LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


AF Points: High Precision vs. Cross-type in Low Light Question

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 20 Feb 2010 (Saturday) 11:57   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
DarthMTS47
Senior Member
DarthMTS47's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
542 posts
Cleveland, Ohio
[MORE/SHARE]

I've searched the forums and Canon's white papers, but I don't have a good answer to my question concerning the current generation of cameras and their ability to AF in low light conditions. Let me see if I have this correct (assuming camera is set to One Shot mode):

Canon 7D - 19 AF points. Cross-type sensitive to f/5.6 (vertical and horizontal f/5.6 sensors). High-precision f/2.8 sensor center AF point.

Canon 5D Mark II - 9 AF points. Horizontal f/5.6 sensors. High-precision f/2.8 sensor center AF point.

Canon 1D Mark IV
- 45 AF points. 39 cross-type sensitive to f/5.6 horizontally and sensitive to f/2.8 vertically. 6 horizontal f/5.6 sensors. High-precision f/4 horizontally and f/8 vertically center AF point.


That being said, what kind of AF point is most sensitve in low light conditions, assuming you're using a f/2.8 or faster prime lens?

Is it the f/5.6 cross-type sensors in the 7D, the high-precision f/2.8 center AF sensor in the 7D & 5D, or any of the f/5.6 & f/2.8 cross-type sensors in the 1D? I know that the f/2.8 sensitive sensors are supposed to be more accurate with the small DoF from fast lenses, but are they any better in acquiring focus in low light? If so, why, compared to the f/5.6 sensors? To me, if a sensor is capable of focusing with a f/5.6 lens, wouldn't it actually be more sensitive to low light since the lens itself lets less light in at its max aperture?

Thanks for helping me understand.

-Mike

Post #1, Feb 20, 2010 11:57:26




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
timbop
Goldmember
timbop's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
2,975 posts
Southern New Jersey, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

The best low light sensors are the high precision center point ones, which are cross type with an added adjacent sensor which is activated with a f/2.8 or wider aperture (or f/4 for the 1d4). The flat sensors are only sensitive in 1 plane - a parallel line will be impossible for it to focus on. Obviously, in low light the wider the aperture the better the AF performance - with f/2.8 or wider to get the added benefit of the high precision portion.

Post #2, Feb 20, 2010 12:55:07


Current: 2x5DM3, 8mm fish, 17-40/4, 24-105/4IS, 35/2IS, 70-200/4IS, 85/1.8, 135/2, 580's and AB800's
Formerly: 7D, 300D, 5D, 5DM2, 20D, 50D, 1DM2, 17-55IS, 24-70, 28-135IS, 40/2.8, 50/1.8, 50/1.4, 70-200/2.8IS, 70-300IS, 70-200/2.8, 100 macro, 400/5.6, tammy 17-50 and 28-75, sigma 50 macro & 100-300

LOG IN TO REPLY
DarthMTS47
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
DarthMTS47's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
542 posts
Cleveland, Ohio
[MORE/SHARE]

If the high-precision center points are best, then why does Canon list the 1D Mark IV as having slightly better low light AF (down to -1 EV)? It doesn't have the high precision "X" f/2.8 center sensor point.

Guess I'm still trying to understand it...

-Mike

Post #3, Feb 20, 2010 15:19:43 as a reply to timbop's post 2 hours earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
timbop
Goldmember
timbop's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
2,975 posts
Southern New Jersey, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

DarthMTS47 wrote in post #9647276external link
If the high-precision center points are best, then why does Canon list the 1D Mark IV as having slightly better low light AF (down to -1 EV)? It doesn't have the high precision "X" f/2.8 center sensor point.

Guess I'm still trying to understand it...

-Mike

To get you to buy the 1 series, it has the best AF available. Perhaps it is the materials, software, or something else - but they put the best in the 1
Oh, and th center point of the 1 does have a high precision assist

Post #4, Feb 20, 2010 15:23:15


Current: 2x5DM3, 8mm fish, 17-40/4, 24-105/4IS, 35/2IS, 70-200/4IS, 85/1.8, 135/2, 580's and AB800's
Formerly: 7D, 300D, 5D, 5DM2, 20D, 50D, 1DM2, 17-55IS, 24-70, 28-135IS, 40/2.8, 50/1.8, 50/1.4, 70-200/2.8IS, 70-300IS, 70-200/2.8, 100 macro, 400/5.6, tammy 17-50 and 28-75, sigma 50 macro & 100-300

LOG IN TO REPLY
timbop
Goldmember
timbop's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
2,975 posts
Southern New Jersey, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

something else that might be confusing you is the terminology of the "5.6 sensors" vs. "2.8". The 2.8 sensors are sensitive all the way up to 5.6; 5.6 is the minimal aperture at which any sensor can function other then the 1d's center sensor - which can work down to f/8.

