Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 15 Jan 2010 (Friday) 14:06
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Best lens for outdoor beach portraits?

 
kelleyphoto
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Jan 15, 2010 14:06 |  #1

I need a lens (or lenses) for outdoor beach portraits (ranging from candids of 1-2 people or up to 15 people for a group shot) with and w/out flash. Most shots taken an hour before sunset.

These are my current lenses:
Canon Kit lens - 28 - 135mm IS 3.5 - 5.6
Canon 50mm f1.8

I'm debating over whether to purchase a Canon 85mm 1.8 lens. I've had good success indoors with the 50mm in low light w/1-2 people in the shot. I really like the high quality that the fixed lens produces. I also don't want to lug around a heavy zoom lens or spend a lot of money since I'm just starting to build my portfolio before I go freelance.

I've used the 28-135mm for some beach portraits, but the quality just doesn't come close to the 50mm. I haven't tried the 50mm yet for beach portraits, but I don't think it's the best option.

Any suggestions, would be most welcome. Thanks!




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Madweasel's Avatar
6,214 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Fareham, UK
Jan 15, 2010 15:00 |  #2

Well it's a bit of a wide requirement and you don't say what format of camera you have, though I would guess from your stated budget limitations you're working with an APS-C sensor. The 85/1.8 would probably do well for the 1-2-person candid requirement, but you'd need something much wider for a 15-person group shot. If you're shooting with flash I would expect your 28-135 to do quite well, as you'd be able to stop it down a bit. For natural light when the sun is going down, you'd probably want to switch to a faster prime (say 28/1.8) or a wider angle, which would probably mean going to f/2.8 for max aperture. A zoom would do the job if you don't mind winding up the ISO a bit.

But really for such a wide requirement, almost any lens could be useful.


Mark.

LOG IN TO REPLY
kelleyphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Jan 15, 2010 15:22 as a reply to Madweasel's post |  #3

Thanks MadWeasel. Sorry I forgot to add I'm using a Canon EOS 40D.

Yes, for the group beach shots, I could use the 28-135 lens w/flash. I have a Canon 480EX speedlite. However, I really like to use natural light if possible. Are you saying that I could take a group shot w/natural light using the 28 1.8 at f2.8?




LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
17,289 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Bay Area, CA
Jan 15, 2010 16:04 |  #4

What's the problem using 50mm for beach portraits? It is not unlike a living room where you tight on space for group shots.


5dmk3, Sigma Art 35mm f1.4, 35L, 85L II, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2

LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Madweasel's Avatar
6,214 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Fareham, UK
Jan 15, 2010 16:05 |  #5

kelleyphoto wrote in post #9400507external link
Are you saying that I could take a group shot w/natural light using the 28 1.8 at f2.8?

That would probably be about right, but what I really meant was that if you wanted wider than 28mm (which is only a normal length on a 40D), then with your budget you're likely to be looking at f/2.8 primes like the 24mm or 20mm. If you can afford the EF-S 17-55/2.8, then you'd have almost everything covered at a good aperture, but that lens is not cheap.


Mark.

LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
22,356 posts
Joined May 2005
silicon valley
Jan 15, 2010 16:07 |  #6

kelleyphoto wrote in post #9400035external link
I need a lens (or lenses) for outdoor beach portraits (ranging from candids of 1-2 people or up to 15 people for a group shot) with and w/out flash. Most shots taken an hour before sunset.

These are my current lenses:
Canon Kit lens - 28 - 135mm IS 3.5 - 5.6
Canon 50mm f1.8

I'm debating over whether to purchase a Canon 85mm 1.8 lens. I've had good success indoors with the 50mm in low light w/1-2 people in the shot. I really like the high quality that the fixed lens produces. I also don't want to lug around a heavy zoom lens or spend a lot of money since I'm just starting to build my portfolio before I go freelance.

I've used the 28-135mm for some beach portraits, but the quality just doesn't come close to the 50mm. I haven't tried the 50mm yet for beach portraits, but I don't think it's the best option.

