Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 17 Oct 2009 (Saturday) 02:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1D Mk III vs 7D please i need advice !!

 
dimidragos
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Ă…lesund, Norway
     
Oct 17, 2009 02:51 |  #1

Im already 5D Mk II owner but i want second camera body. I have opportunity to buy one 1D III use by amateur, in god condition, with only 20 000 exposure with around 1600 eu (2400 usd). I just ask if you think that 7D is a better choice if we think also that in Europe where i live is same money or maybe more expensive. Thanks for your advice!!


5D Mk II, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8 mkII, 24-105 f/4 IS, 70-200 f/4 IS, Canon 50 f/1.4, , Sigma 12-24, Sigma 85 f/1.4, Canon 300 f/4 L IS,580 EX II flash, Feisol tripod with Acratech ballhed
Nimar underwater house for 5D MkII + strobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
Oct 17, 2009 06:44 |  #2

It depends what you want it for. The 7D will give you a shade more reach on long lenses and a little less wide on wide lenses. The 7D will give you more ability to crop or print very large because of it's higher pixel count and will fire flashes remotely. The 1DIII is more weatherproof with a longer expected life. The 1D has built in vertical grip. The 1D has slightly faster frames per second.

Personally, owning a 1D Mk III and having played with a 7D for a while, I would choose the 1D every time but that's purely because it suits what I shoot and the way I shoot it.

They are both stunning cameras with slightly different abilities, choose the one that best fits what you'll do with it.


My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,346 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 456
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Oct 17, 2009 06:45 |  #3

The 1D3 is a significantly better camera, so the decision comes to what you need the second body for and how important the difference in price is to you.

I think a 1D3 and 5D make an excellent pair, each with different strengths.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
9,966 posts
Likes: 405
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Oct 17, 2009 07:09 |  #4

i Have a 1dmk3 and have the 7d on order i want it for birds mostly on the ground ,it will give far more than a shade of reach in fact it will almost double focal lenth for reach .
1DMK3 500f4isL 1.3crop = Field of view 650mm 10mp on subject
7D 500f4isL 1.6crop = field of view 800mm 18mp on subject so if you now crop the 18mp down to 10mp your field of view would be more like 1500mm aprox .
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
datadump
Goldmember
Avatar
1,932 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Oct 17, 2009 07:17 |  #5

GyRob wrote in post #8839035 (external link)
i Have a 1dmk3 and have the 7d on order i want it for birds mostly on the ground ,it will give far more than a shade of reach in fact it will almost double focal lenth for reach .
1DMK3 500f4isL 1.3crop = Field of view 650mm 10mp on subject
7D 500f4isL 1.6crop = field of view 800mm 18mp on subject so if you now crop the 18mp down to 10mp your field of view would be more like 1500mm aprox .
Rob.


i keep getting you and that other guy GbRandy mixed up. i was expecting a 1dm3 trashing post heh heh.. no offense to GbRandy who has had some bad luck;)

anyway


datadump

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
9,966 posts
Likes: 405
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Oct 17, 2009 07:45 |  #6

datadump wrote in post #8839058 (external link)
i keep getting you and that other guy GbRandy mixed up. i was expecting a 1dm3 trashing post heh heh.. no offense to GbRandy who has had some bad luck;)

anyway

lol i have done my share of mk3 bashing but now with all the fixes done im shall we say content with how it works :)
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
Oct 17, 2009 07:49 |  #7

GyRob wrote in post #8839035 (external link)
i Have a 1dmk3 and have the 7d on order i want it for birds mostly on the ground ,it will give far more than a shade of reach in fact it will almost double focal lenth for reach .
1DMK3 500f4isL 1.3crop = Field of view 650mm 10mp on subject
7D 500f4isL 1.6crop = field of view 800mm 18mp on subject so if you now crop the 18mp down to 10mp your field of view would be more like 1500mm aprox .
Rob.

Glad to see someone from my neck of the woods.

I wouldn't include pixel count in a focal length calculation as you then run into problems with resolving ability of the lens as well as depth of field change and noise from cropping the image. In ideal situations you may be able to crop an 18MP image down to 10MP and have an image that's close to the IQ of the 10MP equivalent but mostly, you won't.


