Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 10 Apr 2010 (Saturday) 09:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Ideal height for studio lights?

 
munzzzzzzz
Senior Member
591 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: SE WI
     
Apr 10, 2010 09:55 |  #1

What is the ideal height for mounting studio lights?

I know that they need to be higher than the subject, and typically when I see setups for portraits of adults they are a few feet higher than the person, but is there a general rule in terms of feet, percentage, etc, or is it "get them as high as you can"? The reason I ask is that I'm trying to figure out how large I can go on a modifier (either octagonal softbox or PLM) being limited by 7' ceilings. My "subject" is my 2.5' tall son, so I do have a lot of room to go up, and I want to go as large as possible on the modifier while still being able to get it high enough above him. Thoughts? I'm leaning towards a 64" PLM, a 60(ish)" softbox, or a 48" softbox.

Keep in mind that I can mount from the ceiling, so it could technically be right on top of him shining straight down, but I recognise that isn't really the ideal setup.


6D | 40mm f/2.8 | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200mm f/4L IS | 580EXII | 2x PCB Einstein | Various Modifiers

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,473 posts
Likes: 152
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Apr 10, 2010 10:04 |  #2

I doubt that anyone can really give you a firm answer, as the position of the light has everything to do with how the light falls on the subject, the position of the subject (sitting straight, leaning over, etc.).

The key would be to have equipment and space that allows you to move the lights. The monster modifiers limit the ways you can move them. Reflectors are your friends as well.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
griptape
Goldmember
2,037 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Home
     
Apr 10, 2010 13:29 |  #3

There really isn't an absolute, but think of it like the sun. You wouldn't want it directly above the subject because it would create hard shadows under eyes/nose/other deep features. So think of the times of day you can shoot outside and get pleasant results (especially overcast days if you're using a softbox), and how you can get good results using flash in conjunction with the sun to get good results. Place accordingly for the light you're going for and you're good.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hoppy65
Member
126 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2010
     
Apr 10, 2010 17:10 |  #4

munzzzzzzz wrote in post #9968956 (external link)
What is the ideal height for mounting studio lights?

That's a bit like asking "how long is a piece of string?" ;)

Realisticly, I think you should perhaps have been asking what sized light modifier would best suit your subject, but even that is a little general.

Personally, I would not bother getting anything bigger than the 29" height of your son. That size will be big enough if you are wanting to get even lighting on him when he is standing. If you have a 30" octa you will get plenty of soft light on him by placing it relatively close and it's size will give you plenty of scope for light placement.


http://hopkinsfoto.smu​gmug.com/ (external link)
http://www.hopkinsfoto​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
munzzzzzzz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
591 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: SE WI
     
Apr 10, 2010 19:16 |  #5

Yeah, I know, it was a pretty general question, and it does have just as much to do with the size of the modifier. The thing is, I've been to two different studios with him now, and at both places 1) they had large modifiers (4-5 ft), 2) they weren't very high, and 3) they didn't move them at all. In fact, at one of the places the lights were permanently mounted in a fixed location (they had multiple spots to shoot with different setups at each). I don't think I'm going to be changing up how I shoot much, so I was thinking (hoping) I could mount something like a 48" octo from the ceiling in just the right spot and pretty much leave it there. Is this practical?

At his age I don't have too much time to try different things, so the idea is to be able to bring him in when he's in a good mood, shoot for 15 or 20 minutes, and be done, but do this on a regular basis.


6D | 40mm f/2.8 | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200mm f/4L IS | 580EXII | 2x PCB Einstein | Various Modifiers

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
munzzzzzzz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
591 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: SE WI
     
Apr 10, 2010 19:16 |  #6

Yeah, I know, it was a pretty general question, and it does have just as much to do with the size of the modifier. The thing is, I've been to two different studios with him now, and at both places 1) they had large modifiers (4-5 ft), 2) they weren't very high, and 3) they didn't move them at all. In fact, at one of the places the lights were permanently mounted in a fixed location (they had multiple spots to shoot with different setups at each). I don't think I'm going to be changing up how I shoot much, so I was thinking (hoping) I could mount something like a 48" octo from the ceiling in just the right spot and pretty much leave it there. Is this practical?