Post #5, Feb 20, 2010 15:28:51


Current: 2x5DM3, 8mm fish, 17-40/4, 24-105/4IS, 35/2IS, 70-200/4IS, 85/1.8, 135/2, 580's and AB800's
Formerly: 7D, 300D, 5D, 5DM2, 20D, 50D, 1DM2, 17-55IS, 24-70, 28-135IS, 40/2.8, 50/1.8, 50/1.4, 70-200/2.8IS, 70-300IS, 70-200/2.8, 100 macro, 400/5.6, tammy 17-50 and 28-75, sigma 50 macro & 100-300

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
apersson850
Cream of the Crop
apersson850's Avatar
Joined Nov 2007
10,705 posts
Traryd, Sweden
[MORE/SHARE]

The ability to focus in low light is mainly a question about the design of the AF sensor. It's a widespread misunderstanding that a lens with a larger opening is better for focusing in low light. But the AF system has its own "effective" aperture, so it doesn't matter if the lens is f/2,8 or f/2, for example. Instead, the larger apertures are interesting when forming the secondary image on the AF sensor, as a wider opening is necessary to establish a longer baseline in the sensor, and thus achieve higher accuracy.
So the question posed by the OP should probably be answered with "Use any point you like, with the camera you have".

But a general advice is that in low light, the sensors will have more trouble finding a suitable contrast to measure. Hence, a cross-type sensor is usually better, as it has twice the probability to find a contrast to work with.

Post #6, Feb 20, 2010 16:15:18 as a reply to timbop's post 46 minutes earlier.


Anders

LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
Joined Nov 2008
3,498 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

The center point is the most accurate (or should be) since it receives the most light. This is why only center points so far are high-precision.

Post #7, Feb 20, 2010 16:24:05




LOG IN TO REPLY
hpjfromdk
Junior Member
Joined May 2007
25 posts
Aarhus, Denmark
[MORE/SHARE]

The light sensitivity of a AF point's line sensor, ignoring filters etc., is mainly governed by the size, i.e. light receiving area of its pixels - the bigger the pixels, the better the sensitivity, but the bigger the pixels the lower the inherent resolution of the AF line sensor.

Phase Detection AF is based on images taken from opposite sides of the camera main lens (exit pupil) projected by the Secondary Image Reforming optics onto said line sensors. With the subject in focus these images will be projected with a certain distance onto the line sensors, a distance referred to as "baseline". In the OOF state the image projections will be either closer together (front focus) or farther apart (rear focus) and hence the deviation from the "baseline" yield information about the amount of defocus as well as the direction.

That a line sensor is specified as F5.6 or F2.8 has to do with it's baseline, where a F2.8 sensor has approx the double baseline of a F5.6 line sensor. Back projection of the line sensors onto the main lens's exit pupil hence means that F2.8 line sensors get their images at a greater distance from the lens optical axis than do the F5.6 sensors. A F5.6 sensor will hence always be able to use a max aperture F2.8 lens whereas the opposite potentially would have the F2.8 line sensor pair projected outside exit pupil aperture of a lens with max aperture of F5.6..

The main enemy of PD-AF is vignetting, and even though the "back projection" of a F2.8line sensor might actually fit inside the exit pupil aperture of a lens having max aperture of say F4.0, using the sensor in this context might lead to vignetting of the "outer regions" of the images projected onto the line sensors, resulting in front focus.

Looking on vignetting data, you'll notice that most large aperture lenses are significantly vignetted wide open, one reason that say F1.4 baseline line sensors are not used. But large aperture lenses OTOH also mean more light, which works in the same way for AF sensors as for image sensors, i.e. faster exposure and less noise at a given shutter speed and light level.

To work out the projected image distance on the AF line sensors a certain amount of contrast (i.e. difference between the brightest and darkest part of the image seen by the line sensor) is needed, which can lead to problems with both too bright and too dark scenarios. To that comes that the latter scenario also has the problem that image noise will be added to the pixel data resulting in imprecise image distance determination (focus error)

Thus as such F5.6 line sensors are not more light sensitive than F2.8 sensors - if they use the same pixel size, but F2.8 sensors with their larger baseline have a better resolution in absolute terms, at the expense of a reduced OOF range handling capability (assuming the same line sensor length).

Along those lines, cross sensors are not more light sensitive than uni-directional sensors per se, but having the double sensor area available and the capability of reading contrast in more directions the chances of finding a sufficiently contrasty pattern at low light levels should be higher with cross point sensors.

How the 1/3 DOF accuracy with in the High Precision mode available with F2.8 AF points and F2.8 lenses or brighter is achieved , is a Canon secret. A qualified guess would however be, that since AF resolution as already calculated below the AF pixel pitch using linear or polynomial regression, the precision of this technique is enhanced by having more light available (read: higher contrast and better signal to noise ratio)...

~ hans ~

Post #8, Feb 20, 2010 16:40:46




LOG IN TO REPLY
DarthMTS47
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
DarthMTS47's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
542 posts
Cleveland, Ohio
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks, Hans! That was extremely helpful in understanding how the sensors work. So the 1D Mark IV has more of the larger baseline sensors, so that allows it to be better in low light AF. Makes sense now.

