Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 16 Jun 2005 (Thursday) 12:10
PREV/NEXT

Mini Review - Canon 35/f1.4 L

 
schmoelzel
Lord of the Holy Trinity
1,886 posts
Joined Aug 2001

London (Canada)
MORE INFO

Well, as many of you know I recently purchased this very scarce and hard-to-find-in-stock lens. I have had a few PM's and emails asking me my various opinions of the 35F1.4 L and while I am no pro equipment reviewer, maybe my humble thoughts will be of some interest to someone! :)

First the lens............here's a picture of my 50F1.4 and the 35F1.4 side by side. As you can see, the 35 has more heft and is twice the size. It is also finished in typical L glass fashion; feels solid and weight is just right on my Canon 1D.........

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



Some questions that I have received in the last few days after I posted some of my first shots with this lens:

Is it sharp? In a word, YES! I have a real weakness for sharpness and this lens does not disappoint. The DoF wide open is very narrow especially when you are close to your subject and that is where your focus point is critical. You can really get some crazy DoF effects if you tilt the camera and play around with the plane of focus.

Is it heavy? I find it the perfect weight with my 1D. It is easy to carry around (much easier than my 300 F4!!) but feels very stable. I have read over and over again that those with this lens feel 'inspired' when they have this attached to their camera body.

Is the bokeh nice? I love to isolate the subject from its' background and this lens has that ability in spades. I have noticed in the past couple of days that when I take shots further away from the subject, the background becomes less blurred but the subject seems to 'pop' out of picture. I think this is to do with the incredible contrast that this lens produces. Much the same effect that you get from the 135F2 L.........some refer to it as a '3-D' look.

Is it worth the money over the 35F2 version? Don't know that since I have never used the 35F2. I have read that optically they are very similiar. If so, the 35F2 is a hell of a bargain. I think with this lens what you pay for is the build quality and the better contrast and saturation that you can achieve. I haven't seen many shots taken with the 35F2 version that exhibit the '3-D' pop that this lens produces. I am happy to have spent the money on the lens and I guess that is what counts!!

I could conclude this with a more scientific and thorough set of test pics (brick walls, focus sheets etc etc) but I find that the most practical and informative shots taken with any lens are those that we all would take in everyday settings. Since I take mainly pictures of my daughter Julia, I will post a few more and let you all judge for yourself if this is a good lens or rather worth the $$ that is costs. In my humble opinion, I think it is and I am enjoying it immensely!! Thanks for looking and I hope this helps someone else come to a decision to pursue the purchase of this great piece of Canon glass. If anyone has any questions or statements concerning this lens or my little mini-review, just ask and I will try to answer as best as I can.......remember, I am not a professional review person so take all my observations with a grain of salt!! :D

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Jun 16, 2005 12:10



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
cdhender
Senior Member
cdhender's Avatar
547 posts

Joined Oct 2004

Chicago
MORE INFO

Thanks for the review. Pretty much re-enforced what I've read about this lense: it's sharp, built well and performs well wide open. I have a 17-40 but I still want this lense. Now if I could just find an extra $1100 laying around to buy it.

Jun 16, 2005 12:36

Chris

LOG IN TO REPLY
gramps
Goldmember
gramps's Avatar
1,058 posts

Joined Oct 2004

Mt. WhereinthehellamI? Southen Utah
MORE INFO

WOW!!!!!!!! I think it's time to start saving the pocket change for another "L". Those shots are GREAT!!!!!

Jun 16, 2005 12:43

Some pics here - http://pbase.com/sjhexternal link
20 D; 85 1.8; 24-70 L; 70-200 f4L (sold); 100-400 L; 420 Light bulb
1550 Pelican "soft case" & too much junk!!!

LOG IN TO REPLY
roanjohn
Goldmember
roanjohn's Avatar
3,791 posts

Joined Dec 2003

New York, NY
MORE INFO

.............I'm salivating............​...

slurp slurp!!!

Thanks for the review!!! Truly one of Canon's gem.

