![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
I just finished reading Bryan Peterson's Understanding Exposure and there is a phrase that he uses in a lot of his captions under the photos he has in the book. The phrase is (he is describing what he did to take the photo), "I used an aperture of BLANK and preset the focus via the distance setting on the front of the lens" That last part is what I'm having trouble understanding. What is the distance setting? and how/why do you preset the focus? Any help would be appreciated! TIA!
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 19,542
|
manual focus lenses have a printed scale on them so that if you wanted to focus on something 10ft away you just dialed in the 10ft setting on the scale. Obsolete on autofocus lenses. No need to worry about it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fatal attraction.
|
Understanding Exposure was written many years ago and some things in it are not applicable to some modern cameras. This is one of them.
__________________
Elie / אלי "If you presume to love something, you must love the process of it much more than you love the finished product." John Irving, 5/2012. "In theory there is no difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is." Yogi Berra Site |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
There are actually still times when presetting your focus can help a lot, but you can still autofocus to do it. I often prefocus to a spot on the ground toward which any moving object (usually my son or daughter) i nearing, then there is (hopefully) time to recompose while keeping my focus locked, then shoot when the subject comes into focus.
Also when shooting at night I use my cell phone to create a lighted "focus assist device" use the autofocus, on the lighted screen of the phone, then switch the lens over to manual focus, remove the phone from my shot and shoot away. Many ideas that seem antiquated are still quite useful in digital photography.
__________________
You will find no more zen at the top of a mountain, than the zen that you bring there with you. ~zen proverb~
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 837
|
A number of current lenses still have the distance scales on them but the information they display is rather limited. In general, they show only the focus index (the distance at which the lens is actually focused) and the depth-of-field scale for just one aperture setting (usually f/22). Both still have their uses - albeit the DOF scale more than the focus index - and it's unfortunate the lens manufacturers have, for the most part, deemed them obsolete. However, there are other means of accomplishing the same tasks, as noted by Digital_Zen.
__________________
Dan Some gear, some experience, and no talent. Web: http://www.macdonald-photography.com | http://ambientlight.zenfolio.com | http://danmacdonald.500px.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 6,121
|
Presetting focus is still a very useful procedure especially for landscape photographers.
They can use it to maximise the DOF by the use of hyper focal distances. Unfortunately it is something lens manufacturers have decided to omit so we now have to use DOF calculators
__________________
Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams Keep calm and carry a camera! My Gear |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Apart from the issue that the Distance scale has so few distances marked on them, sp as to make DOF scales useless on modern AF lenses, the other reason the DOF scale is useless in the context of digital SLRs with fixed FL lenses is the fact that they apply only to FF cameras, but not to APS-C cameras!
__________________
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php Last edited by Wilt : 15th of February 2010 (Mon) at 20:09. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,101
|
AF has changed the way we used to work in many ways. Most AF lenses have very short throws, meaning that they focus faster. Back in the old days, precisions focus lenses often took more than one turn of the barrel to focus. I remember the Alpa 50 macro was like 3 turns from infinity to macro range. Some of the less expensive lenses in the Canon line don't even have a distance scale.
__________________
Film: Leica M-4, Elan 7E, Rolleiflex 2.8f, Pentax 645 -- Digital: Canon Pro-1, EOS 5D Mk III EOS Lenses: Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX - Canon EF 17-40 f4.0L - Canon EF 24-105 f4.0L - Canon EF 35 f1.4L USM - Canon EF100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS USM - Canon EF100 f2.8 Macro - Other stuff: MR 14EX - 430EX - 580EXII - ST-E2 - TC1.4x - TC-80N3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
|
I understand now, thank you!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stupid forum lingo that should just die out already | TheHoff | The POTN Lounge | 222 | 2nd of February 2009 (Mon) 22:07 |
| lens lingo | j-paka | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 8 | 10th of July 2008 (Thu) 23:31 |
| Lens 'Lingo' | lamere | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 15 | 25th of April 2008 (Fri) 16:59 |
| Please explain difference in the following Lingo... | Canay | Canon G-series Digital Cameras | 5 | 10th of November 2004 (Wed) 10:17 |
| Need help with a translation-lingere photo | Jmurman | General Photography Talk | 2 | 26th of July 2004 (Mon) 12:56 |