LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


whats the best lens for newborn close-up?

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 13 Feb 2010 (Saturday) 21:43   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
pattrick70
Junior Member
Joined Jan 2010
21 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

what would you all recommend for close ups of feet and toes and all that good stuff. I have a t1i and am using 50 1.4 but am looking for something better for the close shots. thanks for any advice

Post #1, Feb 13, 2010 21:43:51


t1i, 50 1.4 looking for right zoom

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
antitera
Senior Member
antitera's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
119 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

85mm f/1.2 L

Post #2, Feb 13, 2010 21:47:09




LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Goldmember
joedlh's Avatar
Joined Dec 2007
4,593 posts
Long Island, NY, North America, Sol III, Orion Spur of the Milky Way galaxy.
[MORE/SHARE]

What's wrong with your 50? On your t1i, it has the field of view of an 80 on a 35 mm SLR. That's an ideal portrait lens. How close do you really want to go? Any closer and you'll need a macro. But I really don't think you need a macro on baby toes. Just close down the aperture of your 50 a little so you have more depth of field.

Post #3, Feb 13, 2010 21:52:54


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​texternal link
Editing ok

LOG IN TO REPLY
drumsfield
Goldmember
drumsfield's Avatar
Joined Oct 2009
1,508 posts
Bethesda Md
[MORE/SHARE]

What's wrong with the 50mm 1.4?

Post #4, Feb 13, 2010 21:53:10


Canon 5D MkIII | Olympus OM-D | Olympus E-P2 | 16-35L MKII | 24-70L MKII | 70-200L MKII | 85L MKII | EF 50mm 1.4 | EF 100mm 2.8 | 100-400mm L | 20mm 1.7
Feedback and Full gear list
500PXexternal link
D.C. Area Photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
pattrick70
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
Joined Jan 2010
21 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

nothing wrong it works great. I have just seem some other photos of close ups of toes and hands and i dont seem to be able to focus that close.. maybe its just me? this is all pretty new to me

Post #5, Feb 13, 2010 22:03:23


t1i, 50 1.4 looking for right zoom

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
Joined Nov 2008
24,529 posts
Utah, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

joedlh wrote in post #9605132external link
What's wrong with your 50? On your t1i, it has the field of view of an 80 on a 35 mm SLR. That's an ideal portrait lens. How close do you really want to go? Any closer and you'll need a macro. But I really don't think you need a macro on baby toes. Just close down the aperture of your 50 a little so you have more depth of field.

The 50mm f1.4 and f1.8 have a pretty poor max magnification level of .15x (about 1:7). So, no I don't think it is the case that to go any closer you will need a macro. Most of the standard zooms for aps-C (18-55, 17-50, 18-50, etc) have a 1:4-1:3 macro mag, which is roughly double that of the 50mm.

However, you have a lot of room to crop tighter with the newer cameras.

Post #6, Feb 13, 2010 22:03:37


Taylor
Galleries: Flickrexternal link
60D | ELPH 330 | iPhone 5s

LOG IN TO REPLY
KCMO ­ Al
Goldmember
KCMO Al's Avatar
Joined Sep 2006
1,114 posts
Kansas City, MO
[MORE/SHARE]

Cheapest way to get closer is with extension tubes. Newborns are pretty still most of the time, so they'd work quite well.

Post #7, Feb 13, 2010 22:05:52


Film: Leica M-4, Elan 7E, Rolleiflex 2.8f, Pentax 645 -- Digital: Canon Pro-1, EOS 5D Mk III
EOS Lenses: Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX - Canon EF 17-40 f4.0L - Canon EF 24-105 f4.0L - Canon EF 35 f1.4L USM - Canon EF100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS USM - Canon EF100 f2.8 Macro - Other stuff: MR 14EX - 430EX - 580EXII - ST-E2 - TC1.4x - TC-80N3

LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
JeffreyG's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
14,425 posts
Detroit, MI
[MORE/SHARE]

antitera wrote in post #9605109external link
85mm f/1.2 L

Uh, no. MFD on the 85L is not too great.

