![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
Every time I drive home from work around sunset, I pass some beautiful houses in Beverly Hills. Nothing too fancy, but time and again, some house catches my eye and I wish I had a camera with me.
I was planning to take my camera, a tripod and shoot some HDR photos. Now, with this photographer being banned from businesses because he was taking pictures of people on public property scandal, I'm wondering if I should expect a similar reaction. I'm not planning on taking pictures of people, just houses from a sidewalk at the most. I'm not going to even step onto someone else's private property. While I can understand if people don't want to be photographed on the street, these are just houses and I will even try my best not to record street names, but I don't think it matters. I think if I could explain to people that I'm working on a small project and their house caught my attention, they might be more lenient to relax and let me take photos. Any thoughts or comments?
__________________
Bunnies will rule the world! ------------------------------ Website | Gear List & Feedback |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Houses, Houses, Houses, Church | SF David | Urban Life & Travel | 7 | 6th of March 2009 (Fri) 22:06 |
| Taking zoo pictures | tofin | General Photography Talk | 9 | 3rd of September 2007 (Mon) 11:38 |
| taking pictures into the sun | webejamn | General Photography Talk | 7 | 21st of February 2006 (Tue) 15:39 |
| Must be taking too many pictures... | TeamSpeed | People | 5 | 2nd of January 2006 (Mon) 17:51 |
| Are you done taking pictures yet??? | markubig | People | 3 | 22nd of December 2004 (Wed) 20:52 |