LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


With all the respect...

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 28 Feb 2010 (Sunday) 22:18   
LIST NEARBY THREADS

 
eicorvette
Senior Member
eicorvette's Avatar
Joined Oct 2009
155 posts
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

After I asked somebody if they could get the same quality of pics they take with their $5,000 + equipment, with any other camera, someone here answered:

( I'm tired of people talking like the gear makes the photographer. Seriously grow up ) ...

All I have to say back is: YOU GOT THAT WRONG!

I came here to learn, share, talk, etc... and my main concern was that with my new 7D I coulnt get any picture as good as I tought they were going to be for its price. After plenty of crappy pictures, blured, ugly focus, not sharp, I tried to find out more about the lens it comes with which is the 28-135mm and found out that alot of people are in the same situation or are going to be when they test this lens.

I had 5 grand to spend in lenses and accessories and I just got one so far which is the Canon 10-22mm and found out that... wow, now my pictures are not just better, but sharp, in focus, not blured and .... so somebody must have been wrong :rolleyes:

Here is an example of the 28-135mm

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

And here are some pictures I took with the Canon 10-22mm that I got 3 days ago. I have no knowledge of photography except to know when a picture is good and how to set my camera...

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

So for other newbies out there, when you hear those type of comments, print the page, go to the bathroom and use that page as a toilet paper.. seriously some people must live miserable to not share a bit of help... anyway I hope this helps other new people on photography. Good equipment, specially good lenses, like the 85mm or the 10-22, 70-200 f2 are the way to start ;) dont spend time trying to figure out why your pics are blured, full of noise, not in focus with a crappy lens

Post #1, Feb 28, 2010 22:18:36


Canon EOS 7D...

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
TheBurningCrown
Goldmember
TheBurningCrown's Avatar
Joined Oct 2008
4,882 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I really hate to disagree, but I like the photo of your cat far more than any of the 10-22 photos you posted. It's a little soft, but otherwise I like it much better.

Post #2, Feb 28, 2010 22:24:29


-Dave
Gear List & Feedback
flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
eicorvette
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
eicorvette's Avatar
Joined Oct 2009
155 posts
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

TheBurningCrown wrote in post #9703746external link
I really hate to disagree, but I like the photo of your cat far more than any of the 10-22 photos you posted. It's a little soft, but otherwise I like it much better.

Im talking about quality, sharpness, focus... not what about the picture is, of what, etc.. this is a non creative comparison... so, you dont think if I take the same picture of that cat with this new lens will change? :rolleyes:

Post #3, Feb 28, 2010 22:28:08


Canon EOS 7D...

LOG IN TO REPLY
nureality
Goldmember
Joined Jan 2008
3,611 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

kid, you got a LOT to learn.

Post #4, Feb 28, 2010 22:28:09


Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
Gear List | PBase | external linkflickrexternal link
Lots of Fun, Lots of Laughs, Happy Trigger Finger!

LOG IN TO REPLY
pgruiz123
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2007
232 posts
Los Angeles, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

These are really very different pictures. It's hard to get fur to look sharp.

Post #5, Feb 28, 2010 22:29:29 as a reply to TheBurningCrown's post 5 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
CW ­ Jones
Senior Member
CW Jones's Avatar
Joined Jul 2009
737 posts
Connecticut
[MORE/SHARE]

I will be respectfully disagreeing. Gear does not make the photographer. I could list off about 5 people on this site that I would give a 10D to and watch out shoot an amateur with a 7D.

If your working with a 7D and something crappy like the 18-55 non is lens, well ya your pictures aren't going to be great, the 28-135 is considered a pretty decent lens, but you really do get what you pay for sometimes.

I would also like to see exif on all the images. That would help as well. Because blurred images doesn't really have anything to do with lens quality. Thats a shutter speed and aperture thing. Sharpness of a lens will vary, the 28-135 is considered a pretty sharp lens, obviously not an "L" lens tho.

Post #6, Feb 28, 2010 22:32:52


-Collin
Canon 30D Gripped + The "Budget Trinity" of lenses.
Full Gear List Here
Flickrexternal link
Razziexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
05Xrunner's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
4,546 posts
Pittsburgh PA
[MORE/SHARE]

I agree gear makes a difference in certain situations. Such as a 1D would really help with a sports photog get the photos they need. But for static images like this..I dont think gear is going to make much difference at all.

