Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 03 May 2010 (Monday) 21:40
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

IS performance question on 70-200 f/4 L IS

 
nonick
Goldmember
1,587 posts
Joined Jun 2009
NYC
May 03, 2010 21:40 |  #1

I know that the 70-200 f/4L IS has better IS performance then the 2.8 IS mark I. Anyone compare it with the 70-200 2.8 L IS MarkII?


Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
matrix311
Senior Member
matrix311's Avatar
529 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Laveen, AZ
May 03, 2010 21:43 |  #2

not yet.


Eric Schlaht - Phoenix Arizona Photographer
http://www.esimaging.n​etexternal link - http://esimaging.blogs​pot.comexternal link - http://www.facebook.co​m/esimagingexternal link
Canon 7D, 40D, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/4 IS, 85mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.8, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, Kenko Tubes, White Lightning X800's, 430EX, Yongnuo YN-468 and Cybersync's.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Yaamon
Goldmember
1,433 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Markham, Ontario
May 03, 2010 21:59 as a reply to matrix311's post |  #3

It should be the same IS performance as the F4 IS.


Gear List
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
MHO
Goldmember
MHO's Avatar
1,406 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Kingston, Surrey
May 04, 2010 06:46 |  #4

It should be exactly the same.
They both have the 4stop equivalent IS.


MHO Photography on Flickrexternal link
Facebook Pageexternal link
5D2 & 1D2n & Some Lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
nonick
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,587 posts
Joined Jun 2009
NYC
May 05, 2010 00:10 |  #5

Really exactly the same? anyone had real experience can share some ideas?


Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
nureality
Goldmember
3,611 posts
Joined Jan 2008
May 05, 2010 00:14 |  #6

Its anyone's guess, but by all means it should be as good or better than the f/4L IS's IS. It might even have the tri-axial IS found in the 100mm f/2.8L IS. Funny no one's brought that up.


Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
Gear List | PBase | external linkflickrexternal link
Lots of Fun, Lots of Laughs, Happy Trigger Finger!

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,000 views & 0 likes for this thread
IS performance question on 70-200 f/4 L IS
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00069 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is andrewwong927
833 guests, 308 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016