Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk
Thread started 07 Dec 2009 (Monday) 15:27
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

shooting a wedding at night

 
enginyr
Senior Member
enginyr's Avatar
962 posts
Joined Feb 2009
San Fernando Valley
Dec 07, 2009 15:27 |  #1

I have shot a bunch of weddings but they are usually all day events and I get some day and night shots. This wedding coming up will be 100% at night but at a gorgeous venue. They seem to think that the lucious flowered grounds of the church will be seen in the pictures since they paid thousands to reserve the spot from 5pm to 7pm. Inside the church is no biggie since I can use flash to light the whole thing up. But outside the church, not so much...

What I was thinking was have and extremely long exposure time and even have the dark night come to life, but that means having them hold EXTREMELY still and I doubt they could even hold that still for that long.

Any tips would be greatly appreciated.


LA Wedding photographerexternal link Stunning Bride Photographers.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
neeko
Miss Film 2015
neeko's Avatar
1,923 posts
Joined Nov 2009
NYC
Dec 07, 2009 15:38 |  #2

When you are talking about long exposure time, are you talking about the outside while no one is walking around?

If so you can tripod it.

If you are talking about low light while people are moving outside, you may want to bring your own lighting and figure out where you want specific shots. Your 24-70L is pretty quick for the dark lighting, but isn't going to be too much help if there isnt light near the peoples faces.


| Gear | Feedback | DAexternal link | NGexternal link | Flickrexternal link | UCPC | Pie |

LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
enginyr's Avatar
962 posts
Joined Feb 2009
San Fernando Valley
Dec 07, 2009 15:55 |  #3

Yes I was speaking of 1-2 second exposures at iso800 @ f 2.8 using flash as well


LA Wedding photographerexternal link Stunning Bride Photographers.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Dennis_Hammer
Senior Member
820 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Connecticut, USA
Dec 07, 2009 16:08 as a reply to enginyr's post |  #4

I say go there before hand and take a few test shots so you can prepare the happy couple for reality. Some people think that black box we carry is a magic box.




LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
enginyr's Avatar
962 posts
Joined Feb 2009
San Fernando Valley
Dec 07, 2009 16:15 |  #5

That's the thing.... The couple is going with the flow and don't have time for it.. They spent tons on the chapel which will pretty much go to waste. They could have spent 1/4 of the money on a chapel Not over looking the ocean which is a shame since we aren't allowed on the grounds till just after sunset. I'm afraid they will be expecting more.


LA Wedding photographerexternal link Stunning Bride Photographers.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert16
I feel like such a square
Robert16's Avatar
2,178 posts
Joined Jun 2007
UK
Dec 07, 2009 16:17 |  #6

The iso could be pushed way up on your 5D II. Your long exposures on all that scenery may work with a very still B+G but I doubt it'll work with groups. Maybe close crops on the groups with flash. Good luck and post the results.


Robert.

gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,848 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Dec 07, 2009 16:20 |  #7

Take some shots at a similar locale with a substitute subject under the same lighting conditions so you will have a sample of what they can expect. Obviously there are limits placed on you by the laws of physics that you cant will yourself out of. I had a similar problem in that a couple reserved an outdoor venue for their fall wedding when the days were longer and during daylight savings time. They were a little shocked when I pointed out their twilight wedding was going to be in the dark. They had time to reschedule.




LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
enginyr's Avatar
962 posts
Joined Feb 2009
San Fernando Valley
Dec 07, 2009 16:21 |  #8

I could push the iso but then they'd be all grainy. Anyone who has any experience to lend would be appreciated. I wouldn't feel like going over 800. 1600 if there was some light but especially with black's the high iso does very bad.


LA Wedding photographerexternal link Stunning Bride Photographers.

LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,469 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Dec 07, 2009 18:27 |  #9

You have a 5DII, shoot ISO6400 F2.0 (ish) and use off camera flash. I've shot ISO 12,800 on the 7D, which isn't as good at high ISO as the 5DII, and the 14" print looks great - a little noisy but great. Tell the customer in advance their choice to have their photos at night means the photos will be grainy, but ok, and if they don't want that they need to take photos at a time where there's more light around.

In 6 years of professional photography only ONE customer has commented on a noisy image. They said "it's a bit grainy", I said "yeah, it is". They didn't bring it up again.

