Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 06 Jan 2010 (Wednesday) 14:52
PREV/NEXT

canon 100mm macro vs tokina 100mm macro

 
ontopofm
Senior Member
300 posts
Joined Aug 2009

CA
MORE INFO

Hi guys,

Im having a hard time deciding which one to get. Looking at the pictures on flickr Im leaning toward the Tokina. All the pictures are very sharp. Can you guys list some pros and cons of these 2 lenses before fork out $$$ for it. Canon 100mm used with hood for $480 btw. Thanks

Jan 06, 2010 14:52

Phuc
Flickrexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
themadman
Cream of the Crop
themadman's Avatar
18,860 posts

Joined Nov 2009

Northern California
MORE INFO

All the macro lenses (I have heard of) are very sharp and good. (Tokina 100, Canon 100, Sigma 105, Tamron 90). The only real difference I know of is the Canon ones are completely internal focus, but when it comes to macro, that doesn't really matter.

Jan 06, 2010 14:56

Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​comexternal link | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
krb's Avatar
8,818 posts

Joined Jun 2008

Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
MORE INFO

Tokina has a lower price.
Canon has USM focusing and works really great as a very, very sharp 100mm f/2.8 lens.

Jan 06, 2010 14:59

-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickrexternal link
Gear list

LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,562 posts
Joined Nov 2008

Utah, USA
MORE INFO

themadman wrote in post #9338171external link
All the macro lenses are very sharp and good. (Tokina 100, Canon 100, Sigma 105, Tamron 90). The only real difference I know of is the Canon ones are completely internal focus, but when it comes to macro, that doesn't really matter.

I would say it matters MORE. When you only have 3-4 inches of working room and your lens extends 2-3 inches, you risk clearance issues with your subjects - especially if you use a hood or ring light.

Jan 06, 2010 14:59

Taylor
Galleries: Flickrexternal link
60D | ELPH 330 | iPhone 5s

LOG IN TO REPLY
leoni
Member
leoni's Avatar
158 posts

Joined Jun 2008
MORE INFO

i have the tokina 100 mm macro and very glad
maybe the canon has better AF and better optics but price for tokina is correct

my advice: if you will not use the macro often, dont invest to much
a nice macro + a zoom tele will help you more then a better macro lens ( like canon)

Jan 06, 2010 15:04

550d with S10-20 4.5; T17-50 2.8, C50 1.8, C 85 1.8, C 70-200 F4; tokina 100mm macro 2.8; 430 speedlite

like my facebook page: http://www.facebook.co​m/MariusPopaPhotoexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
themadman
Cream of the Crop
themadman's Avatar
18,860 posts

Joined Nov 2009

Northern California
MORE INFO

tkbslc wrote in post #9338202external link
I would say it matters MORE. When you only have 3-4 inches of working room and your lens extends 2-3 inches, you risk clearance issues with your subjects - especially if you use a hood or ring light.

I would like to disagree. When I do macro, I care more about the magnification so my focus is fixed, I move the camera to focus. I am pretty sure most macro photographers do the same. USM, autofocus, all that stuff is wasted on a macro lens. Most folks just set the magnification and move the camera. I also never used a hood, I doubt many macro photographers do as it gets in the way of light. Ring lights are fine (but again, jsut a regular flash thats bracket off of camera works PLENTY well, something specialized like a ring light is wasted IMO), but even at 1:1 on a 100mm lens, you have a good couple of inches.

OP> I'll be honest, I think too many folks are Canon obsessed. Third party lenses are plenty good. Spend some time in the macro section of the forums and you will find this out very quickly.

Here is a link to the macro discussion section: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/forumdis​play.php?f=123

Jan 06, 2010 15:04

Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​comexternal link | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

LOG IN TO REPLY

2,159 views & 0 likes for this thread
canon 100mm macro vs tokina 100mm macro
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00139 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is Ivane
936 guests, 784 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014