Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 06 Jan 2010 (Wednesday) 16:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Best Full Frame lens for landscape and panoramas?

 
clupica
Member
Avatar
32 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Neuchatel, Switzerland
     
Jan 06, 2010 16:08 |  #1

Sorry to need to ask outright but I've tried to find this info on the forum and I get frustrated and go away.

Currently I'm using a Canon 5D Mark II with an Tamron 28-75mm lens to do most of my landscape and panorama work. I'm finding that 28mm is just too narrow for full 360° panoramas. I have an upcoming project that might require me to do as many as 10, 360° panoramas.

I can't make up my mind between all the options out there, such as the Canon 16-35 f/2.8, the 17-40mm, the 20mm prime, the 24mm prime and a ton of other lens from Canon, Sigma, Tamron, ...

The work needs to stand up to professional scrutiny. I also favor a fast lens because it will give me the best flexibility.

I was all set to buy the 16-35mm the other day but a number of pro friends didn't think it has a good price / performance ration.

What say you?

Charlie




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: California
     
Jan 06, 2010 16:29 |  #2

The absolute best is probably a tilt-shift. Otherwise, probably one of the new Zeiss ZE lenses that recently came out (21mm f/2.8 and 18mm f/3.5).

The 16-35 might not have a good price/performance ratio, but that's how all (ultra-)wide lenses are.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,620 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 116
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Jan 06, 2010 16:34 |  #3

I dig my 16-35 II a lot. However, I am clamoring to add the 24 TS II to the arsenal as soon as I can.

I thought about the 17 TS as well, but I think 24 is a better, more used FL for me personally.


Year of Night - 365 Night Project - check it out! (external link)

Follow me into the night.
Unique Night Photography - twilightscapes.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Jan 06, 2010 18:59 as a reply to  @ Todd Lambert's post |  #4

One with little distortion...


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Jan 06, 2010 19:03 |  #5

and (very) good borders.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ckramos
Member
Avatar
179 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Mill Creek, WA
     
Jan 06, 2010 19:08 as a reply to  @ argyle's post |  #6

How about the red-headed-step-child the Canon 20mm f2.8. I mounted one on my 5d2 and I couldn't get the display case to warp; aiming up, down, left, right. I was about half-a-foot away from it.

I had used a nikon 20mm on my fm2 in the early 90s; that had major warpage.

I've used Contax G2s with a 21 Biogon, so I'll blashpheme and say that this is almost comparable to Biogons. No fisheye-ing.

The vignetting can be compensated with the 5d2 built in lens corrector.


5d2 | 580ex ii | 35-70mm f3.5-4.5 | 50mm f1.4 | 17-40mm f4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,346 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 456
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Jan 06, 2010 19:29 |  #7

The absolute best lens for this would be the Canon TS-E 17/4L but it is very, very expensive, especially in Europe. Stepping down in price are the TS-E 24/3.5L II and then the superceded version I.

If you decide the tilt shift lenses are too expensive, another reasonable path might be to look at getting a manual focus only prime lens. Zeiss 21mm for example could be a good choice.

Canon does not have a lot of well regarded primes below 24mm (other than the TS-E lenses) and the zooms are all going to have some distortion that will probably require needless process work to correct before stitching.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tunin
Goldmember
Avatar
1,187 posts
Likes: 4
Joined May 2007
Location: New York, NY - Medjugorje, BiH
     
Jan 14, 2010 13:14 |  #8

In my opinion 16-35II without a doubt for a full frame camera and when it comes to the less expensive lenses that fit on crop sensor cameras I would give my vote to the 11-16 Tokina


I am not young enough to know everything. O.W.
www.medjugorje.net (external link)
*** Amateur tools ***

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
plasticmotif
Goldmember
Avatar
3,174 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Tennessee
     
Jan 14, 2010 13:26 |  #9

14L, Zeiss 21, 17/24 TSE.


Mac P.
My Zenfolio (external link) My Photo Blog (external link) My Equipment
http://photography-on-the.net …p?p=14172975#po​st14172975

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Ng
Goldmember
Avatar
1,206 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2005
Location: Hartsdale, NY
     
Jan 14, 2010 13:31 as a reply to  @ plasticmotif's post |  #10

I agree - tilt-shift for 360 degree landscape work. Unless you have fantastic distortion correct and stitching software, a tilt-shift lens is going to make your post-processing life much easier.


Billy Ng
1 Body
4 Lenses
3 Strobes
Never enough time

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,431 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Jan 14, 2010 13:32 |  #11

The best 360 shots I have seen were done with a lens longer than 28mm. Maybe work on your PP technique? Really wides have issues with borders and keeping lines straight to stitch together. And, yes, T/S using the shift is great.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrianLSU
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jan 14, 2010 13:42 as a reply to  @ plasticmotif's post |  #12

I've been researching the exact same situation.

Here are my findings;

16-35L II Great lens, not as wide as the 14L (obviously) but has a good price/performance ratio. You can mount filters on the front too.

17-40L Good lens, F4 vs. F2.8, has more distortion and dark corners than the 16-35II but is half the price too. 77mm, so it matches the rest of my L lenses for filters.

14L Great prime, minimal distortion, F2.8, just a really good lens. lacks focal flexibility. Very Expensive. Can't mount filters at front.

Now, of the three, if I had to make a decision today, it would be the 16-35LII. But rumor has it there could be a 14-24L coming out in February. I'm waiting to see if it's true before pulling the trigger.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tunin
Goldmember
Avatar
1,187 posts
Likes: 4
Joined May 2007
Location: New York, NY - Medjugorje, BiH
     
Jan 14, 2010 13:45 |  #13

14-24L ?? I have not read/hear about this but if this is true, that is awesome, finally, that was the one thing I envied from the other side...


I am not young enough to know everything. O.W.
www.medjugorje.net (external link)
*** Amateur tools ***

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrianLSU
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jan 14, 2010 14:00 as a reply to  @ tunin's post |  #14

Yea, it was on Canon Rumors in early January. They predict the 70-200 2.8 II (came to fruition), 24-70 2.8 II and a 14-24 2.8.

I agree, would be a great lens, especially since this is one of those we wish we had from the other side.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
advaitin
Goldmember
Avatar
4,620 posts
Gallery: 432 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 829
Joined Jun 2003
Location: The Fun Coast of Florida
     
Jan 14, 2010 14:13 as a reply to  @ BrianLSU's post |  #15

There was a time when I thought I might play with panoramas. As I researched the techniques I saw there were two general looks: a sort of superwide view that covered 360 degrees and distant things were very, very small in the image--which sounds like what you want to do--and general panoramic views of some scenery, which calls for a longer lens--the 45 and 90mm TSE lenses answer that very well.

In your case, wider is better, images are shot vertically and you have to keep out of the picture as you rotate around the tripod, so Canon or Sigma or Tamron 14mm lenses would be the first choice, followed by the Zeiss 18mm. If a zoom will work better for you, then I suggest the Sigma 12-24mm.

You might take a look here:

http://www.cameraquest​.com/inventor.htm (external link)

At the Canon EOS 20/3.5 Color Skopar Aspherical Series II, which may also answer your needs as would the Canon 20mm. And to show how forgetful I am, there is the very fast Sigma 20mm I.8, which I use. I'll check to see what I hve in my files as an example.


Canons to the left, Canons to the right,
We hold our L glass toward the light,
Digitizing in a snap reflective glory
That will forever tell our imaged story.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

12,213 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best Full Frame lens for landscape and panoramas?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is 4bosing
734 guests, 320 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.