Any suggestions, would be most welcome. Thanks!

you need a standard length zoom...e.g., 17-50 ... because your requirements are so broad (1-15 people).

an 85mm lens on a crop sensor is more for head shots.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D3, 7d, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L II, 14L II, 15mm FE (sigma), gitzo, markins, benro

LOG IN TO REPLY
crayzie418
Senior Member
crayzie418's Avatar
635 posts
Joined Oct 2008
SoCAL
Jan 15, 2010 16:10 |  #7
banned

Ed covered it, the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 is a great sharp lens that will give you the versatility you seek with the sharpness the 28-135 lacks.


7D - 24-70L 28mm 1.8
LOOKING TO BUY: 70-200 f4L IS
Strobist

LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
17,289 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Bay Area, CA
Jan 15, 2010 21:27 |  #8

I still don't get why one needs something like 17-50 if doing 1-15 people on the beach.


5dmk3, Sigma Art 35mm f1.4, 35L, 85L II, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2

LOG IN TO REPLY
dpark
Senior Member
376 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Jan 15, 2010 21:41 |  #9

kelleyphoto wrote in post #9400507external link
Yes, for the group beach shots, I could use the 28-135 lens w/flash. I have a Canon 480EX speedlite. However, I really like to use natural light if possible. Are you saying that I could take a group shot w/natural light using the 28 1.8 at f2.8?

I'm by no means an expert, but I'm not sure that you'd have enough depth of field at 2.8 for a sizeable group, unless they are all in a perfect line, which probably wouldn't be a very good photo.

According to dofmaster, at 28mm, f/2.8, and the subject 10 feet away, you'll have a depth of field of 4.33 feet. Will everyone be in that range?




LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
bohdank's Avatar
14,060 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Montreal, Canada
Jan 15, 2010 21:59 |  #10

Here is an 85 on a 5DII.

On a crop, a 50 would give you the same perspective. For more intimate shots I would get the 85/1.8... for large groups, a 17-5n would cover all the bases, imo.

IMAGE: http://www.bwkphotography.com/Places/Cuba-II/IMG1860fhdr/712389910_TBpXJ-L.jpg

Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographerexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
In2Photos's Avatar
19,808 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Near Charlotte, NC.
Jan 15, 2010 22:15 |  #11

I like using my 70-200 at the beach. Ti works well for keeping out of the way for candids. But for true portraits it is perhaps a little too long to communicate with your subjects and won't work for group shots very well. For that I would use my Sigma 24-60 or an equivalent.

bobbyz wrote in post #9402501external link
I still don't get why one needs something like 17-50 if doing 1-15 people on the beach.

Then what would you suggest?


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

LOG IN TO REPLY
themadman
Cream of the Crop
themadman's Avatar
18,871 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Northern California
Jan 15, 2010 22:36 |  #12

Nothing wrong with the nifty fifty, you don't really need to buy another lens.


Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​comexternal link | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

LOG IN TO REPLY
bigcountry
Goldmember
bigcountry's Avatar
4,449 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Louisville, KY
Jan 15, 2010 22:42 |  #13

the w/ the x ray switch...


Louisville Kentucky Wedding Photographerexternal link
Travel the World and Photographexternal link
Find me on Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
kja
Cream of the Crop
kja's Avatar
5,921 posts
Joined Jul 2007
40th floor ledge but enjoying the view
Jan 15, 2010 23:47 |  #14

17-55. It's my workhorse and spends a lot of time at the beach :)

If your budget doesn't allow that, I hear very nice things about Tamron's 17-50.


Kristin
Exmouth Western Australia Wedding Photographerexternal link
Ningaloo Reef Underwater Photographerexternal link
MY GEAR LIST

LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
22,356 posts
Joined May 2005
silicon valley
Jan 16, 2010 00:03 |  #15

bobbyz wrote in post #9402501 (external link)
I still don't get why one needs something like 17-50 if doing 1-15 people on the beach.

yeah maybe i shouldn't have used the word "need". you could use a 300mm lens with 1.4 TC if you wanted to.

here's a group of 16 people at the beach. i used an effective focal length of 31mm (1d mark III + 24-70L) and fill flash because of the gloom (it was overcast).

IMAGE: http://erader.zenfolio.com/img/v0/p323508782-4.jpg

ed rader

http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D3, 7d, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L II, 14L II, 15mm FE (sigma), gitzo, markins, benro

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

14,946 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best lens for outdoor beach portraits?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.001 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is cesserap
1287 guests, 664 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016