Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 01 Mar 2010 (Monday) 11:56
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

85 1.8 vs 100 2.0 vs 100 2.8 macro.

 
Calhoun213
Member
118 posts
Joined Jul 2007
St. Louis
Mar 01, 2010 11:56 |  #1

I need a lens to take indoor sports pictures (basketball). The 85mm 1.8 gets good reviews but before I pull the trigger I don't want to rule out the 100 2.0 and 100 2.8 macro. How do these 3 lens stack up. I know the 2.8 has macro capabilities as an added bonus. I currently have a Sigma 105 macro but it's slow focus speed is not suitable for basketball so I could sell it if I choose the Canon 100 2.8 to recoup some of the cost. Thanks.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Elisha
Senior Member
576 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Guelph
Mar 01, 2010 12:00 |  #2

Macro lenses will be a little slower in general anyway so that may rule out the 100 f/2.8!


Nikon D750
flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Joined Nov 2008
California
Mar 01, 2010 12:00 |  #3

The 85/1.8 and 100/2 perform similarly. Pick the focal length you like better.

The 100/2.8 is a macro, so its AF is not as fast or as accurate in poor light as the other two, and at f/2.8, you might as well buy a zoom.




LOG IN TO REPLY
drumsfield
Goldmember
drumsfield's Avatar
1,595 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Bethesda Md
Mar 01, 2010 12:21 |  #4

I've had (will be getting the 100mm 2.8 today) all 3 sold the 85 1.8 and 100 2.0 to get the macro because I think it will be more versatile than the other two. Both the 85 and 100 were incredibly sharp and great lenses, but I found I didn't go to them very often since I was shooting on a crop frame and they were too long for most indoor shots and for reach I have a 200mm 2.8. I decided on getting the 100mm 2.8 macro because it would give me a really great portrait/macro lens. I don't see anyone having a problem with using it as a sports lens either.


Canon 5D MkIII | Olympus OM-D | Olympus E-P2 | 16-35L MKII | 24-70L MKII | 70-200L MKII | 85L MKII | EF 50mm 1.4 | EF 100mm 2.8 | 100-400mm L MKII | 20mm 1.7
Feedback and Full gear list
Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jam.radonc
Goldmember
Jam.radonc's Avatar
1,187 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Dublin
Mar 01, 2010 12:48 |  #5

I have the 100mm 2.8L IS. With the hybrid image stabilised system you can held hold this baby for a lot less shutter speed. I know with indoor sports you may need a faster speed so this may not necessarily apply unless you have the ISO to crank up.

It focuses blindingly fast (as fast as the 135mm 2L which I once owned) and doubles as a portrait and macro. All in all a great lens to have.


Jam
5D3 | 450D | Panasonic DMC-LX3 | 430 EX II | ST-E2
24-70 L II | 50L | 50 1.8 I | 100L | Zeiss 35/2 ZE | Zeiss 85/2.8 | Zeiss 135/3.5
[COLOR="Silver"]Sold: 17-40L | 24L II | 85L II | 135L | Sigma 50/1.4 | 5D2

LOG IN TO REPLY
wkahwkah
Member
wkahwkah's Avatar
200 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Vacaville, CA
Mar 01, 2010 13:24 |  #6

IMO its all depends on how much light in the gym. I have both 85 1.8 and 100 2.8 macro and I would
discard macro lens although its accurate, it might not focus fast enough to players moving around.
My old High school had terrible light so 1.8 on 85mm helped bit more than 2.0 on 100 so I chose 85mm.
Also, 85 and 100 are really close that few stepping front/back would make it same fov so its all depends
on if u need 1.8 or 2.0 to maintain speed. However, 85mm is bit more prone to purple fringe.


Canon 1Ds III | Canon 1D III | Canon 24 TS-E f3.5L | Canon 35mm f1.4L | Canon 70~200mm f2.8L IS II | Canon 430exII

LOG IN TO REPLY
yourdoinitwrong
Goldmember
yourdoinitwrong's Avatar
2,394 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Indiana
Mar 01, 2010 14:07 as a reply to wkahwkah's post |  #7

I just bought the 85mm for my 7D and it is a little long for a crop body but I didn't have many other choices for an affordable indoor sports lens. It takes very sharp pictures and focuses quickly though so I'm working on adjusting my positioning to compensate for the focal length. I don't know about the 100 but the 85 can definitely have a fair amount of purple fringing at large apertures. For $380 though I'm very happy with it.


7D2 w/ BG-E16, 7D w/ BG-E7, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8
Full List

LOG IN TO REPLY
nightcat
Goldmember
4,479 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Mar 01, 2010 14:16 |  #8

Forget the macro for sports. You need speed indoors. Have you tried your Sigma for basketball? If that 100-105mm range is perfect, then get the 100mm 2.0. If its too long, then the 85mm is the answer. Per Photozone, they do indicate the 100mm 2.0 has less CA than the 85mm 1.8, but most important is getting the correct focal length.




LOG IN TO REPLY
shybull
Member
Joined Jul 2003
Jacksonville, FL
Mar 01, 2010 14:19 as a reply to yourdoinitwrong's post |  #9

I have both the 85 and the 100 macro and I've used both for dancers on stage with stage lighting. The macro was to slow focusing. I much prefer the 85 when light is low and you need fast focusing. Never used the 100 2.0


Canon 70D, 40D,Drebel XT, 50 1.8, 85 1.8, 200 2.8L, 100 2.8 Macro,
70-200 F4 IS, 24-105 F4 IS, 100-300 4.5-5.6,
Sigma 10-20, Sigma 30mm 1.4
580EX & 420EX, Kenko Extension Tubes

LOG IN TO REPLY
Quizzical_Squirrel
Senior Member
499 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Mar 01, 2010 14:22 |  #10

I've tried using the 100 2.8 IS macro for indoor action shots and it didn't achieve focus fast enough for me.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Jam.radonc
Goldmember
Jam.radonc's Avatar
1,187 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Dublin
Mar 01, 2010 14:58 |  #11

Quizzical_Squirrel wrote in post #9707843external link
I've tried using the 100 2.8 IS macro for indoor action shots and it didn't achieve focus fast enough for me.

Did you try to pre set the focusing from 0.5m to infinity? You'd be surprised on how fast it focuses. It is as fast as my once had 135mm f2 and that's saying a lot.


Jam
5D3 | 450D | Panasonic DMC-LX3 | 430 EX II | ST-E2
24-70 L II | 50L | 50 1.8 I | 100L | Zeiss 35/2 ZE | Zeiss 85/2.8 | Zeiss 135/3.5
[COLOR="Silver"]Sold: 17-40L | 24L II | 85L II | 135L | Sigma 50/1.4 | 5D2

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,082 views & 0 likes for this thread
85 1.8 vs 100 2.0 vs 100 2.8 macro.
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00445 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is ryanorielly
826 guests, 585 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016