Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment People
Thread started 05 Jul 2010 (Monday) 19:40
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Kate-Senior 2011!

 
kgauger30
Senior Member
kgauger30's Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Florida
Jul 05, 2010 19:40 |  #1

This is Kate one of our 2011 Senior Reps. We are trying to make this program work so we hand picked some very outgowing people this year. C&C is welcomed! Thanks so much! The firetruck one was fun, although I really don't like my pics with it, my partner who was shooting(nikon) turned out better. I was a little distracted LOL!!!
Kim

1.

IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e115/kgauger30/IMG_6910-1.jpg

2.
IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e115/kgauger30/IMG_6861.jpg

3.
IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e115/kgauger30/IMG_6919-1.jpg

4.
IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e115/kgauger30/IMG_6929.jpg

5.
IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e115/kgauger30/IMG_7060.jpg

6.
IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e115/kgauger30/IMG_7040.jpg
7.
IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e115/kgauger30/IMG_6988.jpg
8.
IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e115/kgauger30/IMG_7124.jpg

Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.comexternal link
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Muskydave22
Goldmember
Muskydave22's Avatar
1,716 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Menomonee Falls, WI
Jul 05, 2010 20:23 |  #2

Just some CC.

#1 and #3 are probably the strongest of the series, although #1 needs some light in her eyes and oversaturated colors in #3.

#2 looks like a snapshot and she doesn't look very interested.
#4 is pretty far overexposed, and I am guessing that's why you put it to black and white to try and save it.
#5,6 and 7 need some better light, I can tell you are using a speedlight on camera based on the catchlights in the eyes, very harsh shadows behind your subject, not flattering at all.
and #8 is soft and the WB is off.

Just some things to work on, try getting that flash off camera it will work wonders for your pictures.

Dave


Facebookexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
kgauger30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
kgauger30's Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Florida
Jul 05, 2010 20:43 |  #3

Thanks for the CC! :)

#2, was one of the first shots I took of her. She was still very nervous, her mom was still watching her. I just liked it, I don't know why?
#4 the original is not overexposed, it is the preset that I used in lightroom to get that look. it is actually the look I was going for.

I don't like the shadows either, but I had to use the flash.
#8 yes it is soft, I don't really like my firetruck shots, but I was using it to show how fun she was :)

How am I susposed to get it off camera? Where am I susposed to put it? Isn't that what the thing on top of the camera is for? (I'm not good with lighting yet, we usually use 100% natural lighting, however it was a VERY cloudy evening and just kept getting darker)


Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.comexternal link
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
Muskydave22
Goldmember
Muskydave22's Avatar
1,716 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Menomonee Falls, WI
Jul 05, 2010 21:06 |  #4

Just get a light stand, a 43" or 60" convertible umbrella, and some sort of radio trigger, like Paul C Buff Cybersyncs, Pocketwizards, or the Chinese RF-602. Those triggers will let you trigger the flash off camera, which will make your pictures WAY better!

Dave


Facebookexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
kgauger30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
kgauger30's Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Florida
Jul 08, 2010 12:10 |  #5

Hey Dave thanks, I have radio triggers will they plug into the side of the 580 exII? I haven't ever looked at it enough. Will that work for weddings too? Thanks for the suggestion. I will have to try it out. How do you hook up the flash to the stand?


Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.comexternal link
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
HappySnapper90
Cream of the Crop
5,143 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Cleveland, Ohio
Jul 08, 2010 14:26 |  #6

I think the last 2 photos have far too much contrast to be flattering for the subject: bright face and dark face.


http://RobertHoy.zenfo​lio.comexternal link
www.photographybyhoy.c​omexternal link
http://www.facebook.co​m/Photography.by.Hoyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tawcan
Goldmember
Tawcan's Avatar
2,679 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Vancouver Canada
Jul 08, 2010 15:19 |  #7

#3 is by far the best out of the series, wish her eyes are a bit more focused.

How are you focusing? All these pictures look soft. Can't see any EXIF info so not sure if it's a shutter speed issue or misfocus, I'm assuming it's misfocus.

