Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre People Talk
Thread started 28 Jun 2010 (Monday) 09:06
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Portrait lens

 
USER876
Goldmember
1,616 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Jun 28, 2010 09:06 |  #1

I am on the fence about what to buy next. I keep thinking I am eventually going to be going to full frame, but am shooting a 40d right now. Currently I have a 24-105L and a 50mm F1.8.

I am thinking of buying a 17-55 F2.8, an 85mm, or the 50mm F1.4. Any advice? This will be for mostly outdoor shooting (park settings,etc).




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Austin.Manny
Goldmember
Austin.Manny's Avatar
1,040 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Jacksonville, Florida
Jun 28, 2010 12:22 |  #2

You might get some more input in the Lens Forum. ;)

But here's my advice, take your 24-105 out and determine which is your favorite focal length and go from there.
That said, you already have a 50mm f/1.8. I personally have the 85mm f/1.8 and love it! I think it would be a nice addition to your current gear lineup.


450D Gripped | Σ 30 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.8 | 18-55 IS
LumoPro LP180 | Yongnuo YN-460 |
RF-602

Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
USER876
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,616 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Jun 28, 2010 12:38 as a reply to Austin.Manny's post |  #3

Well, I love the 24-105, mine was calibrated and is so sharp some of the pictures don't even look real. The problem is, to blur the background, I have to be at +85mm, and quite a distance away from the subject. The bokeh of this lens isn't the best either. And then I am so far away, the on camera fill flash (on sunny days) isn't effective.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Austin.Manny
Goldmember
Austin.Manny's Avatar
1,040 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Jacksonville, Florida
Jun 28, 2010 15:48 |  #4

I see. Well I would get an 85mm f/1.8. It's a superb lens. You already have 50mm covered (twice, actually), unless you really want a good quality 50mm. In that case, I'd recommend a Sigma 50mm f/1.4. It is light years ahead of the Canon 50mm f/1.4.


450D Gripped | Σ 30 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.8 | 18-55 IS
LumoPro LP180 | Yongnuo YN-460 |
RF-602

Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
scroller52
Senior Member
964 posts
Joined Dec 2009
NYC
Jun 28, 2010 16:17 |  #5

for portraits u want something in the 85+ focal length. the most highly touted ones are the 85L and the 135L which both produce unreal bokeh. 70-200 zooms are used very much as well.


Canon EOS 5D3 | Canon 24mm 1.4L mkII | Canon 85mm 1.2L mkI | Canon 40mm 2.8
my flickrexternal link
my picasaexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
USER876
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,616 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Jun 28, 2010 16:47 as a reply to scroller52's post |  #6

scroller, I agree, but on a FF camera. My 40D is 1.6x so ~50mm is more appropriate I think.

Why makes the sigma 50 better than the cannon?




LOG IN TO REPLY
emdzey01
Senior Member
349 posts
Joined Apr 2008
SoCal
Jul 01, 2010 18:24 |  #7

since you're plan to switch to full frame down the road, you should remove the 17-55 from consideration unless you want to deal with the hassle of selling the lens again once you switch to full frame.

the 85mm f/1.8 is an excellent portrait lens for both crop and FF cameras. some will argue that it's a bit too long for indoor portraits and would only be applicable for headshots, but it all depends on how much space you can work with. you have a 50mm f/1.8 if you need a wider angle.

a lot of people prefer the sigma 50 than the canon because of the background blur that the sigma produces. if you check out the lens sample pics forum on this website, you can see for yourself and make the decision based from that. however, there are also reports that the sigma 50mm is a hit-or-miss when it comes to focusing; a number of people have had to send their lens back to sigma for calibration because of poor focus.


my name is mjay.

Click for my transactions as a seller on POTN

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lamar
Junior Member
20 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Jul 04, 2010 12:12 as a reply to emdzey01's post |  #8

I agree with the 85 recommendation. I too shoot with a 40D and purchased a 135 last year. FAR and away the most beautiful bokeh that I've ever seen. I thought that I could live with the focal range on my crop body, but it was just too much. I went back and got the 70-200 f2.8 which gets the job done, but I will own a 135 as soon as I switch to FF.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,800 views & 0 likes for this thread
Portrait lens
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre People Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00229 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is jantebont
771 guests, 511 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016