Canon Digital Photography Forums  

P.O.T.N. SUPPORT SHOP IS OPEN, check it out now!

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Photo Sharing' section > Sports
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #1
TiKTaC
Member
 
TiKTaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gilmer, Texas
Posts: 326
Default :( Could have been!

Could have been one of the all time greatest shots I have ever had. My local school won this game to advance them to the State Championship next weekend. Our QB rushed for 149 yards and 5 touchdowns. You will see this kid at the next level. Has several schools looking but not committed yet. I was sick when I downloaded these this morning. Probably my error but I sure have had focus issues with this new 50D.

I haven't touched these yet so I will try to salvage a little just to give to him for memories.



__________________
My Gear:Canon 1D MarkIII, Canon 70-200 F2.8 L

Last edited by TiKTaC : 6th of December 2009 (Sun) at 11:55.
TiKTaC is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #2
SPORTshot
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 440
Default Re: :( Could have been!

Would have been some sweet shots, that's for sure ! I have a 50d and am not happy with it's performance......very inconsistant in my opinion. I'm hoping the 7D does indeed handle AF better than the 50d as well as better high ISO performance.
__________________
James
Gear: D3s,70-200vrII
SPORTshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #3
lespaulowner
Member
 
lespaulowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dededo, Guam
Posts: 810
Default Re: :( Could have been!

ouch
__________________
Antonio
I'm a level 14 photographer who can't defeat the Paintball Gym leader known as Gary Baum until I get the 300mm 2.8L IS II USM stone.
flickr
lespaulowner is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #4
ogre1231
Senior Member
 
ogre1231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,130
Default Re: :( Could have been!

bummer!
__________________
1D MK IV, 1D MKII, 17-40 f4.0L, 50 f1.4, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f2.8L IS, 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS, 580EX II, 430 EX, G10 w/ Ikelite housing and DS-51 Strobe, S90
ogre1231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #5
RonnieA
Member
 
RonnieA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 968
Default Re: :( Could have been!

happens to the best of them
__________________
MkII x 2 | Rebel XT | EF-S 18-55mm 3.5-5.6 | 17-40mm 4 L | 50mm 1.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 70-200mm 2.8L | 300 2.8L IS | 1.4x & 2x TCs | Lowepro Slingshot 300 AW | 580ex II
Four Seam Images

RonnieA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #6
ironbelle
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 646
Default Re: :( Could have been!

I would suggest a higher shutter speed other than 1/250th to freeze the action. You have fast glass from the looks of your signature. I would have opened up wide, started at 1/500th and adjusted the ISO accordingly before using flash. I say this not knowing the quality of the field lights. Since you have fast glass, you probably could have used a bit more ISO and gotten something usable (even if you had to run it through a noiseware software).
__________________
My Blog
Flickr
ironbelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #7
philwillmedia
Goldmember
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sittin on the beach, drinking rocket fuels - Oh yeah
Posts: 4,836
Default Re: :( Could have been!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ironbelle View Post
I would suggest a higher shutter speed other than 1/250th to freeze the action. You have fast glass from the looks of your signature. I would have opened up wide, started at 1/500th and adjusted the ISO accordingly before using flash. I say this not knowing the quality of the field lights. Since you have fast glass, you probably could have used a bit more ISO and gotten something usable (even if you had to run it through a noiseware software).
I agree. Having your shutter speed set too slow is the problem, not Auto Focus.
At 1/250sec you have two factors working against you - the movement of the the action and also the possibility of camera shake as you move to follow the action. IS won't compensate for either of these issues.

Also are you on single shot or AI Servo?
If you're on single shot, then that's part of your problem. You need to be on AI Servo to track and maintain your focus lock.

Edit:...and dont worry, we've all done it. Have a look at this thread http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=773658
__________________
Regards, Phil
2011/12 CAMS Gold Accredited Photographer | 2010 & 2011 V8 Supercars Aust. Accredited Photographer | 2008, '09, '10 South Aus. Rally Photographer of the Year | Catch Fence Photos - 2009 Photo of the Year
"A bad day at the race track is better than a good day in the office" | www.freewebs.com/philwillmedia

Last edited by philwillmedia : 6th of December 2009 (Sun) at 16:42.
philwillmedia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #8
JDCPA
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 81
Default Re: :( Could have been!

I have had good results with a 50D, but not perfect. Better with the 7D.

I assume you used center point focus.

I agree with the shutter speed comment. I find a minimum of 1/320 is the lowest you can go.

Good shots, you almost got it.
JDCPA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #9
ironbelle
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 646
Default Re: :( Could have been!

