![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
Could have been one of the all time greatest shots I have ever had. My local school won this game to advance them to the State Championship next weekend. Our QB rushed for 149 yards and 5 touchdowns. You will see this kid at the next level. Has several schools looking but not committed yet. I was sick when I downloaded these this morning. Probably my error but I sure have had focus issues with this new 50D.
I haven't touched these yet so I will try to salvage a little just to give to him for memories. ![]() ![]()
__________________
My Gear:Canon 1D MarkIII, Canon 70-200 F2.8 L Last edited by TiKTaC : 6th of December 2009 (Sun) at 11:55. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
Would have been some sweet shots, that's for sure ! I have a 50d and am not happy with it's performance......very inconsistant in my opinion. I'm hoping the 7D does indeed handle AF better than the 50d as well as better high ISO performance.
__________________
James Gear: D3s,70-200vrII |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
ouch
__________________
Antonio I'm a level 14 photographer who can't defeat the Paintball Gym leader known as Gary Baum until I get the 300mm 2.8L IS II USM stone. flickr |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
|
bummer!
__________________
1D MK IV, 1D MKII, 17-40 f4.0L, 50 f1.4, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f2.8L IS, 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS, 580EX II, 430 EX, G10 w/ Ikelite housing and DS-51 Strobe, S90 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
happens to the best of them
__________________
MkII x 2 | Rebel XT | EF-S 18-55mm 3.5-5.6 | 17-40mm 4 L | 50mm 1.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 70-200mm 2.8L | 300 2.8L IS | 1.4x & 2x TCs | Lowepro Slingshot 300 AW | 580ex II Four Seam Images |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
|
I would suggest a higher shutter speed other than 1/250th to freeze the action. You have fast glass from the looks of your signature. I would have opened up wide, started at 1/500th and adjusted the ISO accordingly before using flash. I say this not knowing the quality of the field lights. Since you have fast glass, you probably could have used a bit more ISO and gotten something usable (even if you had to run it through a noiseware software).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sittin on the beach, drinking rocket fuels - Oh yeah
Posts: 4,836
|
Quote:
At 1/250sec you have two factors working against you - the movement of the the action and also the possibility of camera shake as you move to follow the action. IS won't compensate for either of these issues. Also are you on single shot or AI Servo? If you're on single shot, then that's part of your problem. You need to be on AI Servo to track and maintain your focus lock. Edit:...and dont worry, we've all done it. Have a look at this thread http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=773658
__________________
Regards, Phil 2011/12 CAMS Gold Accredited Photographer | 2010 & 2011 V8 Supercars Aust. Accredited Photographer | 2008, '09, '10 South Aus. Rally Photographer of the Year | Catch Fence Photos - 2009 Photo of the Year "A bad day at the race track is better than a good day in the office" | www.freewebs.com/philwillmedia Last edited by philwillmedia : 6th of December 2009 (Sun) at 16:42. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 81
|
I have had good results with a 50D, but not perfect. Better with the 7D.
I assume you used center point focus. I agree with the shutter speed comment. I find a minimum of 1/320 is the lowest you can go. Good shots, you almost got it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
|
I shoot boxing so I use AI Servo. You may want to try using a monopod if you don't think your steady enough to hand hold a 70-200. So, AI Servo, higher shutter speed and a monopod would be a good start the next time you go out and see if that improves your keep rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
|
Pump that ISO up around 1600 and you'll get a much better shutter speed, it won't be too noisy and you'll be getting a much better speed for sport. Some good advice from those who have alrewady commented too
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 13,486
|
The guys are right that you need a faster shutter speed. Kick that thing to ISO 1600 and you are at 1/400.
But looking at the second image, I think focus was also missed. #71 in the background looks pretty sharp.
__________________
My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/ Commercial sports:http://girbach.zenfolio.com/ I use a Canon 5D and 1DIV and a Panasonic GF-1 Gear List: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...postcount=1550 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cloquet Minnesota
Posts: 1,206
|
I think people are missing..that he couldn't go faster.. he used a flash so he couldn't go up to 1/400 etc. It does seem more like focus wasn't set to 'center spot' because of the lack of backgound "blur" at f2.8.and only 90mm
__________________
EOS 7D Sigma 70-200 F2.8 (1.4 extender outdoors) are the workhorses. 50D for backup, EF 70-300MM USM f/4-5.6 IS, Freelance photographer for local newspapers and my website viewthroughmylens.net Last edited by DHMN : 6th of December 2009 (Sun) at 18:31. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 13,486
|
Quote:
Ah, when I looked at the second shot the distant player appears so close in exposure to the near players I assumed that this shot was ambient. Even the crowd is not too dark. So another problem the OP has is that his settings with flash are way too close to ambient. He needs to underexpose ambient a lot more (stop down, lower ISO) so that the flash has a chance to freeze motion. Flash with sports is an either or thing. Either you go ambient and pick a high shutter speed to stop motion or you need to get rid of ambient altogether so the flash will freeze the action. In between is a blurry mess.
__________________
My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/ Commercial sports:http://girbach.zenfolio.com/ I use a Canon 5D and 1DIV and a Panasonic GF-1 Gear List: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...postcount=1550 Last edited by JeffreyG : 6th of December 2009 (Sun) at 18:32. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
|
That's why I mentioned in my first post that he should have tried a faster shutterspeed and higher ISO in addtion to his fast glass BEFORE using flash. I figured the camera sync rate was 1/250 and that is why he was at that shutter speed(to be able to use flash).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
"in stockings and suspenders"
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan. Which means nowhere near Tokyo!
Posts: 6,023
|
Oh no!
I feel so sorry you missed the shots, but as has been said up there ^^^^^ we've all done it, and you need to learn from your mistakes. Here's my tuppence worth - You've got two camera bodies, yes? Which one had which lens on? If I were in your shoes, I'd have the 85 f1.8 on one body and the 70-200 (set nearer the 200mm end) on the other. And I certainly wouldn't hope that flash would be of any benefit outdoors with high speed action. With this set-up, you might have been luckier and been able to get the shots with the 85mm, because the EXIF data on your shots shows that you were at 90mm when you took the shots, and ISO was only 640 (equiv.) at f2.8. ISO 1000+ at f1.8 would have lifted the shutter speed plenty, and you can always clean up noise (if it's not too bad) in PP, but you can't do much about motion blur. Try, try, try again, and if you've two bodies, use 'em!!!
__________________
"Whatever you do, enjoy yourself...otherwise, what's the point." 6D/7D, EF-S10-22, EF100 macro/24-105/70-200/100-400. Siggy 30/17-50/85. Some 'pods, Intuos 4, LR4. I♥GIMP! Semi-pro concert/PR photographer. ~Simon~ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|