LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Portrait lens

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre People Talk
Thread started 28 Jun 2010 (Monday) 09:06   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
USER876
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2008
1,611 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I am on the fence about what to buy next. I keep thinking I am eventually going to be going to full frame, but am shooting a 40d right now. Currently I have a 24-105L and a 50mm F1.8.

I am thinking of buying a 17-55 F2.8, an 85mm, or the 50mm F1.4. Any advice? This will be for mostly outdoor shooting (park settings,etc).

Post #1, Jun 28, 2010 09:06:37




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Austin.Manny
Goldmember
Austin.Manny's Avatar
Joined Jun 2009
1,040 posts
Jacksonville, Florida
[MORE/SHARE]

You might get some more input in the Lens Forum. ;)

But here's my advice, take your 24-105 out and determine which is your favorite focal length and go from there.
That said, you already have a 50mm f/1.8. I personally have the 85mm f/1.8 and love it! I think it would be a nice addition to your current gear lineup.

Post #2, Jun 28, 2010 12:22:14


450D Gripped | Σ 30 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.8 | 18-55 IS
LumoPro LP180 | Yongnuo YN-460 |
RF-602

Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
USER876
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2008
1,611 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Well, I love the 24-105, mine was calibrated and is so sharp some of the pictures don't even look real. The problem is, to blur the background, I have to be at +85mm, and quite a distance away from the subject. The bokeh of this lens isn't the best either. And then I am so far away, the on camera fill flash (on sunny days) isn't effective.

Post #3, Jun 28, 2010 12:38:53 as a reply to Austin.Manny's post 16 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Austin.Manny
Goldmember
Austin.Manny's Avatar
Joined Jun 2009
1,040 posts
Jacksonville, Florida
[MORE/SHARE]

I see. Well I would get an 85mm f/1.8. It's a superb lens. You already have 50mm covered (twice, actually), unless you really want a good quality 50mm. In that case, I'd recommend a Sigma 50mm f/1.4. It is light years ahead of the Canon 50mm f/1.4.

Post #4, Jun 28, 2010 15:48:30


450D Gripped | Σ 30 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.8 | 18-55 IS
LumoPro LP180 | Yongnuo YN-460 |
RF-602

Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
scroller52
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2009
964 posts
NYC
[MORE/SHARE]

for portraits u want something in the 85+ focal length. the most highly touted ones are the 85L and the 135L which both produce unreal bokeh. 70-200 zooms are used very much as well.

Post #5, Jun 28, 2010 16:17:57


Canon EOS 5D3 | Canon 24mm 1.4L mkII | Canon 85mm 1.2L mkI | Canon 40mm 2.8
my flickrexternal link
my picasaexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
USER876
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2008
1,611 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

scroller, I agree, but on a FF camera. My 40D is 1.6x so ~50mm is more appropriate I think.

Why makes the sigma 50 better than the cannon?

Post #6, Jun 28, 2010 16:47:41 as a reply to scroller52's post 29 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
emdzey01
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2008
348 posts
SoCal
[MORE/SHARE]

since you're plan to switch to full frame down the road, you should remove the 17-55 from consideration unless you want to deal with the hassle of selling the lens again once you switch to full frame.

the 85mm f/1.8 is an excellent portrait lens for both crop and FF cameras. some will argue that it's a bit too long for indoor portraits and would only be applicable for headshots, but it all depends on how much space you can work with. you have a 50mm f/1.8 if you need a wider angle.

a lot of people prefer the sigma 50 than the canon because of the background blur that the sigma produces. if you check out the lens sample pics forum on this website, you can see for yourself and make the decision based from that. however, there are also reports that the sigma 50mm is a hit-or-miss when it comes to focusing; a number of people have had to send their lens back to sigma for calibration because of poor focus.

Post #7, Jul 01, 2010 18:24:12


my name is mjay.

Click for my transactions as a seller on POTN

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lamar
Mostly Lurking
Joined Oct 2009
11 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I agree with the 85 recommendation. I too shoot with a 40D and purchased a 135 last year. FAR and away the most beautiful bokeh that I've ever seen. I thought that I could live with the focal range on my crop body, but it was just too much. I went back and got the 70-200 f2.8 which gets the job done, but I will own a 135 as soon as I switch to FF.

Post #8, Jul 04, 2010 12:12:34 as a reply to emdzey01's post 2 days earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,714 views & 0 likes for this thread
Portrait lens
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre People Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00105 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
810 guests, 646 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Blueme

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.