At his age I don't have too much time to try different things, so the idea is to be able to bring him in when he's in a good mood, shoot for 15 or 20 minutes, and be done, but do this on a regular basis.


6D | 40mm f/2.8 | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200mm f/4L IS | 580EXII | 2x PCB Einstein | Various Modifiers

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
9,971 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Gig Harbor, Washington
     
Apr 11, 2010 06:53 as a reply to  @ munzzzzzzz's post |  #7

high enough or low enough so the catch lights in the eyes look good. and good would be where your creative instincts tell you to put the lights.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,473 posts
Likes: 152
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Apr 11, 2010 07:12 |  #8

munzzzzzzz wrote in post #9970931 (external link)
Yeah, I know, it was a pretty general question, and it does have just as much to do with the size of the modifier. The thing is, I've been to two different studios with him now, and at both places 1) they had large modifiers (4-5 ft), 2) they weren't very high, and 3) they didn't move them at all. In fact, at one of the places the lights were permanently mounted in a fixed location (they had multiple spots to shoot with different setups at each).

The operators of some photo studios do tend to get into a production mode and do not necessarily attempt to optimize the results for every client by changing their setup around for each client. If their results are "good enough" to sell consistently, they may just work with one basic lighting setup in their studio.

You need to work with various setups to learn about lighting and to choose what's best for your situations.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
111t
Senior Member
Avatar
577 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Apr 11, 2010 09:33 |  #9

umphotography wrote in post #9972982 (external link)
high enough or low enough so the catch lights in the eyes look good. and good would be where your creative instincts tell you to put the lights.

++1


All The best!
-Paul

WHAT TO DO IF YOU DON"T HAVE A LIGHT METER AND YOU STILL WANT TO MAKE INTELLIGENT EXPOSURE DECISIONS.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FeXL
Senior Member
493 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2007
     
Apr 11, 2010 11:57 as a reply to  @ 111t's post |  #10

You want to start with your catch lights at 10 (o'clock) or at 2, depending on what side of the subject the light is at. That will likely give you the most flattering look.

After that, go crazy.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M3 ­ Inspirations
Member
51 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Apr 11, 2010 11:59 |  #11

Yep, subject dependant and lighting style wanted




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FJ ­ LOVE
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,875 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Nov 2006
Location: barrie ont. ca
     
Apr 12, 2010 00:31 |  #12

munzzzzzzz i have a small basement set up for taking pics of my 3 yr old and find beauty dishes work best for me, i leave the softboxes and plm's alone when he's down.
i ceiling mount a couple of dishes, no stands and let him play. it's not likely he'll sit long enough for rembrandt lighting anyway.


DILLIGAF about your bicycle or your gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
munzzzzzzz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
591 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: SE WI
     
Apr 12, 2010 10:27 |  #13

Yeah, I definitely understand that you never really get a chance to "pose" a child his age. I want to go with a larger light for a few reasons:

- it should obviously provide softer lighting
- it should cover a larger area, giving him more room left-to right
- it should allow me to pull the light further away from him, making it less of a distraction and decreasing the change in exposure caused by him moving closer to me

That much I've been able to establish, but I obviously still have much to learn that I need to have lights in hand to experiment with. I still need to buy modifiers too, and that's kind of where this question came from... I won't know what it takes to get the look I want until I have it in hand but obviously have to buy something before I get to experiment. Sort of a "what came first, the chicken or the egg" type of problem.

Fortunately all of the options I'm considering are relatively inexpensive so I may just end up buying a few different options so I can see what I like best. At least with the PLM it is easy to fold up, so maybe that is my first choice. Does that seem to make sense?


6D | 40mm f/2.8 | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200mm f/4L IS | 580EXII | 2x PCB Einstein | Various Modifiers

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,950 views & 0 likes for this thread
Ideal height for studio lights?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is alspry
874 guests, 426 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.