-Mike

Post #9, Feb 20, 2010 17:19:31 as a reply to hpjfromdk's post 38 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
hpjfromdk
Junior Member
Joined May 2007
25 posts
Aarhus, Denmark
[MORE/SHARE]

DarthMTS47 wrote in post #9647904external link
Thanks, Hans! That was extremely helpful in understanding how the sensors work. So the 1D Mark IV has more of the larger baseline sensors, so that allows it to be better in low light AF. Makes sense now.

-Mike

Actually the 1D series uses what's called an area sensor illustrated below:

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2616/3976095681_91db999803_o.jpg

As can be seen the distance (baseline) between the vertically sensitive (red) F2.8 blocks is about the twice that of the horizontally sensistive (blue) F5.6 blocks.

The blocks contain a number of rows or colums respectively, each subdivided into sections (line sensor pairs) corresponding to the 45 AF points.

The two central rows of the red blocks have larger pixels, and are thus more light sensitive but at the same time have a larger pitch and hence F4.0 rather than F2.8 like the rest of the rows.

This subdivision of longer columns into shorter sections is used in other Canon AF sensors as well (40D, 7D, 5D and more)

If you want to see how the 1dMklV AF sensor looks for real, consult the 1dMklV whitepaper on page 13 (and zoom in)..

~ hans ~

Post #10, Feb 20, 2010 18:14:34




LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
PacAce's Avatar
Joined Feb 2003
26,804 posts
ABE, PA USA
[MORE/SHARE]

timbop wrote in post #9647327external link
something else that might be confusing you is the terminology of the "5.6 sensors" vs. "2.8". The 2.8 sensors are sensitive all the way up to 5.6; 5.6 is the minimal aperture at which any sensor can function other then the 1d's center sensor - which can work down to f/8.

Not so! The f/2.8 sensors only work with lenses of f/2.8 or wider. It absolutely won't work with an f/5.6 lens.

But reverse is true, though. The f/5.6 sensors will also work with f/2.8 lenses or any lens with an aperture of f/5.6 or wider. :)

Post #11, Feb 20, 2010 21:56:31


...Leo

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
timbop
Goldmember
timbop's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
2,975 posts
Southern New Jersey, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

PacAce wrote in post #9649344external link
Not so! The f/2.8 sensors only work with lenses of f/2.8 or wider. It absolutely won't work with an f/5.6 lens.

But reverse is true, though. The f/5.6 sensors will also work with f/2.8 lenses or any lens with an aperture of f/5.6 or wider. :)

uh, no. I absolutely can use a 100-400 at 400mm (f/5.6) with any of my af points of any of my cameras

Post #12, Feb 21, 2010 00:55:31


Current: 2x5DM3, 8mm fish, 17-40/4, 24-105/4IS, 35/2IS, 70-200/4IS, 85/1.8, 135/2, 580's and AB800's
Formerly: 7D, 300D, 5D, 5DM2, 20D, 50D, 1DM2, 17-55IS, 24-70, 28-135IS, 40/2.8, 50/1.8, 50/1.4, 70-200/2.8IS, 70-300IS, 70-200/2.8, 100 macro, 400/5.6, tammy 17-50 and 28-75, sigma 50 macro & 100-300

LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
Joined Nov 2008
24,529 posts
Utah, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

You aren't using the f2.8 sensitive part of that AF point, though when using slower lenses. On the 1D series, the f2.8 sensitive sensors become line points with f5.6 lenses or cross types with f2.8 lenses. On the 20D, all are f5.6 sensors except the center activates an extra X shaped f2.8 sensor when using faster lenses. On the 300D, all points are f5.6 only standard precision points.

Post #13, Feb 21, 2010 01:20:23


Taylor
Galleries: Flickrexternal link
60D | ELPH 330 | iPhone 5s

LOG IN TO REPLY
stargazer78
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2009
183 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

DarthMTS47 wrote in post #9646317external link
Canon 5D Mark II - 9 AF points. Horizontal f/5.6 sensors. High-precision f/2.8 sensor center AF point.

Minor correction: That is probably the most common misconception about the 5D series. It does not share the same AF system you see on the EOS 20D or the Digital Rebels. The actual specs for the 5D are:

  • 15 total AF points
  • 9 selectable AF points
  • 1 Cross Type
  • 3 High Precision Points (with f2.8 lenses)

Post #14, Feb 21, 2010 02:13:14




LOG IN TO REPLY
hpjfromdk
Junior Member
Joined May 2007
25 posts
Aarhus, Denmark
[MORE/SHARE]

.. Perhaps a principle illustration will make things more clear:

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2724/4374862569_d2194d1be0.jpg

From left to right, the camera main lens (exit pupil), shown for a large aperture, say F2.8 and a smaller aperture (dashed). Next the SIR optical system here reduced to one lens. To the right two a pairs of line sensors one pair with about twice the baseline of the other.

It should be fairly clear why a F5.6 baseline sensor will work on a F2.8 lens, but NOT the other way around..

~ hans ~

Post #15, Feb 21, 2010 05:31:29




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
7,063 views & 0 likes for this thread
AF Points: High Precision vs. Cross-type in Low Light Question
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00101 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1075 guests, 918 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Land Shark

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.