LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


85 1.8 vs 100 2.0 vs 100 2.8 macro.

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 01 Mar 2010 (Monday) 11:56   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Calhoun213
Member
Joined Jul 2007
99 posts
St. Louis
[MORE/SHARE]

I need a lens to take indoor sports pictures (basketball). The 85mm 1.8 gets good reviews but before I pull the trigger I don't want to rule out the 100 2.0 and 100 2.8 macro. How do these 3 lens stack up. I know the 2.8 has macro capabilities as an added bonus. I currently have a Sigma 105 macro but it's slow focus speed is not suitable for basketball so I could sell it if I choose the Canon 100 2.8 to recoup some of the cost. Thanks.

Post #1, Mar 01, 2010 11:56:01




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Elisha
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2006
568 posts
Guelph
[MORE/SHARE]

Macro lenses will be a little slower in general anyway so that may rule out the 100 f/2.8!

Post #2, Mar 01, 2010 12:00:16


Canon EOS 5D Mark II
flickr®external link
FLUIDRexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
Joined Nov 2008
3,498 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

The 85/1.8 and 100/2 perform similarly. Pick the focal length you like better.

The 100/2.8 is a macro, so its AF is not as fast or as accurate in poor light as the other two, and at f/2.8, you might as well buy a zoom.

Post #3, Mar 01, 2010 12:00:54




LOG IN TO REPLY
drumsfield
Goldmember
drumsfield's Avatar
Joined Oct 2009
1,508 posts
Bethesda Md
[MORE/SHARE]

I've had (will be getting the 100mm 2.8 today) all 3 sold the 85 1.8 and 100 2.0 to get the macro because I think it will be more versatile than the other two. Both the 85 and 100 were incredibly sharp and great lenses, but I found I didn't go to them very often since I was shooting on a crop frame and they were too long for most indoor shots and for reach I have a 200mm 2.8. I decided on getting the 100mm 2.8 macro because it would give me a really great portrait/macro lens. I don't see anyone having a problem with using it as a sports lens either.

Post #4, Mar 01, 2010 12:21:38


Canon 5D MkIII | Olympus OM-D | Olympus E-P2 | 16-35L MKII | 24-70L MKII | 70-200L MKII | 85L MKII | EF 50mm 1.4 | EF 100mm 2.8 | 100-400mm L | 20mm 1.7
Feedback and Full gear list
500PXexternal link
D.C. Area Photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jam.radonc
Goldmember
Jam.radonc's Avatar
Joined Feb 2010
1,187 posts
Dublin
[MORE/SHARE]

I have the 100mm 2.8L IS. With the hybrid image stabilised system you can held hold this baby for a lot less shutter speed. I know with indoor sports you may need a faster speed so this may not necessarily apply unless you have the ISO to crank up.

It focuses blindingly fast (as fast as the 135mm 2L which I once owned) and doubles as a portrait and macro. All in all a great lens to have.

Post #5, Mar 01, 2010 12:48:26


Jam
5D3 | 450D | Panasonic DMC-LX3 | 430 EX II | ST-E2
24-70 L II | 50L | 50 1.8 I | 100L | Zeiss 35/2 ZE | Zeiss 85/2.8 | Zeiss 135/3.5
[COLOR="Silver"]Sold: 17-40L | 24L II | 85L II | 135L | Sigma 50/1.4 | 5D2

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
wkahwkah
Senior Member
wkahwkah's Avatar
Joined Dec 2009
198 posts
Vacaville, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

IMO its all depends on how much light in the gym. I have both 85 1.8 and 100 2.8 macro and I would
discard macro lens although its accurate, it might not focus fast enough to players moving around.
My old High school had terrible light so 1.8 on 85mm helped bit more than 2.0 on 100 so I chose 85mm.
Also, 85 and 100 are really close that few stepping front/back would make it same fov so its all depends
on if u need 1.8 or 2.0 to maintain speed. However, 85mm is bit more prone to purple fringe.

Post #6, Mar 01, 2010 13:24:24


Canon 1D III | Canon 1Ds II | Canon 24 TS-E f3.5L | Canon 35mm f1.4L | Canon 70~200mm f2.8L IS II | Canon 430exII

LOG IN TO REPLY
yourdoinitwrong
Goldmember
yourdoinitwrong's Avatar
Joined Apr 2009
2,394 posts
Indiana
[MORE/SHARE]

I just bought the 85mm for my 7D and it is a little long for a crop body but I didn't have many other choices for an affordable indoor sports lens. It takes very sharp pictures and focuses quickly though so I'm working on adjusting my positioning to compensate for the focal length. I don't know about the 100 but the 85 can definitely have a fair amount of purple fringing at large apertures. For $380 though I'm very happy with it.

Post #7, Mar 01, 2010 14:07:15 as a reply to wkahwkah's post 42 minutes earlier.


7D2 w/ BG-E16, 7D w/ BG-E7, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8
Full List

LOG IN TO REPLY
nightcat
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2008
4,441 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Forget the macro for sports. You need speed indoors. Have you tried your Sigma for basketball? If that 100-105mm range is perfect, then get the 100mm 2.0. If its too long, then the 85mm is the answer. Per Photozone, they do indicate the 100mm 2.0 has less CA than the 85mm 1.8, but most important is getting the correct focal length.

Post #8, Mar 01, 2010 14:16:29




LOG IN TO REPLY
shybull
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2003
164 posts
Jacksonville, FL
[MORE/SHARE]

I have both the 85 and the 100 macro and I've used both for dancers on stage with stage lighting. The macro was to slow focusing. I much prefer the 85 when light is low and you need fast focusing. Never used the 100 2.0

Post #9, Mar 01, 2010 14:19:09 as a reply to yourdoinitwrong's post 11 minutes earlier.


40D,Drebel XT, 50 1.8, 85 1.8, 200 2.8L, 100 2.8 Macro,
70-200 F4 IS, 24-105 F4 IS, 100-300 4.5-5.6, 28-135 IS
Sigma 24-70 2.8, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 30mm 1.4
580EX & 420EX, Kenko Extension Tubes

LOG IN TO REPLY
Quizzical_Squirrel
Senior Member
Joined Aug 2009
507 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I've tried using the 100 2.8 IS macro for indoor action shots and it didn't achieve focus fast enough for me.

Post #10, Mar 01, 2010 14:22:56




LOG IN TO REPLY
Jam.radonc
Goldmember
Jam.radonc's Avatar
Joined Feb 2010
1,187 posts
Dublin
[MORE/SHARE]

Quizzical_Squirrel wrote in post #9707843external link
I've tried using the 100 2.8 IS macro for indoor action shots and it didn't achieve focus fast enough for me.

Did you try to pre set the focusing from 0.5m to infinity? You'd be surprised on how fast it focuses. It is as fast as my once had 135mm f2 and that's saying a lot.

Post #11, Mar 01, 2010 14:58:43


Jam
5D3 | 450D | Panasonic DMC-LX3 | 430 EX II | ST-E2
24-70 L II | 50L | 50 1.8 I | 100L | Zeiss 35/2 ZE | Zeiss 85/2.8 | Zeiss 135/3.5
[COLOR="Silver"]Sold: 17-40L | 24L II | 85L II | 135L | Sigma 50/1.4 | 5D2

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)


LIST NEARBY THREADS
2,379 views & 0 likes for this thread
85 1.8 vs 100 2.0 vs 100 2.8 macro.
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00084 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1033 guests, 813 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is aaazzz0514

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.