Ro1

Jun 16, 2005 12:45



www.pbase.com/roanjohnexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
"What a Tool I am"
drisley's Avatar
8,752 posts

Joined Nov 2002
MORE INFO

Thanks Schmoelzel. Excellent review. And more stunning pictures to boot!
You can definately see the 3D effect, even in #1.
I know what you meant about the lens being inspirational. I feel like I can't take a bad picture when the 135L is on my camera.
Curious, how is the autofocus? I'm sure it's super fast, and accurate, right?
I think when Julia grows up, she will remember dad having a black box for a nose :)

Jun 16, 2005 12:46

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=680947

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
schmoelzel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Lord of the Holy Trinity
1,886 posts
Joined Aug 2001

London (Canada)
MORE INFO

Drisley: AF is blazing fast in good light; little slower but nothing thats bothersome in dim settings. Yeah, AF is spot on......no error from guy with camera allowed!! Julia already thinks that I have one eye.........

Thanks for all the other comments......Ro1, stop salivating and just get out the cheque-book!!

Jun 16, 2005 12:53



LOG IN TO REPLY
ed2day
Senior Member
631 posts
Joined Jan 2005

Boulder, CO
MORE INFO

Wow, great shots. I'm particularly impressed with the color quality and bokeh--highlights seem to be perfect spheres. And of course sharp. I'm also impressed with the sharpness in the pic of the two lenses. Was that taken with your 135?

Jun 16, 2005 13:39



LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Tom W's Avatar
12,743 posts

Joined Feb 2003

Chattanooga, Tennessee
MORE INFO

Great shots, from a great lens. There's a reason that this is considered one of the best wide angle lenses around.

Jun 16, 2005 13:45

Tom
5D III, 70D, & various lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
blinking8s
Goldmember
blinking8s's Avatar
1,618 posts

Joined Jun 2004

w.kentucky
MORE INFO

*sigh* i want one of those too....that sigma 30mm better hold up

Jun 16, 2005 13:48

blinking8s.comexternal link | pixelpost photoblog applicationexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
roanjohn
Goldmember
roanjohn's Avatar
3,791 posts

Joined Dec 2003

New York, NY
MORE INFO

schmoelzel wrote:
Thanks for all the other comments......Ro1, stop salivating and just get out the cheque-book!!

*sigh*...........I wish it was that easy.............:confused:

Ro1

Jun 16, 2005 13:57 as a reply to schmoelzel's post 1 hour earlier.



www.pbase.com/roanjohnexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
schmoelzel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Lord of the Holy Trinity
1,886 posts
Joined Aug 2001

London (Canada)
MORE INFO

ed2day wrote:
Wow, great shots. I'm particularly impressed with the color quality and bokeh--highlights seem to be perfect spheres. And of course sharp. I'm also impressed with the sharpness in the pic of the two lenses. Was that taken with your 135?

The colour is amazing.....the shot of the two lenses was taken with the 100f2.8 Macro, a great lens in it's own right!

Jun 16, 2005 15:41 as a reply to ed2day's post 2 hours earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
eosster
Senior Member
473 posts
Joined Nov 2004
MORE INFO

Man, my wallet is getting thinner and thinner, lol. Awsome images. Enjoy!!!

Jun 16, 2005 19:44

Canon EOS 60D | EF 50mm f/1.4 USM | Canon 430EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
ghocking
Senior Member
965 posts
Joined May 2005

Barrow-in-Furness England
MORE INFO

These shots are not sharp, there are better than that. We need a new word for wow sharp.

Jun 17, 2005 00:01 as a reply to post 605983

Geoff Hocking
G9|20D|40D|50D|5D|7D|1​DMkIIN
60 Macro|50 1.4|100 Macro|17-40 L|24-105 L|100-400 L|Sigma 18-200 OS
270EX|430EXII|580EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
boomerang
Senior Member
boomerang's Avatar
257 posts

Joined Apr 2005
MORE INFO

Schmoelzel- just wondering what your think about the 35 1.4 compared to the 50 1.4
As far as DOF, sharpness, AF....etc.

By the way excellent photos!

Jun 17, 2005 00:44

Francesco
Canon 7D
50mm 1.4 : 50mm 1.8 : 17-40L : 70-200 2.8L IS
vertical grip : mountainsmith

http://francesco.blogp​hotography.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
"What a Tool I am"
drisley's Avatar
8,752 posts

Joined Nov 2002
MORE INFO

ghocking wrote:
These shots are not sharp, there are better than that. We need a new word for wow sharp.

Hmm, yes indeed... let me think.... how about... "scrumtralescent"!

Jun 17, 2005 06:51 as a reply to ghocking's post 6 hours earlier.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=680947

LOG IN TO REPLY

42,143 views & 0 likes for this thread
Mini Review - Canon 35/f1.4 L
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00085 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is kissnoob
1163 guests, 895 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014