So, respectfully, I suggest you get over your own pixel peeping fears and use your equipment as it was designed to be used! Take a torch so the 5DII auto focus can work though, as well as a speedlite for it's AF bean.


Professional wedding photographer, engineer.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
enginyr's Avatar
962 posts
Joined Feb 2009
San Fernando Valley
Dec 07, 2009 18:31 |  #10

tim wrote in post #9153399external link
You have a 5DII, shoot ISO6400 F2.0 (ish) and use off camera flash. I've shot ISO 12,800 on the 7D, which isn't as good at high ISO as the 5DII, and the 14" print looks great - a little noisy but great. Tell the customer in advance their choice to have their photos at night means the photos will be grainy, but ok, and if they don't want that they need to take photos at a time where there's more light around.

In 6 years of professional photography only ONE customer has commented on a noisy image. They said "it's a bit grainy", I said "yeah, it is". They didn't bring it up again.

So, respectfully, I suggest you get over your own pixel peeping fears and use your equipment as it was designed to be used! Take a torch so the 5DII auto focus can work though, as well as a speedlite for it's AF bean.


Or maybe just shoot iso 1600 and use a tripod for the long exposure (is that even plausible?)

I can use my 50 1.2 and put some distance to make sure everyone is in focus.


LA Wedding photographerexternal link Stunning Bride Photographers.

LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,469 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Dec 07, 2009 18:43 |  #11

enginyr wrote in post #9153417external link
Or maybe just shoot iso 1600 and use a tripod for the long exposure (is that even plausible?)

I can use my 50 1.2 and put some distance to make sure everyone is in focus.

I find 1600 insufficient when it's really dark. Because of the exposure times I don't think it'll work as well. I'd suggest you grab a friend and go try it at the same time of night as the wedding, in similar lighting.

Of course your other option is to use your radio triggered lights - even on low power they'd be plenty. You'd lose the mood though.


Professional wedding photographer, engineer.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
enginyr's Avatar
962 posts
Joined Feb 2009
San Fernando Valley
Dec 07, 2009 18:51 |  #12

Thank's Tim

I have no problem lighting the couple with direct or off camera flash. It's the backgrounds( Ocean, grass, flowers, cliff sides.)

If I expose the background perfectly (long exposure/High iso), I will get poorer quality groom/bride shots.

I shot last night at 1.5 seconds at iso 800 in Ettl at +1 with my 580ex2 and fong thingie and it wasn't the best but doable.

The question is, will the couple be able to stand still for that 1.5 seconds or am I dreaming.

I know I'm dreaming for the group shots.


LA Wedding photographerexternal link Stunning Bride Photographers.

LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,469 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Dec 07, 2009 19:00 |  #13

As long as there's no significant amount of light on the couple they don't have to stand still, the flash will light them in 1/1000th of a second. If there's ambient light on them though they'll be a bit ghosty, with a halo around them.

If you go from that 1.5 sec/ISO800 to ISO6400 you drop to 200ms, ie 1/5th of second. That's MUCH more reasonable. It's really a tradeoff of ISO noise vs blurryness, and to me high ISO noise is a non-issue. I think to get over your fear of high ISO you need to take some photos at 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, and 12,800 and have a few non-photographer friends look them over. Make sure you set up each shot properly, with a nice light balance, don't just change the ISO and shoot it over and over, do it properly.

Also, lose the fong thingy, it's not helpful especially outside. The fong dong is a magic bullet sold to beginners who don't understand light.


Professional wedding photographer, engineer.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
enginyr's Avatar
962 posts
Joined Feb 2009
San Fernando Valley
Dec 07, 2009 19:41 |  #14

Thanks Tim. I will try it tonight. "Grain is my Bain!"

I do find the fong thing to soften the light a bit when I must shoot on-camera-flash.

Do you shoot with a huge flash bracket?


LA Wedding photographerexternal link Stunning Bride Photographers.

LOG IN TO REPLY
SoCal
Hatchling
SoCal's Avatar
5 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Southern California
Dec 07, 2009 19:53 |  #15

I wonder if going grain will work best and use a program like Noise Ninja to bring back the sharpness of the image. It's worked well shooting late night sports.


Life is a Bowl of Cherries, Eat as many as you Can!

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

6,171 views & 0 likes for this thread
shooting a wedding at night
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00133 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is cehanis
810 guests, 597 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016