Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial
Thread started 27 Jan 2010 (Wednesday) 23:00
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

The ultimate Iridium Flare?

 
trailblazer87
Member
83 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Central, CA
Jan 27, 2010 23:00 |  #1

Check this story out, this guy may have beat Karl.


http://news.discovery.​com ...urora-mystery-solved.htmlexternal link




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Jan 27, 2010 23:12 |  #2
banned

Cool! It almost looks like what happens when you have a filter on the lens and there's a nick in it, in the day, but weird that it caused the aurora to do that. I think the satellite argument is kinda cool but doesn't the light form after the electrons from the solar radiation mix with our atmosphere?

I'm betting it's a giant jellyfish . :p


Adventurous Photographer, Writerexternal link & Wedding Photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Adrena1in
Goldmember
1,703 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Winchester, Hampshire, UK.
Jan 28, 2010 03:27 |  #3

I've had "Jellyfish" like that on my pictures before, but I thought the colour of them was down to the type of bright light that causes them. Either way, cool photo.


Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Footbag
Senior Member
391 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Scranton, PA
Jan 29, 2010 10:49 |  #4

I doubt it's a satellite. Even with a 1/200 exposure, it would show some motion blur. Likely a reflection off the interior of the camera.

A quick look at the exposure time could clear the satellite hypotheses up.


Adam
My Astrophoto Galleryexternal link
The Astro Imaging Channelexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,150 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
Texas USA
Jan 29, 2010 10:58 |  #5

I disagree with the story of what they think it is . Follow the link below to the story where Obama is canceling the Moon prodject and scroll down to the small picture on the left side and look at that "Bow Shock" from a rocket and tell me it doesn't look like the same type object in the aurora picture .
http://www.foxnews.com ...sa-constellation-program/external link




LOG IN TO REPLY
Tdragone
Goldmember
Tdragone's Avatar
2,188 posts
Joined Sep 2004
San Diego, California
Jan 30, 2010 00:37 |  #6

Lens Flare of some type?


-Tom Dragonetti
Spyder Holster + 1Dmk IV, 50D, G11
10-22, 16-35 2.8Lii, , 24-70 2.8Lii, 50mm 1.4,
70-200 2.8Lii IS, 100-400L IS
1.4x TC, 580EX ii, ST-E2

LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Nighthound's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
Jan 30, 2010 01:25 |  #7

This very well may be light cast or reflected from a source outside the atmosphere(i.e. a satellite) but it has all the characteristics of a lens flare created by a nearby light source. The wider(full) image shows many possible sources, especially the lights from the closest house at the bottom of the frame. Had this image been taken from a remote location like those Karl images from, I would be much more inclined to believe it was something besides a lens flare.

But then again it might very well be a bow shock caused by a very fast moving cosmic jellyfish. ...it could happen.


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
My Astro Gallery http://s3.photobucket.​com ...7/Nighthd/POTN%20Ga​llery/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Marius ­ B
Senior Member
555 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Toensberg, Norway
Jan 30, 2010 01:41 |  #8

Celestron wrote in post #9497629external link
I disagree with the story of what they think it is . Follow the link below to the story where Obama is canceling the Moon prodject and scroll down to the small picture on the left side and look at that "Bow Shock" from a rocket and tell me it doesn't look like the same type object in the aurora picture .
http://www.foxnews.com ...sa-constellation-program/external link

Actually, there has been some rocket launches from Russia lately, so maybe it could be something like that? Or maybe its a rocket from Andenes?

This is a picture of a light that Norwegian spacesenter believe is a Russian rocket spinning, but Russia denies it...

Google translate:
http://translate.googl​e.com ...rtid%3D596385&sl=no​&tl=enexternal link

Original:
http://www.vg.no ...artikkel.php?artid=​596385external link


www.bottolfsen.comexternal link
Flickrexternal link®
Facebookexternal link

5D MKII, 5D, EF 17-40, EF 24-70, EF 70-200 f2,8 IS, EF 35 f1.4, EF 100 f2.8 IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Deep
Goldmember
Mike Deep's Avatar
Joined Apr 2008
Tampa, FL
Jan 30, 2010 01:45 |  #9

The 'axis' of that object radiates from the nearest porch light perfectly. A search for flare examples from the lens used yields a lot of small, green reflections. This is lens flare. I can't believe they're even talking about this.


www.mikedeep.comexternal link | SportsShooterexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayTuesday
Member
EverydayTuesday's Avatar
99 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Reno, NV
Jan 30, 2010 01:52 |  #10

Lens flare. I've had the exact same thing in some of my astrophotos. It happens when I forget to remove the UV filter from the lens.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/everydaytuesday​/external link
40D

LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,150 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
Texas USA
Jan 30, 2010 11:23 |  #11

If any of you read the story from the link i provided the man that took the image said it was near a rocket base he use to work at :D .




LOG IN TO REPLY
blackhawk
Goldmember
blackhawk's Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2009
East coast for now
Jan 30, 2010 11:29 |  #12

Footbag wrote in post #9497563external link
I doubt it's a satellite. Even with a 1/200 exposure, it would show some motion blur. Likely a reflection off the interior of the camera.

A quick look at the exposure time could clear the satellite hypotheses up.

Doesn't look like one to me either...


You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,150 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
Texas USA
Jan 30, 2010 14:32 |  #13

Here is from another link showing the whole picture but i still will not believe it's a reflection even from a satellite .

http://news.discovery.​com ...rora-satellite-flare.htmlexternal link




LOG IN TO REPLY
blackhawk
Goldmember
blackhawk's Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2009
East coast for now
Jan 30, 2010 14:49 |  #14

Celestron wrote in post #9505316external link
Here is from another link showing the whole picture but i still will not believe it's a reflection even from a satellite .

http://news.discovery.​com ...rora-satellite-flare.htmlexternal link

It's too big, and too much of it is evenly illuminated as if it's surrounded by St Elmo's fire.
Looks like lense flare/back reflection, big surprise.


You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Nighthound's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
Jan 30, 2010 15:48 as a reply to blackhawk's post |  #15

Take a close look at the light shape in question in Ron's link. Note the halo circle seen faintly that the hour glass shape sits inside of.
http://news.discovery.​com ...urora-mystery-solved.htmlexternal link

Now take a look at the flare in the fourth image down on this page (sun bursting above house through foreground tree). Look familiar? Obviously they aren't exact but that stands to reason since this example is flaring from the sun.
http://photo.net/nikon​-camera-forum/00TXNuexternal link


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
My Astro Gallery http://s3.photobucket.​com ...7/Nighthd/POTN%20Ga​llery/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,512 views & 0 likes for this thread
The ultimate Iridium Flare?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00121 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is gtarv
947 guests, 407 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016