LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


rob galbraith's review of 1d mark IV autofocus ......

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 11 Feb 2010 (Thursday) 13:01   
LIST NEARBY THREADS

 
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
Joined May 2005
22,033 posts
silicon valley
[MORE/SHARE]

http://www.robgalbrait​h.com ...age.asp?cid=7-10048-10484external link

ed rader

Post #1, Feb 11, 2010 13:01:46


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/external link
http://erader.zenfolio​.com/external link
5D3, SL1, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L, 35f2 IS, 24mm f2.8 ef-s, 15mm FE (sigma), 270ex II, gitzo, markins, benro

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2006
2,856 posts
Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
[MORE/SHARE]

Oh great - here we go again...

Post #2, Feb 11, 2010 13:04:01




LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
nicksan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
24,585 posts
NYC
[MORE/SHARE]

Well, he did uncover the MKIII issues so all we can do is wait and see what the masses think about the AF.

Post #3, Feb 11, 2010 13:06:46


NYC Wedding Photographerexternal link | Blogexternal link | facebookexternal link | Flickrexternal link | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2006
2,856 posts
Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
[MORE/SHARE]

Yeah, but Nick, there's already a ton of evidence out there that the Mk IV's AF is the dog's bollocks for sport.

Besides, I recall his opinion of the 40D's AF - and he was just plain wrong about that.

Post #4, Feb 11, 2010 13:09:19




LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Anke's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
30,454 posts
Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

So, anyone agree with him?

Post #5, Feb 11, 2010 13:11:44


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitterexternal link | Tunbridge Wellsexternal link | Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
Joined May 2007
57,560 posts
Probably Chasing Aircraft
[MORE/SHARE]

I was wondering when this would come out. I have a friend with a son on the Paradise Valley HS (PV) track team and he was there when RG was doing this round of tests.

Post #6, Feb 11, 2010 13:14:40


Jay
Crosswind Imagesexternal link
Facebook Fan Pageexternal link

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

LOG IN TO REPLY
J_TULLAR
Goldmember
J_TULLAR's Avatar
Joined Aug 2008
2,979 posts
Isn't that vierd? Yesh!
[MORE/SHARE]

Interesting read.

Post #7, Feb 11, 2010 13:35:43


Model Mayhemexternal link
Blogexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
HankScorpio's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
2,700 posts
England, baby!
[MORE/SHARE]

As a very happy MkIII owner with a 90%+ keeper rate, this is what I think.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Post #8, Feb 11, 2010 13:37:34


My collection of boxes with holesexternal link
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

LOG IN TO REPLY
datadump
Goldmember
datadump's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
1,931 posts
Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

enjoy!

Post #9, Feb 11, 2010 13:38:50


gearhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=898408

LOG IN TO REPLY
J_TULLAR
Goldmember
J_TULLAR's Avatar
Joined Aug 2008
2,979 posts
Isn't that vierd? Yesh!
[MORE/SHARE]

Keith R wrote in post #9589808external link
Yeah, but Nick, there's already a ton of evidence out there that the Mk IV's AF is the dog's bollocks for sport.

Besides, I recall his opinion of the 40D's AF - and he was just plain wrong about that.

What was his opinion of the 40D's af? To be honest Im not impressed with it.

Post #10, Feb 11, 2010 13:39:55


Model Mayhemexternal link
Blogexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
TaDa's Avatar
Joined Feb 2008
6,724 posts
New York
[MORE/SHARE]

Honestly, I don't think you can write off RG as just a Nikon fanboy. He gets detailed in his review, and if the 1D4 is off on the shots that he states, then that's a big issue. The issue with the 1D Mark III is no longer about Auto-focus, it's about trust. I really hope that he's wrong, but he shot multiple rounds of the same thing and got consistent results. Can't really be chalked up to "user error" as he knows what he's doing.

Definitely not a good review.

Post #11, Feb 11, 2010 13:49:26


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
nicksan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
24,585 posts
NYC
[MORE/SHARE]

TaDa wrote in post #9590065external link
Honestly, I don't think you can write off RG as just a Nikon fanboy. He gets detailed in his review, and if the 1D4 is off on the shots that he states, then that's a big issue. The issue with the 1D Mark III is no longer about Auto-focus, it's about trust. I really hope that he's wrong, but he shot multiple rounds of the same thing and got consistent results. Can't really be chalked up to "user error" as he knows what he's doing.

Definitely not a good review.

Yes, but even after the final fix for the MKIII, he did not retract his review. In fact I think he commented that even after the fix, nothing much changed.

I'm sure there are more than a few MKIII users that would beg to differ.

So I wouldn't dismiss him, but given his Nikon alliance, I would take it with a big grain of salt this time around.

Post #12, Feb 11, 2010 13:55:32


NYC Wedding Photographerexternal link | Blogexternal link | facebookexternal link | Flickrexternal link | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
TaDa's Avatar
Joined Feb 2008
6,724 posts
New York
[MORE/SHARE]

Very good point Nick. The main part that worried me was the speed skating review. I'm shooting more and more kids hockey in poorly lit rinks. I've been considering the 1D4 to get that extra stop, but if it doesn't like behaving around ice, that would concern me.

I'd love to hear some more reviews of the 1D4's AF, especially around ice. Enquiring minds want to know!

I will also say that the 1D3's AF system is awesome. I'm amazed at my keeper rate.

Post #13, Feb 11, 2010 14:00:42


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

LOG IN TO REPLY
Waldemar ­ Sikorski
Goldmember
Waldemar Sikorski's Avatar
Joined Apr 2009
2,725 posts
S̶o̶.̶ ̶C̶a̶l̶.̶ Poland (gates of hell).
[MORE/SHARE]

TaDa wrote in post #9590065external link
Honestly, I don't think you can write off RG as just a Nikon fanboy. He gets detailed in his review, and if the 1D4 is off on the shots that he states, then that's a big issue. The issue with the 1D Mark III is no longer about Auto-focus, it's about trust. I really hope that he's wrong, but he shot multiple rounds of the same thing and got consistent results. Can't really be chalked up to "user error" as he knows what he's doing.

Definitely not a good review.

http://www.nytimes.com ...th/research/03lance​t.htmlexternal link

Post #14, Feb 11, 2010 14:02:25 as a reply to nicksan's post 6 minutes earlier.


Val.
http://picasaweb.googl​e.com/sikorskienatorexternal link
Picasa albums organized by bird species.external link
7D gripped, 40D gripped....100-400L Yes, it's taken with the Sigma 150-500.

LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
HankScorpio's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
2,700 posts
England, baby!
[MORE/SHARE]

The problem with this is that for the majority of of users and the majority of bodies, the MkIII has no issues and never did but it was tainted by RG and people saw problems when none existed. There were a few dodgy ones as with everything but it was and is nowhere near the failure that it's claimed to be based on RG's review.

The problem with this current review is that the MkIV really is not as good as the D3 for AF tracking. It's sad but true. However that's like saying a Lamborghini isn't as good as a Ferrari because it's slightly slower to 200mph. Both cameras are more than capable of doing the job and if you can't get the shot you want with a hit rate above 80%, which even a 40D can manage then it really is user error.

Post #15, Feb 11, 2010 14:05:00


My collection of boxes with holesexternal link
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
40,805 views & 0 likes for this thread
rob galbraith's review of 1d mark IV autofocus ......
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.0019 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
989 guests, 742 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is HeatherW

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.