Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 11 Feb 2010 (Thursday) 13:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

rob galbraith's review of 1d mark IV autofocus ......

 
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
22,728 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 276
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:01 |  #1

http://www.robgalbrait​h.com …age.asp?cid=7-10048-10484 (external link)

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 35mm ef-s macro, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542, gitzo GM4562, markins Q10, markins Q3, kirk, really right stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:04 |  #2

Oh great - here we go again...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,727 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:06 |  #3

Well, he did uncover the MKIII issues so all we can do is wait and see what the masses think about the AF.


NYC Wedding Photographer (external link) | Blog (external link) | facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:09 |  #4

Yeah, but Nick, there's already a ton of evidence out there that the Mk IV's AF is the dog's bollocks for sport.

Besides, I recall his opinion of the 40D's AF - and he was just plain wrong about that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:11 |  #5

So, anyone agree with him?


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 121
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:14 |  #6

I was wondering when this would come out. I have a friend with a son on the Paradise Valley HS (PV) track team and he was there when RG was doing this round of tests.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J_TULLAR
Goldmember
Avatar
3,010 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:35 |  #7

Interesting read.


Model Mayhem (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:37 |  #8

As a very happy MkIII owner with a 90%+ keeper rate, this is what I think.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
datadump
Goldmember
Avatar
1,932 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:38 |  #9

enjoy!


datadump

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J_TULLAR
Goldmember
Avatar
3,010 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:39 |  #10

Keith R wrote in post #9589808 (external link)
Yeah, but Nick, there's already a ton of evidence out there that the Mk IV's AF is the dog's bollocks for sport.

Besides, I recall his opinion of the 40D's AF - and he was just plain wrong about that.

What was his opinion of the 40D's af? To be honest Im not impressed with it.


Model Mayhem (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:49 |  #11

Honestly, I don't think you can write off RG as just a Nikon fanboy. He gets detailed in his review, and if the 1D4 is off on the shots that he states, then that's a big issue. The issue with the 1D Mark III is no longer about Auto-focus, it's about trust. I really hope that he's wrong, but he shot multiple rounds of the same thing and got consistent results. Can't really be chalked up to "user error" as he knows what he's doing.

Definitely not a good review.


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,727 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:55 |  #12

TaDa wrote in post #9590065 (external link)
Honestly, I don't think you can write off RG as just a Nikon fanboy. He gets detailed in his review, and if the 1D4 is off on the shots that he states, then that's a big issue. The issue with the 1D Mark III is no longer about Auto-focus, it's about trust. I really hope that he's wrong, but he shot multiple rounds of the same thing and got consistent results. Can't really be chalked up to "user error" as he knows what he's doing.

Definitely not a good review.

Yes, but even after the final fix for the MKIII, he did not retract his review. In fact I think he commented that even after the fix, nothing much changed.

I'm sure there are more than a few MKIII users that would beg to differ.

So I wouldn't dismiss him, but given his Nikon alliance, I would take it with a big grain of salt this time around.


NYC Wedding Photographer (external link) | Blog (external link) | facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Feb 11, 2010 14:00 |  #13

Very good point Nick. The main part that worried me was the speed skating review. I'm shooting more and more kids hockey in poorly lit rinks. I've been considering the 1D4 to get that extra stop, but if it doesn't like behaving around ice, that would concern me.

I'd love to hear some more reviews of the 1D4's AF, especially around ice. Enquiring minds want to know!

I will also say that the 1D3's AF system is awesome. I'm amazed at my keeper rate.


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Waldemar ­ Sikorski
Goldmember
Avatar
2,746 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2009
Location: S̶o̶.̶ ̶C̶a̶l̶.̶ Poland (gates of hell).
     
Feb 11, 2010 14:02 as a reply to  @ nicksan's post |  #14

TaDa wrote in post #9590065 (external link)
Honestly, I don't think you can write off RG as just a Nikon fanboy. He gets detailed in his review, and if the 1D4 is off on the shots that he states, then that's a big issue. The issue with the 1D Mark III is no longer about Auto-focus, it's about trust. I really hope that he's wrong, but he shot multiple rounds of the same thing and got consistent results. Can't really be chalked up to "user error" as he knows what he's doing.

Definitely not a good review.

http://www.nytimes.com …th/research/03l​ancet.html (external link)


Val.
http://picasaweb.googl​e.com/sikorskienator (external link)
Picasa albums organized by bird species. (external link)
7D gripped, 40D gripped....100-400L Yes, it's taken with the Sigma 150-500.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
Feb 11, 2010 14:05 |  #15

The problem with this is that for the majority of of users and the majority of bodies, the MkIII has no issues and never did but it was tainted by RG and people saw problems when none existed. There were a few dodgy ones as with everything but it was and is nowhere near the failure that it's claimed to be based on RG's review.

The problem with this current review is that the MkIV really is not as good as the D3 for AF tracking. It's sad but true. However that's like saying a Lamborghini isn't as good as a Ferrari because it's slightly slower to 200mph. Both cameras are more than capable of doing the job and if you can't get the shot you want with a hit rate above 80%, which even a 40D can manage then it really is user error.


My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

58,208 views & 0 likes for this thread
rob galbraith's review of 1d mark IV autofocus ......
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is eyecancu
766 guests, 400 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.