#1 Not bad but wish she's a bit more in focus and the B&W could pop a little bit.
#2 Looks like she was in the middle of posing.
#4 It's way overexposed it's ruining the pic. If you're using a preset in LR you can always tweak it afterward. Try reducing the exposure a bit and use the recovery tool if you shot in RAW.
#5 On-camera flash isn't all that flattering. If it was in focused a bit the pic would capture more interest.
#6 Again the shadow produced by on-camera flash is kind of distracting. The pose isn't the most flattering. Her dress is being pushed out, making her look bigger in the mid section than she is.
#7 Have the potential to be interesting but need to work on the lighting a bit more.
#8 Again very soft and WB is off. Looked like she was in the middle of a pose again.


boblai.comexternal link |Facebook Fanpageexternal link | Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
blackcode
Member
blackcode's Avatar
176 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Jul 08, 2010 18:20 |  #8

HappySnapper90 wrote in post #10500493external link
I think the last 2 photos have far too much contrast to be flattering for the subject: bright face and dark face.

I concur!




LOG IN TO REPLY
kgauger30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
kgauger30's Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Florida
Jul 08, 2010 19:32 |  #9

I used one shot focus with the square on the face for farther away pictures and eyes for close ups. I thought that is how you do it. From everything I have ever read I thought that is how it is to be done. I have always had problems with focusing and I don't know if it is the way that I am doing it, maybe I learned the wrong way?? Maybe it is the 7D or the 70-200 lens?? Any suggestions?


Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.comexternal link
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
Skrim17
The only TPBMer without a title. Enjoying my anonymity.
Skrim17's Avatar
40,070 posts
Joined Jul 2006
In my tree
Jul 08, 2010 19:39 |  #10

I applaud your wanting to learn more about it...but from your website you are charging for these types of pics. wouldn't you feel better knowing you could do a little better with them?

Many of the images appear soft to me, I Am not sure if it is due to lack of focus or downsizing for the web. Your posing is good, locations look great.


Crissa
PLEASE HELP ME FIND MY PHOTOS!!external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
rjharris
Senior Member
rjharris's Avatar
Joined Mar 2010
Near Dallas
Jul 08, 2010 21:37 |  #11

I like #2 the best. If you're using a 7D and a 70-200mm one thing I really noticed on my similar set up was having problems with the soft focusing. Then I took the UV filter off and my image sharpness (quality) jumped way up. I was so disappointed with my set up until I took the UV filter off. I can't remember what type it was but my camera was happy to have it off.




LOG IN TO REPLY
kgauger30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
kgauger30's Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Florida
Jul 09, 2010 07:48 |  #12

I don't use a filter on the lens, never have. I always had problems with quality with the filter on. I know the firetruck shot up top there is not and I don't like any of them(of mine), but like I said I posted that one to show how much fun she was. I make sure to change the focus point with EVERY different pose and shot. Is there something different I should be doing?? With the setup I have this shouldn't be a problem. Could be because they are all handheld shots. But I want to say it is because of the compression for web by photobucket. But I have no idea, or what is going wrong. That is one of the reasons I posted. It happens with my sports action shots as well. I will have the box on the face of the batter, and shooting in AI servo and when I go back to look, the face is OOF.


Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.comexternal link
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
Skrim17
The only TPBMer without a title. Enjoying my anonymity.
Skrim17's Avatar
40,070 posts
Joined Jul 2006
In my tree
Jul 09, 2010 08:52 |  #13

Does this happen with all of your lenses?


Crissa
PLEASE HELP ME FIND MY PHOTOS!!external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Skrim17
The only TPBMer without a title. Enjoying my anonymity.
Skrim17's Avatar
40,070 posts
Joined Jul 2006
In my tree
Jul 09, 2010 08:53 |  #14

If it is only with the 70-200 you might need to have it calibrated by Canon. Search the forum for 'focus chart' and once you get one you can do some testing.

Do you know what your focus setting is on the 7D? Did you have the same problem with your 30D?


Crissa
PLEASE HELP ME FIND MY PHOTOS!!external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
kgauger30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
kgauger30's Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Florida
Jul 11, 2010 10:49 |  #15

The 70-200 is 99% of the time on the camera and what I use. I never use the nifty 50 and rarely do I use the crappy kit lens that I have. Only in desperate need do I use that one. So I can only judge with the 70-200 lens I have. I can be shooting sports and one shot be in focus and the next one not at all. It jumps focus on me all the time. Also like I said I shoot on location and lug around town so I don't use a tripod, but my shutter speed is high enough that it shouldn't matter. And I dont drink caffine or smoke any more so no jittery hands :)

Does it cost anything to get the lens calibrated? Maybe I should have the camera looked at as well?? How long does something like that take? I have ALOT of things coming up and think I should get it done asap.


Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.comexternal link
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,689 views & 0 likes for this thread
Kate-Senior 2011!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment People


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00285 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Junais
949 guests, 688 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015