![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16
|
I am about ready to buy the Rebel XT body from Canon, but I was planning on getting the Sigma Zoom Super Wide Angle 18-200mm. Is this a good choice? What is that lens good or bad at? Thanks
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
"flat out embarrassing"
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
|
It's a good lens if you mean convenient and generally good optics. There are better and there are worse. It's fairly new and many seem to like it, though I don't think it surpasses it's sibling the 18-125 in image quality. If you want a good, convenient, fairly small lens for walking around and for use in mostly daylight and outdoors, it's a very good buy. Otherwise, you might want to invest in some "faster" lenses, such as the Canon 50 f1.8, 3rd party 24-70/28-75 lenses, and Canon 70-200 f4 or Sigma 70-200 f2.8. But your budget and type of use should really help decide all this. Best wishes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16
|
Do you think it might be a better idea to stay with the Canon 17-85mm lens it comes with?
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
|
why would you get another 18-200 when you already have a 17-85.
What you would need is something from 75-200 So as fstopjojo mentioned, a 70-200 (canon or sigma) will help you avoid overlap. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16
|
I don't have the lenses, i was trying to pick which one I should get..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 20,732
|
Quote:
If yes, then it will do you at least as well as the SIgma. If no, then the Sigma's mentioned by fstop will be decent buys, or so would the 17-85mm IS. Canon's normally come with the 18-55mm. Do you have this one? I need to lie down
__________________
Now full! Great African Photo Safari 2013 - Kruger National Park, South Africa click |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"flat out embarrassing"
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
|
I didn't know you had the 17-85IS. IMO, you should keep the 17-85 and add to it either the Canon 70-200 f4 or the Sigma 70-200 f2.8. If you wanted to go cheaper for a 70-xxx zoom, you could go with the new Sigma 70-300 APO DG, but image quality is not as good as the 70-200s. Another good lens is the Sigma 100-300 f4 EX.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
|
Sorry I got the impression you have the 17-85.
Well, seeing as you starting your lens buying process. Think of it this way, what are you going to shoot? Landscape? Candid? Glamour? Sports? Wildlife? Maybe a little of everything? Ok, next question, whats your budget? Next question, seeing as most ppl dont have an unlimited budget (if u did, you woulnt be posting this thread), what are you itching to shoot ASAP? If its landscape, then get a nice wide angle ( I am beggining to prefer primes over zoom ) If is portraits, get something in the 50-135mm range. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
Cocker Spaniel Mod Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kensington, MD USA
Posts: 65,148
|
He hasn't bought it yet, and is wondering whether to get the kit 350D+17-85 or the 350D body only and a separate Sigma 18-200.
__________________
Jon ---------- EOS, Powershot and Domke - it doesn't get any better than this!
T90 and stuff | F-1n, New F-1, FTb and more stuff out on loan Cocker Spaniels Maryland and Virginia activities DC Cherry Blossoms Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link) PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16
|
Yuss! Jon knows where I'm coming from. I'm a starter and I don't understand lens very well so I don't know which lens to get... as you can see...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
|
somethingfunny, we are willing to help you
Answer my above questions so we can begin the session Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
User is banned from forums
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Leicestershire - England
Posts: 237
|
Lenses can be expensive items and a collection of them can easily exceed the price of your camera.
As you're a beginner, my advice to you is to forget expensive lenses for the time being and make a start either with a Kit Lens or what you have already until you've gained sufficient knowledge to decide what focal lengths and maximum apertures will meet your individual needs and fit into your budget. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 115
|
we really need to know what you shoot as corruptedphotographer has stated above...if you are just learning and just shooting around get the 50mm 1.8 or 1.4. Once you know(learn) what you like to shoot, then start investing more moeny towards that lens.
Landscapes and wide - canon's 10-22 Normal walk-around - sigma 15-50 2.8 or canon 17-85 wildlife and more - canon 70-200L plus TC or Canon 100-300 Portrait - use the 50 1.4 or 1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
Hope That Helps.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 115
|
a good walk around is the sigma 18-50 2.8. i think its about $400. I dont have this lens, but I was fighting between this one and the canon 17-85 myself. from my research...many people prefer the sigma 18-50 because it has better picture quality, much cheaper and it is way much faster. But, since the canon 17-85 has an IS (I dont carry tripods) and covers more range...Im leaning towards that one instead. Buying lens is a big decision process...what do you must have and what you can do without. hopefully this will help you a bit!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which 70/75-300 zoom lens is a good starter lens? | Sangster1 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 8 | 9th of January 2007 (Tue) 14:41 |
| Buying a starter lens | matt1987 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 2 | 5th of November 2006 (Sun) 10:53 |
| Starter lens | jlozano180 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 4 | 28th of September 2006 (Thu) 18:12 |
| starter lens | jhg | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 12 | 17th of July 2005 (Sun) 11:38 |
| Best starter lens for 1d | rmacht | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 1 | 9th of March 2003 (Sun) 01:56 |