LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Canon 50mm vs 28-105 USM

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 02 Dec 2009 (Wednesday) 10:40   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
wjscott
Mostly Lurking
Joined Nov 2009
15 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I have the 50mm 1.8 bu was thinking about upgrading my kit lens for my T1i. I was wondering how sharp the 28-105mm USM lens is compared to a prime? Also is the focusing very fast or does it hunt a little? I am on a tight budget and need to upgrade.

Post #1, Dec 02, 2009 10:40:22




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
toxic
Goldmember
Joined Nov 2008
3,498 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

"Tight budget" and "need to upgrade" typically don't go together...

A zoom is not replacement or upgrade for a prime. One way or another, get an 18-55 IS if you don't have one already.

Post #2, Dec 02, 2009 10:46:54




LOG IN TO REPLY
wjscott
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Joined Nov 2009
15 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I already have the 18-55 IS. I know that the zoom is not a replacement for the prime. I was just wondering if the 28-105 would be as sharp as the prime. Also is the 28-135 USM with IS worth the extra money compared to the 28-105 USM?

Post #3, Dec 02, 2009 10:50:16




LOG IN TO REPLY
TSY87
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2009
637 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

keep the 18-55. the 28-135 isnt wide enough. I had it, didnt really care for it.

you would be better off keeping the kit and getting the 55-250 if you wanted more reach.

Post #4, Dec 02, 2009 10:58:37


D700 Gripped, Nikkor 20 2.8D, Sigma 50 1.4, Rokinon 85 1.4, Nikkor 105 2.8 Micro VR, Nikkor 70-200 2.8 VR2, SB-900
Myflickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
wjscott
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Joined Nov 2009
15 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

i really dont want more reach, I just need a little more then 55mm. So you guys dont think it is worth it to get the 28-105 for a good travel and walk around lens?

Post #5, Dec 02, 2009 11:01:06




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
algold
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2006
521 posts
Israel
[MORE/SHARE]

28-105 f/3.5-4.5 USM is a nice little lens and the price is good. It's not wide on a crop camera, but gives you a very useful range for candid 'togging. It's light and small, has decent build quality, AF is very fast and precise (a lot better than 50 f/1.8). It's not as sharp as a prime, especially at the longer end. Min focus distance is quite good, bokeh is very good for a lens in this price range. I used it as a walk-around lens for about 2 years and was quite happy with it. Loaned it to a friend who uses it on 10D and he is very happy with the results as well. If you don't want/need a longer reach, it's a good choice for about $200 new, find a good used one and it will be even more attractive.
Taken with a 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 MkII USM:

IMAGE: http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d125/algold9/Family/IMG_1074_1.jpg

Don't get a plasticky 28-105 f/4-5.6 by mistake, it's not good at all :(

Post #6, Dec 02, 2009 13:36:42


G1X, 100D, 40D, 10-18 IS STM, 17-85 IS, Sigma 30/1.4, 40/2.8 STM, 60/2.8 macro, MP-E 65/2.8, 85/1.8, 70-200/4 L, 270EX, 430EX, MR-14ex, Metz 58 AF-1
EOS-M 22/2, 18-55 is stm

LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
crn3371's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
7,198 posts
SoCal, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I wouldn't find 28mm to be wide enough for a walkabout lens. Your 18-55 IS is a fairly decent lens and the 55-250 IS is the perfect complement to it. If you want a one lens solution then perhaps the 15-85 IS or even the 18-135 IS might be something to consider.

Post #7, Dec 02, 2009 13:46:05




LOG IN TO REPLY
Player9
Senior Member
Joined Mar 2007
658 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

The 50mm prime is much sharper than the 28-105mm f/3.4-4.5 is at 50mm. The difference will be huge at f/4, but will start to become less noticeable at f/8.

The 28-105mm lens is a great lens for the price, but it's not as good as the 18-55mm IS lens.

Post #8, Dec 02, 2009 13:55:17 as a reply to crn3371's post 9 minutes earlier.


60D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, EF-S 18-135mm 3.5-5.6 IS, EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, EF 28mm f/1.8, EF 50mm f/1.8, EF-S 60mm f/2.8 macro, EF 85mm f/1.8, 430ex, 220ex, Alien Bee B400 (2), Alien Bee B800 (2)

LOG IN TO REPLY
MegaPutzel
Junior Member
MegaPutzel's Avatar
Joined Sep 2004
22 posts
Vancouver, BC
[MORE/SHARE]

Keep the 18-55..

Yes the 28-105mm (the right one!) is a decent lens for the price. You might also want to consider the 24-85mm lens that can be had cheap also. This is a bit wider on a crop so it may interest you. Neither of these lenses would be sharper than the 50mm 1.8

IF you're looking to spend $100-$150.

Really your best option would be the 55-250mm. It goes nicely with your kit lens and prime set up.

Post #9, Dec 02, 2009 14:34:07


T1i DSLR , 17-40 f/4L , 18-55 IS , 50 f/1.8, 24-85 , 55-250 IS , 70-200 f/4L

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,549 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon 50mm vs 28-105 USM
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.0008 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1126 guests, 804 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Maikuuni

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.