I shoot boxing so I use AI Servo. You may want to try using a monopod if you don't think your steady enough to hand hold a 70-200. So, AI Servo, higher shutter speed and a monopod would be a good start the next time you go out and see if that improves your keep rate.
__________________
My Blog
Flickr
ironbelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #10
butcha27
Senior Member
 
butcha27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,336
Default Re: :( Could have been!

Pump that ISO up around 1600 and you'll get a much better shutter speed, it won't be too noisy and you'll be getting a much better speed for sport. Some good advice from those who have alrewady commented too
__________________
Rob
www.robshots.com.au
My Gear
butcha27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #11
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
 
JeffreyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 13,486
Default Re: :( Could have been!

The guys are right that you need a faster shutter speed. Kick that thing to ISO 1600 and you are at 1/400.

But looking at the second image, I think focus was also missed. #71 in the background looks pretty sharp.
__________________
My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/
Commercial sports:http://girbach.zenfolio.com/
I use a Canon 5D and 1DIV and a Panasonic GF-1 Gear List: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...postcount=1550
JeffreyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #12
DHMN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cloquet Minnesota
Posts: 1,206
Default Re: :( Could have been!

I think people are missing..that he couldn't go faster.. he used a flash so he couldn't go up to 1/400 etc. It does seem more like focus wasn't set to 'center spot' because of the lack of backgound "blur" at f2.8.and only 90mm
__________________
EOS 7D Sigma 70-200 F2.8 (1.4 extender outdoors) are the workhorses. 50D for backup, EF 70-300MM USM f/4-5.6 IS, Freelance photographer for local newspapers and my website viewthroughmylens.net

Last edited by DHMN : 6th of December 2009 (Sun) at 18:31.
DHMN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #13
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
 
JeffreyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 13,486
Default Re: :( Could have been!

Quote:
Originally Posted by DHMN View Post
I think people are missing..that he couldn't go faster.. he used a flash so he couldn't go up to 1/400 etc. It does seem more like focus wasn't set to 'center spot'

Ah, when I looked at the second shot the distant player appears so close in exposure to the near players I assumed that this shot was ambient. Even the crowd is not too dark.

So another problem the OP has is that his settings with flash are way too close to ambient. He needs to underexpose ambient a lot more (stop down, lower ISO) so that the flash has a chance to freeze motion.

Flash with sports is an either or thing. Either you go ambient and pick a high shutter speed to stop motion or you need to get rid of ambient altogether so the flash will freeze the action. In between is a blurry mess.
__________________
My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/
Commercial sports:http://girbach.zenfolio.com/
I use a Canon 5D and 1DIV and a Panasonic GF-1 Gear List: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...postcount=1550

Last edited by JeffreyG : 6th of December 2009 (Sun) at 18:32.
JeffreyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #14
ironbelle
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 646
Default Re: :( Could have been!

That's why I mentioned in my first post that he should have tried a faster shutterspeed and higher ISO in addtion to his fast glass BEFORE using flash. I figured the camera sync rate was 1/250 and that is why he was at that shutter speed(to be able to use flash).

Quote:
Originally Posted by DHMN View Post
I think people are missing..that he couldn't go faster.. he used a flash so he couldn't go up to 1/400 etc. It does seem more like focus wasn't set to 'center spot' because of the lack of backgound "blur" at f2.8.and only 90mm
__________________
My Blog
Flickr
ironbelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of December 2009 (Sun)   #15
skygod44
"in stockings and suspenders"
 
skygod44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan. Which means nowhere near Tokyo!
Posts: 6,023
Default Re: :( Could have been!

Oh no!
I feel so sorry you missed the shots, but as has been said up there ^^^^^ we've all done it, and you need to learn from your mistakes.

Here's my tuppence worth -

You've got two camera bodies, yes? Which one had which lens on? If I were in your shoes, I'd have the 85 f1.8 on one body and the 70-200 (set nearer the 200mm end) on the other. And I certainly wouldn't hope that flash would be of any benefit outdoors with high speed action.

With this set-up, you might have been luckier and been able to get the shots with the 85mm, because the EXIF data on your shots shows that you were at 90mm when you took the shots, and ISO was only 640 (equiv.) at f2.8.

ISO 1000+ at f1.8 would have lifted the shutter speed plenty, and you can always clean up noise (if it's not too bad) in PP, but you can't do much about motion blur.

Try, try, try again, and if you've two bodies, use 'em!!!
__________________
"Whatever you do, enjoy yourself...otherwise, what's the point."
6D/7D, EF-S10-22, EF100 macro/24-105/70-200/100-400. Siggy 30/17-50/85. Some 'pods, Intuos 4, LR4. I♥GIMP! Semi-pro concert/PR photographer. ~Simon~
skygod44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.