My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
romulus_be
Member
56 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Belgium near Brussels
     
Oct 17, 2009 08:06 as a reply to  @ HankScorpio's post |  #8

I own both 1D mark III and 5d mark II. I used to own 40d and 50d and recently tested 7d. I thought one day dat combination of 50d and 5d mark II could replace my 1D mark III. Boy was i wrong.

At that price you definitely should opt for the 1D mark III. Quality of the individual pixels and high iso performance is just phenomenal. Although on paper resolution power of 7d should be better compared to 1D mark III, in reality it wasn't the case.


We all go a little mad sometimes. Haven't you?
http://patrickfranqui.​zenfolio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
9,966 posts
Likes: 405
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Oct 17, 2009 08:13 |  #9

HankScorpio wrote in post #8839162 (external link)
Glad to see someone from my neck of the woods.

I wouldn't include pixel count in a focal length calculation as you then run into problems with resolving ability of the lens as well as depth of field change and noise from cropping the image. In ideal situations you may be able to crop an 18MP image down to 10MP and have an image that's close to the IQ of the 10MP equivalent but mostly, you won't.

yes but i will with my lenses :)
Rob


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,727 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Oct 17, 2009 08:25 |  #10

IQ wise, the difference isn't that dramatic. The MKIII is a touch better in hightower ISO.10fps vs 8fps isn't a big difference.

However the MKIII has much better build, bigger buffer, and the faster AF system.


NYC Wedding Photographer (external link) | Blog (external link) | facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 511
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Oct 17, 2009 08:26 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

If you need to shoot at ISO 1600 in raw and expecting noise free image, go 1dmarkIII.....


Well, once again, my Kinglet shots recently at ISO 1600, on a 1markIII and 500L.

Enjoy... Now, let's see some 7D bird shots.... Maybe at iso 1600? In Raw

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2661/4012621102_9830b0031a_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/vracing/4012621​102/  (external link)


IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3526/4012621234_42e6b66e64_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/vracing/4012621​234/  (external link)


IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3512/4011853521_a555cb67d1_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/vracing/4011853​521/  (external link)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
Oct 17, 2009 08:33 |  #12

GyRob wrote in post #8839241 (external link)
yes but i will with my lenses :)
Rob

Only if you have magic lenses. You'll certainly lose a pleasing looking narrow DOF with lots of cropping at very long focal lengths. Not so bad if you just take record shots but without lots of PP, you won't get anything that's artistically attractive.


My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,727 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Oct 17, 2009 08:33 |  #13

...and once again, The MKIII does not produce noise free images at ISO1600. As for bird shots, why don't you look around? There are plenty, and a lot of BIF ones too, not just perched ones.

Really, I am not sure if you are conveniently overlooking these...


NYC Wedding Photographer (external link) | Blog (external link) | facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
9,966 posts
Likes: 405
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Oct 17, 2009 08:52 |  #14

HankScorpio wrote in post #8839292 (external link)
Only if you have magic lenses. You'll certainly lose a pleasing looking narrow DOF with lots of cropping at very long focal lengths. Not so bad if you just take record shots but without lots of PP, you won't get anything that's artistically attractive.

Well i know what your saying of cause but its not my plan to have to crop to much when i get the 7d .
But i do think that overall haveing more MPs and the 1.6 crop will give that bit more pulling power over the same lens on the mk3.
i use 500f4isL 300f 2.8isL 70/200 f2.8isL 24/105isL 85f1.8 and 50f 1.4 so i dont think i need worrie to much, it might strech my sigma 150/500 hsm os a little though.
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dimidragos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Ă…lesund, Norway
     
Oct 17, 2009 14:54 as a reply to  @ GyRob's post |  #15

Thanks to every body. My main reason for this second body is of course the crop factor to multiplay the lens focal. In same time i want to keep same image quality and low noise at high ISO. I`m not so satisfait about build quality and weather seal in 5D and i want one upgrade in this direction. I think my option will be 1DMk III....but i still wait other conclusion :)...


5D Mk II, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8 mkII, 24-105 f/4 IS, 70-200 f/4 IS, Canon 50 f/1.4, , Sigma 12-24, Sigma 85 f/1.4, Canon 300 f/4 L IS,580 EX II flash, Feisol tripod with Acratech ballhed
Nimar underwater house for 5D MkII + strobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

59,021 views & 0 likes for this thread
1D Mk III vs 7D please i need advice !!
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MsDeen
729 guests, 395 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.