A cheap option for the OP is the Canon EF 50 1:2.5 Compact Macro. Some other 'close focus' lenses that are not true macro lenses are the EF 135L and the EF 300/4L IS. The latter two are close to $1000 while the former is much more affordable.

Post #8, Feb 13, 2010 22:06:19


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/external link
Commercial sports:http://girbach.zenfoli​o.com/external link
I use a Canon 5DIII and 1DIV and a Panasonic GF-1

LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
xarqi's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
10,435 posts
Aotearoa/New Zealand
[MORE/SHARE]

EF-S 60/2.8 macro

Post #9, Feb 13, 2010 22:12:36




LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
Joined Nov 2008
24,529 posts
Utah, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I don't think you would need a real macro lens. You guys are grossly underestimating the size of a baby. 1:1 is for filling the frame with a ladybug. 1:2 would likely even be to much to fit a baby hand.
The OP's signature says "looking for a good zoom" and I think most of the good standard zooms focus close enough for newborns.

Here's what you can do with just the 18-55 kit lens at 1:3. Not quite 3" in the frame and that's my finger.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

This was with the Tamron 28-75 which can do 1:4 max, and I don't think this was quite at max.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #10, Feb 13, 2010 22:33:33


Taylor
Galleries: Flickrexternal link
60D | ELPH 330 | iPhone 5s

LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
xarqi's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
10,435 posts
Aotearoa/New Zealand
[MORE/SHARE]

tkbslc wrote in post #9605311external link
I don't think you would need a real macro lens. You guys are grossly underestimating the size of a baby. 1:1 is for filling the frame with a ladybug.

:shock:That'd be a one BIG ladybug!

Post #11, Feb 13, 2010 22:37:38




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
Joined Nov 2008
24,529 posts
Utah, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

xarqi wrote in post #9605334external link
:shock:That'd be a one BIG ladybug!

What, you don't have elephant ladybugs in NZ? :)

Okay, got me there. But it would be one TINY baby foot, too. :p

Post #12, Feb 13, 2010 22:39:10


Taylor
Galleries: Flickrexternal link
60D | ELPH 330 | iPhone 5s

LOG IN TO REPLY
nureality
Goldmember
Joined Jan 2008
3,611 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm loving my Rokkor 58/1.2 for everything I try shooting with it. The surprisingly close MFD of about 18" is incredible.

Its not a lens for everyone tho. It takes a LOT of patience.

Maybe consider the Tamron 60mm f/2 1:1 Macro. Its insanely sharp, with just gorgeous bokeh. And at under $500 its a steal for what it is.

Post #13, Feb 13, 2010 22:53:07


Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
Gear List | PBase | external linkflickrexternal link
Lots of Fun, Lots of Laughs, Happy Trigger Finger!

LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
Joined Oct 2007
6,140 posts
Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

Another option to consider would be a closeup filter, such as the 500d.

http://www.flickr.com/​groups/764373@N21/pool​/external link

Post #14, Feb 13, 2010 23:30:41


Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8
Sony NEX 3n, kit lenses and 35mm 1.8 OSS

LOG IN TO REPLY
antitera
Senior Member
antitera's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
119 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

JeffreyG wrote in post #9605195external link
Uh, no. MFD on the 85L is not too great.

With a focal length of 85mm and a 1.6 multiplier, you don't need a "great" MFD. At .95m, the FOV would be about 25 x 17cm. I don't know how small these particular baby feet are or how much of the frame the OP wants to fill with feet, but this FOV would be sufficient in most scenarios. Besides, one can always slap on a few extension tubes to decrease the MFD (A set of extension tubes can be obtained for about $100.)

One thing nice about the 85L is its super shallow DOF. It can create a very dreamy-like effect, which I imagine would be desirable for this type of photograph.

Post #15, Feb 14, 2010 03:30:27




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
4,953 views & 0 likes for this thread
whats the best lens for newborn close-up?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00071 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
747 guests, 511 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Hurlikai

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.