settings. this is terrible. i didn't read it and i am sure a lot of people dont bother reading it.

Me too. Goofy fonts have no place in a forum.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Oct 17, 2009 06:02 |  #13

SkipD wrote in post #8836036 (external link)
I agree with both of the above 100%.

That's what I was looking for. Thank you all!


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,073 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 117
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Oct 17, 2009 06:29 |  #14

To the OP, please do not use all caps in any Titles here in the forum. I have changed your title. All caps means you are yelling or are extremely upset. I doubt you were either.

As for what you are asking, if you have a large aperture lens, this effect is quite easy to do, especially if you zoom into the subject. And you can set your camera to any of the multiple focus points so you can decide which part of the frame is in sharp focus and the rest is blurred. You have a 50 1.8, and that lens is wonderful for nice bokeh. Go out and try it at f1.8 and at the different focus points. You'll get that effect.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
5DIV, 7D2, SL1, G12, iPad Pro, iPhone 6P, 5 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Oct 17, 2009 18:26 |  #15

SuzyView wrote in post #8838956 (external link)
To the OP, please do not use all caps in any Titles here in the forum. I have changed your title. All caps means you are yelling or are extremely upset. I doubt you were either.

As for what you are asking, if you have a large aperture lens, this effect is quite easy to do, especially if you zoom into the subject. And you can set your camera to any of the multiple focus points so you can decide which part of the frame is in sharp focus and the rest is blurred. You have a 50 1.8, and that lens is wonderful for nice bokeh. Go out and try it at f1.8 and at the different focus points. You'll get that effect.

Thanks for the advice, especially regarding my 50mm. sorry about the all caps, I've seen lots of them on these boards and didn't think the IM etiquette rule particularly applied here. :oops:


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

16,614 views & 0 likes for this thread
How To Get Blurred Foreground & Background?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is thisisntme
748 guests, 394 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.