Post #7, Feb 28, 2010 22:35:15 as a reply to pgruiz123's post 5 minutes earlier.


My gear
Canon 50D: Sigma 17-70 OS C:Canon 70-200f4L

LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2006
26,380 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Let me just say this. I Dont know the details of your previous attempts to get help here. The tone of your post bothers me because I have found most members here to be very helpful I'm hoping you misunderstood something, maybe not. There are experienced members here who will tell you that gear doesnt make the photographer. And they have a point as we see a lot of well intentioned folks come on here and throw money at the hobby and yet never learn the basics of exposure, composition, and technique that make for better photos. Of course good gear helps. To deny that out of hand is silly, but once again gear isnt enough by itself. I would encourage you learn from the collected wisdom of people here. I worry from the tone of your post here that might not be the case.

Post #8, Feb 28, 2010 22:36:17




LOG IN TO REPLY
Tortie
Senior Member
Tortie's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
798 posts
New Jersey
[MORE/SHARE]

I'd have to respectfully disagree as well. I'm sure a professional with an 'eye for photography' could get an amazing picture out of a 300D and 18-55 non-IS while a pure beginner might not get what they want out of a 5D and 35L. It's all relative.

Post #9, Feb 28, 2010 22:37:32


Nikon 18-55 VR --> FOR SALE
Nikon D3000 | 18-55 VR | 18-135 | Sigma 30 f/1.4
Check out my deviantARTexternal link.

LOG IN TO REPLY
dcstep
Hatchling
Joined Feb 2010
8 posts
Colorado
[MORE/SHARE]

The first picture is by far the best of the series, in my opinion.

Do you realize that the first picture has bokeh (blurred background) because of the close focus, focal length and wide aperture? This is a desired effect in a portrait like you've taken.

The car images were taken from a distance with a wide angle lens and don't have bokeh, but they're not better compositions.

Post #10, Feb 28, 2010 22:39:14 as a reply to pgruiz123's post 9 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Green_Tea
POTN Poet
Green_Tea's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
645 posts
Columbus, IN
[MORE/SHARE]

I believe that the lens sample thread for the 28-135 has a numerous great sharp awesome photos... as well as a few presumably taken by less capable photographers;)
-Trevor

Post #11, Feb 28, 2010 22:43:25


6D|7D| Sigma 50mm 1.4 EX| Canon 100mm L IS macro| Canon 24-70 II L| Canon MP-E 65| 600 EX-RT| MT-24EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
FatCat0
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2009
519 posts
New Jersey
[MORE/SHARE]

Shorter focal lengths are far more forgiving to bad focus/camera shake too, ESPECIALLY stopped down a little.

Post #12, Feb 28, 2010 22:45:11




LOG IN TO REPLY
eicorvette
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
eicorvette's Avatar
Joined Oct 2009
155 posts
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

Green_Tea wrote in post #9703870external link
I believe that the lens sample thread for the 28-135 has a numerous great sharp awesome photos... as well as a few presumably taken by less capable photographers;)
-Trevor

Thats right, I read too that 2 out of 30 pictures are the ones they post, with a good lens there will be around 18 good pics.

Dont get me wrong people, is just a comparison of those factors I named. Sure a good photographer with a crappy equipment could get good or even better pics than somebody new with a good equipment, of course it will not take him 1 shot, but plenty and thats what makes a difference

Post #13, Feb 28, 2010 22:45:59


Canon EOS 7D...

LOG IN TO REPLY
BLACK ­ MAMBA
Senior Member
Joined Aug 2008
343 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Green_Tea wrote in post #9703870external link
I believe that the lens sample thread for the 28-135 has a numerous great sharp awesome photos... as well as a few presumably taken by less capable photographers;)
-Trevor

^+1

Post #14, Feb 28, 2010 22:48:28


S I G N A T U R E

LOG IN TO REPLY
Cesium
Goldmember
Joined Jun 2009
1,959 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

FatCat0 wrote in post #9703888external link
Shorter focal lengths are far more forgiving to bad focus/camera shake too, ESPECIALLY stopped down a little.

THIS is the reason why the OP isn't enjoying his 28-135 I would assume.

What was the shutter speed used in the cat pic?


That, or missed focus, of course. Either way, the lens can do much better.

Post #15, Feb 28, 2010 22:50:56




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
3,000 views & 0 likes for this thread
With all the respect...
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00086 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
960 guests, 752 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is aaazzz0514

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.